Will Dr. Gray's numbers go down in September ?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

Will Dr. Gray's numbers go down in September ?

Yes - He will lower his numbers for 2005
43
43%
No - He will not lower his numbers for 2005
57
57%
 
Total votes: 100

Message
Author
User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

Will Dr. Gray's numbers go down in September ?

#1 Postby dhweather » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:46 am

Will Dr. Gray's numbers go down in September ?

Climatology vs. SAL

We should be approaching the peak of activity for any given hurricane season.

The SAL has been persistently wreaking havoc on waves as they move
across the Atlantic, and shows few signs of letting up.

The MJO is becoming more favorable.

So a quick straw poll - what do you think. Feel free to comment on your thoughts!
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#2 Postby WeatherEmperor » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:48 am

Im not sure. I think he predicted 4-5 named storms for August and so far we have had 2. It certainly is possible to have another 2 more named storms before the end of the month but its tough to say.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#3 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:50 am

yes

If he uped his numbers because of an active July, he will lower his number because of a quiet August. Of course this is assuming that only 1 or 2 more storms at most form this month. If it suddenly starts getting active again well then forget about it.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxwatcher91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1606
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Keene, NH
Contact:

#4 Postby wxwatcher91 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:50 am

hey! where's the "maybe" option??? :lol:
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#5 Postby dwg71 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:53 am

I voted he will lower his numbers, especially if we dont see a flair up in the next week. We have till the 27th of August to get jose or we will be 3 full storms behind 1995 pace.
0 likes   

RU4REAL
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 12:56 pm
Location: NORTH CAROLINA

#6 Postby RU4REAL » Thu Aug 18, 2005 10:55 am

I say no, he want lower his numbers, looking at the coast the dry air is almost gone, moist air is building in and will make much better conditions.
I think when the wave that's on the coast now emerges, you can pretty much look for a lift in activity. IMO :D
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#7 Postby WindRunner » Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:07 am

It's all dependent on the next two weeks. If we have just 2-3 storms, than no (how I voted). If the shear keeps ripping up great-looking waves, than I wouldn't be surprised by a lowering of the numbers.
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#8 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 11:41 am

I think he will - since Emily, the season has shown only a modest amount of activity - nothing like the dramatic statistics given before the season began.

When you consider that Dennis made landfall way back on 7/10, and Emily on 7/20, and with September less than two weeks away, it's becoming less likely (though certainly still possible) that the season will be as busy as he or others had forecast.

Some may disagree, but, if I'm not mistaken, end of season statistics will show that most Atlantic hurricane seasons end (activity-wise) after late September or early October, with only a small number ending during the mid-October to November period, so, it's very possible that the season only has about another 6-7 weeks of activity remaining - with a long way to go to prove their forecasts correct.

Frank
0 likes   

Jim Hughes
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 1:52 pm
Location: Martinsburg West Virginia

#9 Postby Jim Hughes » Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:18 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:Im not sure. I think he predicted 4-5 named storms for August and so far we have had 2. It certainly is possible to have another 2 more named storms before the end of the month but its tough to say.

<RICKY>


Dr. Gray said that there would be five named storms, three hurricanes, one intense. Harvey was already present when he made this forecast. So only one of the four has showed up for the big dance so far.

His outlook would have been very hard to reach if Irene had not finally made it to hurricane strength. He still has plenty of time though.


Jim
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6853
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

#10 Postby LarryWx » Thu Aug 18, 2005 12:34 pm

Frank2 wrote:Some may disagree, but, if I'm not mistaken, end of season statistics will show that most Atlantic hurricane seasons end (activity-wise) after late September or early October, with only a small number ending during the mid-October to November period, so, it's very possible that the season only has about another 6-7 weeks of activity remaining - with a long way to go to prove their forecasts correct.

Frank


I agree that the bulk of the season (~90%) is over by ~10/15 in terms of # NS on average. However, on the same token, only 3 NS (only 30% of the total season) have formed on average through today going back to 1950. So, on average, we still have ~70% of the season to go and we're currently sitting at 300% of the normal # of NS as of 8/18 (9 vs. 3)!

The period 8/1-18, even with just 2 NS to date, is still above the 1950-2004 average, which is only ~1.3. Even when just looking at the very active 1995-2004 period EXCLUDING 1997, the period 8/1-18 has yielded only 1.7 NS. Compare this to the 8/1-31 figure of 4.3. In other words, 8/1-18 yielded only ~40% of the total AUG activity for these very active years. We've still got 60%/2.6 NS to go for the rest of AUG in that sense! Also, keep in mind that if former TD #10 were to regenerate into a NS after today, it would still count as an 8/1-18 storm for stat. purposes. So, we could still end up with THREE NS for 8/1-18, whcih would be well above average.

Regarding Dr. Gray: if he were updating as of today, I'd say using the info I just mentioned that he'd leave the # of NS about the same. Regarding his 9/1 update, it obviously depends a lot on how the rest of August goes. The Aug story is FAR from over.

I've already predicted three NS to first become a TD during 8/16-31 and am sticking with that. That would EXCLUDE ex-TD #10 should it regenerate and reach NS status being that it first became a TD on 8/13.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#11 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:03 pm

Yes, what you mention is true, though I was also looking at the season in terms of the overall predictions made for the current year.

Since the U.S. has been fortunately to only have one landfalling hurricane so far, the season is much better (as far as the public is concerned) than predicted, though as you said, statistically the bulk of the season is still in the weeks ahead.

Frank
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#12 Postby ohiostorm » Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:09 pm

No. We have alot of season to go through yet and everyone seems to think that it will be one hell of an active one.
0 likes   

mascpa
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 500
Age: 70
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 10:43 am
Location: Jupiter, FL
Contact:

#13 Postby mascpa » Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:09 pm

Undoubtedly he will reduce his numbers.
0 likes   

mahicks
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:25 pm

#14 Postby mahicks » Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:12 pm

Lol...I voted NO and expected to look like an idiot when the poll results popped up...

I was the split vote! It's Tied!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Trader Ron
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 7:25 pm
Location: Naples,Fl
Contact:

#15 Postby Trader Ron » Thu Aug 18, 2005 1:52 pm

I believe he will lower to 18 named storms. :D
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#16 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:14 pm

Yes, I agree that he will not lower it a great deal, but I'd be very surprised if he doesn't lower it by some measure - the season is just not progressing as predicted (fortunately).

Frank
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 148499
Age: 69
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#17 Postby cycloneye » Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:20 pm

In my view he will lower the numbers but only by 2-3.What I will look for in his update is the reasoning for the downgrade in other words what factors are causing him to lower the numbers.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

#18 Postby Frank2 » Thu Aug 18, 2005 2:21 pm

Yes - that would be interesting reading.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#19 Postby dhweather » Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:28 pm

There are no real predictors for the SAL, and it's been very active this year. For that reason, I think Dr. Gray will lower his numbers by two, maybe three.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#20 Postby WindRunner » Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:41 pm

That sounds about right, and the reasoning would be very interesting, give us something more to watch for other than the 12 things we already watch! :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: aspen, NotSparta, Team Ghost and 56 guests