ATL: FLORENCE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2131
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2421 Postby BobHarlem » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:43 pm

Blown Away wrote:
You sure those are the most recent Ukmet runs?


They are, another view

Image
3 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2422 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:45 pm

More ridging on 18z NAM.
1 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2423 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:46 pm

NAM 72 hours.. much more ridging ..
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

MJGarrison
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 7:26 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2424 Postby MJGarrison » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:47 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:NAM 72 hours.. much more ridging ..


Any pics? Where can you subscribe to the NAM?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2425 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:47 pm

NAM has the latest data right?

Image
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2426 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:49 pm

With the setup at 84 hours on the NAM, where would it go from there? Any METS?
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
pgoss11
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 702
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2003 3:55 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2427 Postby pgoss11 » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:49 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.

Looks to be moving wnw at 84 hours. Maybe a Georgia or SC landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5306
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2428 Postby Nimbus » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:50 pm

Blinhart wrote:
Hurricane Andrew wrote:
txwatcher91 wrote:FWIW the NAVGEM has a Outer Banks landfall and moves it NW into VA.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0812&fh=51

Verbatim, that would be very unfortunate for the Chesapeake. And by unfortunate, I mean... :eek:


That means the Swamp wouldn't get drained, it would get flooded.


Notice at the 48 hour frame the Navgem has the weakness over Bermuda?
GFS has that pulling on the 94L remnants and keeps the ridge weak there a little longer.
Doesn't make much difference except weaker steering flow delays landfall.
1 likes   

edu2703
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 349
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2018 7:15 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2429 Postby edu2703 » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:50 pm

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10152
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2430 Postby Blown Away » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:51 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.


Image
18z NAM...

The recent models that have trended W, HWRF & NAM have accelerated Flo. So it seems if Flo gets here ahead of schedule she may go more West... Something to watch...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 26
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2431 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:51 pm

NHC mentions chance of long-term dry air issues, although Berg doesn't seem to think it will be an issue.

Code: Select all

One fly in the ointment is that the
SHIPS diagnostics are keeping mid-level relative humidities around
the cyclone around 50 percent, which isn't particularly moist, but
I'm going to assume that Florence will be able to scour out the dry
air within its circulation in the coming days.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2432 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:52 pm

if the NAM is saying anything.. is that ridging is stronger and slightly farther south. lets see.. and hope data has been ingested into the GFS 18z
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5481
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2433 Postby chaser1 » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:54 pm

pgoss11 wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.

Looks to be moving wnw at 84 hours. Maybe a Georgia or SC landfall.


That seems reasonable assuming storm position and high pressure strength/orientation accuracy
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2434 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Sep 08, 2018 3:54 pm

So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2435 Postby storm4u » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:03 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:NAM 72 hours.. much more ridging ..

12z would have been way ots if it went past 84 hours.. that should have been suspected and it's the nam in the tropics enough said
Last edited by storm4u on Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2436 Postby storm4u » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:04 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.

Don't think. Its injested until 0z
0 likes   

AutoPenalti
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4030
Age: 29
Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2437 Postby AutoPenalti » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:09 pm

storm4u wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.

Don't think. Its injested until 0z

I thought some data made it to this run...?
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.


Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)

TCVN
is a weighted averaged

txwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1498
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2438 Postby txwatcher91 » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:10 pm

At hour 78 the NAM has a weaker ridge than the 12z GFS did. Nam has a 594dm ridge and GFS a 597 one. Furthermore by hour 84 there is very little difference between the NAM and the GFS (which sends it off the OBX of NC). There is absolutely nothing on the NAM that indicates a track that would head for Florida or Georgia and I wouldn’t use it past 48 hours especially for tropical activity. The 18z GFS should give us a better idea of what changes the balloon data may contribute.
3 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2439 Postby tallywx » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:10 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:
storm4u wrote:
AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.

Don't think. Its injested until 0z

I thought some data made it to this run...?


The first sounding wasn't taken until 17:59z. No way that made it into 18z initialization. https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/recon/# ... 6AFLORENCE
2 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: FLORENCE - Models

#2440 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Sat Sep 08, 2018 4:12 pm

Anyone able to confirm new data about environment made it into 18z model runs?
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2018”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests