Blown Away wrote:
You sure those are the most recent Ukmet runs?
They are, another view

Moderator: S2k Moderators
Blown Away wrote:
You sure those are the most recent Ukmet runs?
Aric Dunn wrote:NAM 72 hours.. much more ridging ..
tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.
Blinhart wrote:Hurricane Andrew wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:FWIW the NAVGEM has a Outer Banks landfall and moves it NW into VA.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 0812&fh=51
Verbatim, that would be very unfortunate for the Chesapeake. And by unfortunate, I mean...
That means the Swamp wouldn't get drained, it would get flooded.
tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.
Code: Select all
One fly in the ointment is that the
SHIPS diagnostics are keeping mid-level relative humidities around
the cyclone around 50 percent, which isn't particularly moist, but
I'm going to assume that Florence will be able to scour out the dry
air within its circulation in the coming days.
pgoss11 wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:More ridging on 18z NAM.
Looks to be moving wnw at 84 hours. Maybe a Georgia or SC landfall.
Aric Dunn wrote:NAM 72 hours.. much more ridging ..
AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.
storm4u wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.
Don't think. Its injested until 0z
AutoPenalti wrote:storm4u wrote:AutoPenalti wrote:So far with the new data from the balloons, the synoptic runs seem to push this further west, the main guidance seem to push this further east.
Don't think. Its injested until 0z
I thought some data made it to this run...?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests