ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Connekto
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:50 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9461 Postby Connekto » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:52 am

I wonder if that takes into consideration projectiles
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9462 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:53 am

Miami International

Wind ENE @ 14
Gusts 28.0 mph

How far away is Irma?
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9463 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:54 am

captain1 wrote:In reply to the response to my previous question - Thanks i see I have much, much more to learn because I have idea what that means :oops:


I have no idea what it means either. :)
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

DTMEDIC
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:23 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9464 Postby DTMEDIC » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:54 am

PTPatrick wrote:
Michele B wrote:
thundercam96 wrote:Based on some selective trends that have been showing regarding a weaker hurricane making landfall, I hope this doesn't add to the large complacency factor at hand. An estimated quarter of the states population (5 Million of ~20 million) has evacuated their residence to either another state or nearby locale. In the end, if thing landfalls as a Cat 3, it will have done a lot less damage than the Cat 4/5 they were predicting to hit. It will be great that the damage lessened and lives would be put at a considerably smaller risk throughout the entire state. But, what happens the next time something like this happens? Will the thought of "They always weaken before landfall" or "We evacuated last time and nothing big happened".


THAt's a risk with every storm. And it happens after every storm.

I don't know that there's a way to prevent that. Better to over-prepare than to put people's lives at stake for the sake of "not crying wolf" all the time.


This is why I am generally not a proponent of overevacuation and tend to recommend people stay in safe places closer by. Honesty if I was in a shelter or with family in Fort Lauderdale I would want to go home and spend this storm in my own home(provided it's not in a surge zone)...but if you evacuated to Valdosta you are committed and won't be home for 4 days. It's the risk you take and many folks are fine with that. It's just not for me.


Completely agree with you on that. Not everyone has to evacuate or get out...and a shelter just isn't for me either so I don't blame them
1 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9465 Postby tallywx » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:54 am

Alyono wrote:
captain1 wrote:Long time lurker and weather nerd here - thanks to this forum I have learned so much. I do have a question about models. I have a basic, I think, understanding of how they work. What I am curious about is how they improve. I assume they incorporate actual data from a storm after the event is over and compare that to their predictions, and thereby gain reliability going forward?


not accurate at all. The computer models simply provide a numerical approximation to the Navier-Stokes equations, with sub grid scale processes paramaterized



Too bad there isn't an AI/deep learning bias correction component to the models. With all the machine learning being done these days using deep neural networks, the next generation of models should incorporate these processes in order to self-correct and improve based on "experience."
Last edited by tallywx on Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9466 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:54 am

GCANE wrote:https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/recon_AF307-2611A-IRMA.png


How far out to the East would you say those Hurricane winds extend?
0 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

Patrick99
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1772
Joined: Mon May 24, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: SW Broward, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9467 Postby Patrick99 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:58 am

PTPatrick wrote:
Michele B wrote:
thundercam96 wrote:Based on some selective trends that have been showing regarding a weaker hurricane making landfall, I hope this doesn't add to the large complacency factor at hand. An estimated quarter of the states population (5 Million of ~20 million) has evacuated their residence to either another state or nearby locale. In the end, if thing landfalls as a Cat 3, it will have done a lot less damage than the Cat 4/5 they were predicting to hit. It will be great that the damage lessened and lives would be put at a considerably smaller risk throughout the entire state. But, what happens the next time something like this happens? Will the thought of "They always weaken before landfall" or "We evacuated last time and nothing big happened".


THAt's a risk with every storm. And it happens after every storm.

I don't know that there's a way to prevent that. Better to over-prepare than to put people's lives at stake for the sake of "not crying wolf" all the time.


This is why I am generally not a proponent of overevacuation and tend to recommend people stay in safe places closer by. Honesty if I was in a shelter or with family in Fort Lauderdale I would want to go home and spend this storm in my own home(provided it's not in a surge zone)...but if you evacuated to Valdosta you are committed and won't be home for 4 days. It's the risk you take and many folks are fine with that. It's just not for me.


Social media also plays into this, with many of our out of state friends screaming "LEAVE FLORIDA NOW!" on Facebook. As you say.....evacuation isn't *always* the best decision. I was not in an evacuation zone, but had the opportunity to drive out of state...decided not to, in large part because I was worried about how I'd get back.
4 likes   

dukeblue219
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 536
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 3:52 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9468 Postby dukeblue219 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:00 am

Alyono wrote:
captain1 wrote:Long time lurker and weather nerd here - thanks to this forum I have learned so much. I do have a question about models. I have a basic, I think, understanding of how they work. What I am curious about is how they improve. I assume they incorporate actual data from a storm after the event is over and compare that to their predictions, and thereby gain reliability going forward?


not accurate at all. The computer models simply provide a numerical approximation to the Navier-Stokes equations, with sub grid scale processes paramaterized


Captain1 -- Remember that the global models are indeed global models. They aren't tracking a hurricane as a distinct entity that moves as a result of highs here, lows there, fronts coming through, and so forth, but are constantly computing how the atmosphere changes as a large continuous fluid. They're used for all kind of weather forecasting, and plotting the path of a hurricane is just one use of that data. So in that sense, the "event" is never really over. Certainly there are on-going tweaks to the computing power and to the sophistication of those computations, but someone with direct experience developing the models would have to answer if they ever make manual adjustments to process certain types of weather more realistically.
3 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9469 Postby PandaCitrus » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:00 am

What are the chances Irma keep a going west and the ridge is just stronger than the models think? This has been the trend.

