txwatcher91 wrote:I honestly feel like analyzing synoptics on models is a lost art and instead the focus is on the output. How close am I to the eye, did it shift east or west, how much wind, etc without looking at all the players on the field to see why a model shows a different solution and how plausible it may or may not be. Maybe I’m just old school.
Lots of east coast winter storm enthusiasts basically only look at synoptics until the storm is 48 hrs out. They know the surface low is going to bounce around from run to run and drive them crazy, looking at the large scale pieces on the chessboard tells you whether it is a threat or not until then. I may have a different opinion than most but the GFS for the most part has been ok, people need to focus on it as a tool, not a forecast.