
ATL: IRMA - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
-
- Admin
- Posts: 20050
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Look at the euro performance through 120 hours.
Also note how the NHC is beating the consensus regularly, especially at longer range.

3 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
If you go here http://www.intellicast.com/Local/WxMap.aspx
Turn on model tracks for the tropics you can see it is already north of the ECMWF run. Quite a bit north already if those plots are accurate. Just pointing that out, and not saying the track overall is wrong. Just seems the storm is moving a little bit more north, but I could be wrong.
Turn on model tracks for the tropics you can see it is already north of the ECMWF run. Quite a bit north already if those plots are accurate. Just pointing that out, and not saying the track overall is wrong. Just seems the storm is moving a little bit more north, but I could be wrong.
1 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Ken711 wrote:
Interesting. How much more influence will it have in future runs...
Depends on how the GFS evolves it which will probably only be an academic point. That's the problem. I think the GFS is wrong from the start since it never hits Florida. So everything going forward is wrong. It will have the right idea of a SE Coast landfall on a NNW or N then NNW/NW heading. But it's likely too far north and too far east initially. If the EURO stays to S or SW FL, you can almost bank that the EC-UK alliance will be right with Irma over what the GFS says based on what it's done all along. Again, if it ends up right, cool. And good for SE FL. I don't trust it very much for Irma.
Last edited by Steve on Wed Sep 06, 2017 11:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 2679
- Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
- Location: Florida State University
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
I didn't believe it at first, but after running the numbers myself, the CMC in fact has out performed the GFS with IRMA at almost all forecast hours. In fact, the SHIPS has out performed the GFS beyond hour 72.


3 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
USTropics wrote:I didn't believe it at first, but after running the numbers myself, the CMC in fact has out performed the GFS with IRMA at almost all forecast hours. In fact, the SHIPS has out performed the GFS beyond hour 72.
Good because I hate the GFS right now.
2 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 43
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
tolakram wrote:Look at the euro performance through 120 hours.Also note how the NHC is beating the consensus regularly, especially at longer range.
or how the CMC is doing better than the GFS by a good bit lol.. why I mentioned earlier I quit paying attention to the GFS after 3 days..
3 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- Bocadude85
- Category 5
- Posts: 2990
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Honolulu,Hi
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Here is the 0z Canadian. Pretty much a landfall in S.Fla
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gem®ion=watl&pkg=mslp_pcpn_frzn&runtime=2017090700&fh=6
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gem®ion=watl&pkg=mslp_pcpn_frzn&runtime=2017090700&fh=6
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
PTPatrick wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:I honestly feel like analyzing synoptics on models is a lost art and instead the focus is on the output. How close am I to the eye, did it shift east or west, how much wind, etc without looking at all the players on the field to see why a model shows a different solution and how plausible it may or may not be. Maybe I’m just old school.
What does ukmet do with this trough that's different than gfs?
The free maps I have for the UK aren’t great, but from what I can tell the UK appears faster with Irma, which allows it to get west quicker before the ridging breaks down. It’s also a bit weaker with the NE trough which results in a slower pull N.
1 likes
-
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 118
- Age: 36
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 1:35 am
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Navgem pretty much follows the UKMET.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
I'm just an enthusiast and weather fan and any comments I make are just my opinion and are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I'm just an enthusiast and weather fan and any comments I make are just my opinion and are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
xironman wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:I honestly feel like analyzing synoptics on models is a lost art and instead the focus is on the output. How close am I to the eye, did it shift east or west, how much wind, etc without looking at all the players on the field to see why a model shows a different solution and how plausible it may or may not be. Maybe I’m just old school.
Lots of east coast winter storm enthusiasts basically only look at synoptics until the storm is 48 hrs out. They know the surface low is going to bounce around from run to run and drive them crazy, looking at the large scale pieces on the chessboard tells you whether it is a threat or not until then. I may have a different opinion than most but the GFS for the most part has been ok, people need to focus on it as a tool, not a forecast.
Yes for winter storms quite a few look at them still but for hurricanes it seems to be a lost art sadly. That piece of energy in the NE and the Midwest energy are key to analyzing and seeing how various models handle them. It’s the difference between a FL direct landfall, grazing the coast or just offshore. I personally like to use the models exactly as a tool, understand their strengths and weaknesses, and then go from there. Euro tonight will be interesting.
4 likes
- Bocadude85
- Category 5
- Posts: 2990
- Age: 38
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
- Location: Honolulu,Hi
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
0z HMON with landfall in Broward County
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=hmon®ion=11L&pkg=mslp_wind&runtime=2017090700&fh=75&xpos=0&ypos=0
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=hmon®ion=11L&pkg=mslp_wind&runtime=2017090700&fh=75&xpos=0&ypos=0
3 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Not gonna stress this enough, when the models are sparring with each other, focus on NHC. I kinda stopped watching the model tracking because it's still full of errors. What makes it wild is that no one can fully predict where Irma can go from here. Right now, I think we should just focus on NHC updates for the most part.
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 43
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
MatthewsRevenge wrote:Not gonna stress this enough, when the models are sparring with each other, focus on NHC. I kinda stopped watching the model tracking because it's still full of errors. What makes it wild is that no one can fully predict where Irma can go from here. Right now, I think we should just focus on NHC updates for the most part.
this is very normal for every system.... we are nowhere near able to rely on models fully.. barely 50 percent..
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
- AdamFirst
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2491
- Age: 36
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
- Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
HWRF has been running...rounds the corner at Andros Island, WNW toward South Dade...no clear sign of a sudden northward jog yet.