Why can't Irma make the turn 50 or 100 west of the Florida peninsula and hit the big bend middle panhandle?
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9470 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:01 am

Patrick99 wrote:
PTPatrick wrote:
Michele B wrote:
THAt's a risk with every storm. And it happens after every storm.

I don't know that there's a way to prevent that. Better to over-prepare than to put people's lives at stake for the sake of "not crying wolf" all the time.


This is why I am generally not a proponent of overevacuation and tend to recommend people stay in safe places closer by. Honesty if I was in a shelter or with family in Fort Lauderdale I would want to go home and spend this storm in my own home(provided it's not in a surge zone)...but if you evacuated to Valdosta you are committed and won't be home for 4 days. It's the risk you take and many folks are fine with that. It's just not for me.


Social media also plays into this, with many of our out of state friends screaming "LEAVE FLORIDA NOW!" on Facebook. As you say.....evacuation isn't *always* the best decision. I was not in an evacuation zone, but had the opportunity to drive out of state...decided not to, in large part because I was worried about how I'd get back.


Let's have this conversation AFTER THE EVENT HAPPENS. I'm tired of hearing people justify their decisions. You do it for you, don't tell us why it's right for you.
3 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9471 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:02 am

Digital-TC-Chaser wrote:Now IRMA looks to back over water lets see how long it takes too wrap tight around the centre and fire up.



hilfyer wrote:Not seeing Irma quite clear of Cuba as some posted...EYW radar shows it straddling the coast and moving along the coast...not out to sea. Sat pix shows a good portion overland and even a good chunk offshore the south coast of Cuba feeding on those warm seas. Forecast track has it coming off the coast at 18z and she looks to be on target for that....




Image

Image
You was referring too me, centre looks off the coast too me. :)
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9472 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:03 am

PandaCitrus wrote:What are the chances Irma keep a going west and the ridge is just stronger than the models think? This has been the trend.

Why can't Irma make the turn 50 or 100 west of the Florida peninsula and hit the big bend middle panhandle?


It can, that area is inside the cone.

Image
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

stormreader

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9473 Postby stormreader » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:04 am

NDG wrote:As long Irma keeps half of its circulation over water I don't see it weakening below Cat 3, its core is still in tact. It still has a chance to strengthen before making landfall in SW FL tomorrow afternoon, over some of the warmest waters in the Atlantic Basin. IMO.

Image
Image


It has not weakened at all in the last several hours on the Cuban coast. Only weakening was down from a Cat 5 upon first diving, and making a penetration of the Cuban coast. No Cat 5 is possible doing that. But she's still a 3-4 storm on the coast! Look at that radar loop. Ready to come off the coast now, into the Straits, and is at this moment a very tightly wound up major hurricane. Gonna be some very decent intensification, I think. Highest intensity will probably be just north of the keys, if she takes that exact route--somewhere near Naples.
1 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9474 Postby SoupBone » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:08 am

NDG wrote:As long Irma keeps half of its circulation over water I don't see it weakening below Cat 3, its core is still in tact. It still has a chance to strengthen before making landfall in SW FL tomorrow afternoon, over some of the warmest waters in the Atlantic Basin. IMO.


Is it not amazing how she's doing just that?
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1115
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9475 Postby Michele B » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:08 am

Forward speed has slowed down considerably now, I see with the 11 Advisory.

I expect the next advisory shows more NW or NNW. The turn is coming.
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9476 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:09 am

saved radar loop

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Big Easy Breeze
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2017 7:52 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9477 Postby Big Easy Breeze » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:10 am

tolakram wrote:
PandaCitrus wrote:What are the chances Irma keep a going west and the ridge is just stronger than the models think? This has been the trend.

Why can't Irma make the turn 50 or 100 west of the Florida peninsula and hit the big bend middle panhandle?


It can, that area is inside the cone.

Image


Follow the NHC cone of probability. The cone of probability is dynamic; it changes. Outside of that, I do not know what else to say.

A key to the latest advisory, is not the motion, but the speed. It has slowed down quite a bit. 9 mph.
Last edited by Big Easy Breeze on Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9478 Postby PTPatrick » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:10 am

It's crazy how much Cuba took off of the size of the CDO. She looks half the size she was last night. For the pros, do you think she will still be monster size when she emerges? Or will this have tightened her up.

I've seen in past storms where land seemed to spread them out, others where they seemed to help me tighten.

You can also see that ring of dry air on radar unless it's a reflectivity thing. If it isn't a radar distance thing it'll take some time to shake that off.
Last edited by PTPatrick on Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

PandaCitrus
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:44 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9479 Postby PandaCitrus » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:12 am

Storm surge now forecast to be 10 to 15 feet along southwest Florida. I hope people there have taken Irma seriously. It's a life threatening situation on Sanibel island, Marco island, Naples, ft Myers beach, cape coral.
1 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20023
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#9480 Postby tolakram » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:13 am

 https://twitter.com/RyanMaue/status/906534996411904000




Ryan Maue ✔ @RyanMaue
All ECMWF ensembles show significant intensification once #Irma leaves Cuba. Even though storm is slightly weaker, won't be for long.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests