Aric Dunn wrote:SoupBone wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
The NAM yes.. Poor choice not to pay attention to the UKMET.
Aric, could you explain why?
UKMET is one of the most reliable models.. besides florence last year it often sniffs out ridge strength. so we are cutting hairs here. The last 3 runs of the ukmet has reliably had the ridge strength correct and the extent.
Yes, but I think the front will be more important in the long run than the ridge. The front is providing the weakness and if it is present then it really has no chance to get caught under the ridge. The UKMET does not model the front correctly, IMO.
I could be wrong, but looking at the radar throughout the day and what the UKMET modeled....something doesn't match up.