0 likes
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022 - Milton 2024
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
MatthewsRevenge wrote:Not gonna stress this enough, when the models are sparring with each other, focus on NHC. I kinda stopped watching the model tracking because it's still full of errors. What makes it wild is that no one can fully predict where Irma can go from here. Right now, I think we should just focus on NHC updates for the most part.
Yeah, but come on. It's the model thread. You're here too.

I go with the NHC #1 even though the Euro is winning Irma. They're still the best and have the best explanations for everything that happens.
HWRF has a pretty solid motion and momentum heading toward SE FL. It's turning at 75, and low 900's. It smokes the Bahamas and curves just east of Miami by 81 hours.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... s=0&ypos=0
HMON nicks a quick hook through SE FL around 901mb, goes offshore and weakens as it heads into N GA.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=200
Last edited by Steve on Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23697
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
00Z GFS ensemble mean right through SE Florida so looks to have shifted west some.
1 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
Steve wrote:MatthewsRevenge wrote:Not gonna stress this enough, when the models are sparring with each other, focus on NHC. I kinda stopped watching the model tracking because it's still full of errors. What makes it wild is that no one can fully predict where Irma can go from here. Right now, I think we should just focus on NHC updates for the most part.
Yeah, but come on. It's the model thread. You're here too.
I go with the NHC #1 even though the Euro is winning Irma. They're still the best and have the best explanations for everything that happens.
HWRF has a pretty solid motion and momentum heading toward SE FL. It's turning at 75, and low 900's. It smokes the Bahamas and curves just east of Miami by 81 hours.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... s=0&ypos=0
HMON nicks a quick hook through SE FL around 901mb, goes offshore and weakens as it heads into N GA.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=200
That HMON track/intensity would be absolutely devastating for SE FL. I can't unsee it, especially now that we are closing in on the 3.5 day window.
Da*n you, Steve!
MW
4 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
gatorcane wrote:00Z GFS ensemble mean right through SE Florida so looks to have shifted west some.
The good news keeps rolling in. Gator & Steve are officially off my holiday card list.
MW
9 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
HWRF following GFS op with the non-landfall in Florida and paralleling coast by 90 hours. This run should also destroy farther up the coast as a strong Cat 4 or 5. I still don't buy it which is 3 out of 3 current models I'm disagreeing with. However, it shows the danger of if there is a miss in this pattern, we would probably see massive destruction along the GA and SC Coasts. Simulated IR4 through 96:
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=398
Edit to say Hey Mike. You know I've been a fan for a long time! Awesome to see the guest star appearance.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0&ypos=398
Edit to say Hey Mike. You know I've been a fan for a long time! Awesome to see the guest star appearance.

Last edited by Steve on Thu Sep 07, 2017 12:40 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
Re: ATL: IRMA - Models
All I can think about is what the mets were saying about Katrina on August 25th, 2005, when the models were showing that it was going to the panhandle/big bend and that there was no way that Louisiana was going to get a hit, and 4 days later, she made landfall at Biloxi/New Orleans.
3 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests