ATL: BARRY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
BRweather
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 331
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 8:50 am
Location: Baton Rouge, LA

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#761 Postby BRweather » Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:58 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
SoupBone wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:

The NAM yes.. Poor choice not to pay attention to the UKMET.


Aric, could you explain why?


UKMET is one of the most reliable models.. besides florence last year it often sniffs out ridge strength. so we are cutting hairs here. The last 3 runs of the ukmet has reliably had the ridge strength correct and the extent.


Yes, but I think the front will be more important in the long run than the ridge. The front is providing the weakness and if it is present then it really has no chance to get caught under the ridge. The UKMET does not model the front correctly, IMO.

I could be wrong, but looking at the radar throughout the day and what the UKMET modeled....something doesn't match up.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#762 Postby Hurricaneman » Wed Jul 10, 2019 8:58 pm

gatorcane wrote:Looks like the NAM out through 9 hours is weaker and has shifted east.

Bad initialization so in should be tossed
0 likes   

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5300
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#763 Postby Nimbus » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:10 pm

Sounds as though some of the models are amplifying and digging that second cold front south to pick up two? Now if this could just drag a big slug of dry air over from Texas before landfall..
The environment has been a little dry to the west of the system but no way to get that dry air into the core without just the right kind of shear.
0 likes   

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#764 Postby SoupBone » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:20 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
SoupBone wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:

The NAM yes.. Poor choice not to pay attention to the UKMET.


Aric, could you explain why?


UKMET is one of the most reliable models.. besides florence last year it often sniffs out ridge strength. so we are cutting hairs here. The last 3 runs of the ukmet has reliably had the ridge strength correct and the extent.



Thanks for the explanation.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#765 Postby Roxy » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:26 pm

ahhh, the wibble wobble game. This is why I depend on Storm2k for my inside info. Don't tell your neighbors unless they want to donate.

I will take some rain in Houston, in decent amounts of course.

where is that donate link again???
1 likes   

hohnywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 508
Age: 34
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:34 pm
Location: Hastings-on-Hudson, NY

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#766 Postby hohnywx » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:34 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like the NAM out through 9 hours is weaker and has shifted east.

Bad initialization so in should be tossed


It’s the NAM...it should always be tossed
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#767 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:45 pm

hohnywx wrote:
Hurricaneman wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Looks like the NAM out through 9 hours is weaker and has shifted east.

Bad initialization so in should be tossed


It’s the NAM...it should always be tossed


Entertainment, but it's the only thing out this hour. You know to occasionally expect random and usually inconsistent solutions. Latest 3km through 44 shows a move south and then basically a stall for about a day before moving toward SELA at 954. So it organizes while it spins but doesn't spend that much time out on the water. I was hoping for 883mb again, but that was probably being greedy. It did drop 13mb right at landfall.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 1100&fh=44

edit - gets to 944 at landfall valid 52 hours
Last edited by Steve on Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
2 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#768 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:46 pm

10pm NHC update

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
ScottNAtlanta
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2367
Joined: Sat May 25, 2013 3:11 pm
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#769 Postby ScottNAtlanta » Wed Jul 10, 2019 9:50 pm

where is that donate link again???


There is a "donate with paypal" link on the top right of the page :sun:
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#770 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:04 pm

NHC shifts east over to about Bayou Teche - New Iberia/Franklin and reduced the maximum windspeed to 75. Presumably slightly less time over water yields the 10mph maximum wind reduction. Landfall is Saturday afternoon so a little over 65 or so hours as they see it.

I find it really kind of weird being this close and not having a clue what I'm going to be facing. It could be barely some fringe elements to biblical rainfall to a possible brush with an inner core and powerline & treelimb issues. I'm going to try to stay and model watch, but I can't post images from this device easily.
2 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#771 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:14 pm

Something tells me it won’t be just barely fringe
elements in SE LA.

Steve wrote:NHC shifts east over to about Bayou Teche - New Iberia/Franklin and reduced the maximum windspeed to 75. Presumably slightly less time over water yields the 10mph maximum wind reduction. Landfall is Saturday afternoon so a little over 65 or so hours as they see it.

I find it really kind of weird being this close and not having a clue what I'm going to be facing. It could be barely some fringe elements to biblical rainfall to a possible brush with an inner core and powerline & treelimb issues. I'm going to try to stay and model watch, but I can't post images from this device easily.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#772 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:28 pm

Word. But we're going to see. It's hard to discount the western models completely. And the farther west landfall is, the less we're going to see. That would be particularly true at least a little while as many models have depicted the northern portion of the storm to not have as much associated weather for the bands and structure. That also remains to be seen though it's plausible to me. Maybe it fills in a bit toward landfall if it is intensifying then? Where it's progged now would mean some decent squalls and feeder bands. Hopefully we won't see a ton more training because today was already enough, but you already know how that goes. Also where the NHC has it puts the super rainfall probably across Lafourche and St. Charles and then into what they call the River Parishes. We'd get several more inches but probably not the catastrophic levels that will be 35-50 miles west of here. If it landfalls farther east, those bets are off. Then if the hurricane models are right, there's going to be damage, power outages, downed trees and power lines and the other things that come with a Category 1. We're in good shape at the crib but we might have to deal with garbage cans, hoses, plants and outdoor stuff which we're waiting to handle later if necessary since it won't take 10 minutes to deal with.

GFS ought to be next. For now, SFWMD shows some coalescing around Terrebonne or St. Mary Parishes.
https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#773 Postby ROCK » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:34 pm

I would wait for it.. :D CMC and UKMet can’t be tossed..NAM yes lol UKMET is right up there with EURO. If the EURO shifts west tonight :eek: the more SW it dives tonight the more west it will be at landfall. It’s still a very dynamic situation where climo suggests stronger ridging and not some bad ass front diving into the lower 48 lmao..
1 likes   

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#774 Postby sphelps8681 » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:35 pm

Steve wrote:Word. But we're going to see. It's hard to discount the western models completely. And the farther west landfall is, the less we're going to see. That would be particularly true at least a little while as many models have depicted the northern portion of the storm to not have as much associated weather for the bands and structure. That also remains to be seen though it's plausible to me. Maybe it fills in a bit toward landfall if it is intensifying then? Where it's progged now would mean some decent squalls and feeder bands. Hopefully we won't see a ton more training because today was already enough, but you already know how that goes. Also where the NHC has it puts the super rainfall probably across Lafourche and St. Charles and then into what they call the River Parishes. We'd get several more inches but probably not the catastrophic levels that will be 35-50 miles west of here. If it landfalls farther east, those bets are off. Then if the hurricane models are right, there's going to be damage, power outages, downed trees and power lines and the other things that come with a Category 1. We're in good shape at the crib but we might have to deal with garbage cans, hoses, plants and outdoor stuff which we're waiting to handle later if necessary since it won't take 10 minutes to deal with.

GFS ought to be next. For now, SFWMD shows some coalescing around Terrebonne or St. Mary Parishes.
https://www.sfwmd.gov/weather-radar/hur ... odel-plots


Be safe and good luck. Let us know if you need anything.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#775 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:43 pm

It's going okay on the GFS which is showing 1003 tomorrow night at 7. We'll see how it handles Friday and Saturday, but I don't expect it to show it petering out. It's not supposed to be a textbook cat 5 in the western Atlantic, and it's July, so you get what you get. Some people felt like low end Cat 2 might be the ceiling. I don't think it's that high without a stall or a farther westward track than the NHC has. I'm going to predict this run of the GFS will take it down into the mid 980's and possibly 10mb or so lower. As it is at 48 hours, it's about 991, so that might be a good guess.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blinhart
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2079
Age: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2011 3:13 pm
Location: Crowley, La.

Re: RE: Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#776 Postby Blinhart » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:50 pm

w5yne wrote:
jlauderdal wrote:
w5yne wrote:I have been on this forum for a while and find it great how much you guys put into what you do, that said the NHC are normally on the ball with storm tracks
NHC is locked in on the track at 3 days out, if you are on the line or 30 miles either side except to take the eyewall..they have been that good the last couple of years

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk



Eye is on track to pass right over my house as of now :eek:


And if your like me, I don't like that.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#777 Postby SoupBone » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:51 pm

GFS has it bouncing around then moving in on top of Terrebonne Parish. That's a good bit east of the previous run.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#778 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:53 pm

Landfall Saturday low 990's so borderline TS/low end 1? We'll see how fast it moves out. Looks east of the 18z and slightly east of the 12z but also slightly weaker than 12z. Slow movement through SELA into SWMS taking about 24 hours to get to up around Bogalusa and Franklinton. Near landfall and post landfall seems to be where all the weather is too, because GFS progs us with very little rain before landfall (I think way underdone). But it does put is in the foot or so of rainfall as it's passing through.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 1100&fh=78
1 likes   

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#779 Postby Wx_Warrior » Wed Jul 10, 2019 10:55 pm

0z GFS

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: TWO - Models

#780 Postby Steve » Wed Jul 10, 2019 11:00 pm

Looks to be a hair south of Jackson at 90 hours, so it's moving slowly north at maybe 05 degrees so essentially north for that period.

Legacy GFS is slightly east and faster out.
https://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysi ... 1100&fh=96

CMC is running now and hurricanes ought to be soon.
1 likes   


Return to “2019”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests