MODELS hitting Florida Peninsula Twice? NHC too far west???
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5

- Posts: 5598
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
MODELS hitting Florida Peninsula Twice? NHC too far west???
See the models
Is NHC too far West right now???
See it:
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tr ... model.html
Is NHC too far West right now???
See it:
http://www.wunderground.com/tropical/tr ... model.html
0 likes
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5

- Posts: 5280
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
- LAwxrgal
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1763
- Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
- Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)
The GFS is apparently onto something, it's the 4th run in a row that had the storm riding the coast, and the rest of the models are following suit. Keep in mind the forecast is still subject to large errors because they still don't quite know exactly WHERE the weakness in the ridge will be.
Last edited by LAwxrgal on Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends
Wake me up when November ends
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
LAwxrgal wrote:The GFS is apparently onto something, it's the 4th run in a row that had the storm riding the coast, and the rest of the models are following suit.
It's that Viper model people have been talking about.
Oh but seriously Katrina is not even in the GOM yet. She may not even make it to the Fl. coastline for her first landfall as crazy as the models have shifted the last few runs.
0 likes
- dixiebreeze
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5140
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 5:07 pm
- Location: crystal river, fla.
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
I think the models have initially been overstating the strength of the ridge off the eastern US. The same thing happened with Irene, which was initially supposed to hit NC. The NHC and the local NWS offices were discarding the GFS yesterday (granted, it was going out on a limb), but today the other models have shifted more in line with it. I suspect a rightward adjustment in the forecast track at 5 pm.
0 likes
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
- ALhurricane
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 452
- Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 12:46 pm
- Location: Daphne, AL
On the flip side of the coin, the ECMWF shows a W FL Panhandle landfall...consistent for five runs in row.
I do not buy the GFS solution at all. With the ridge filling in to the north, it will force Katrina to go WNW across FL and into the Gulf. The GFSs upper level forecast do not coincide with its sfc low movement. How do you have a 10-20 kt western steering flow in the upper levels, but hardly move the surface circulation? That just does not add up.
I do not buy the GFS solution at all. With the ridge filling in to the north, it will force Katrina to go WNW across FL and into the Gulf. The GFSs upper level forecast do not coincide with its sfc low movement. How do you have a 10-20 kt western steering flow in the upper levels, but hardly move the surface circulation? That just does not add up.
0 likes
flair wrote:I think the models have initially been overstating the strength of the ridge off the eastern US. The same thing happened with Irene, which was initially supposed to hit NC. The NHC and the local NWS offices were discarding the GFS yesterday (granted, it was going out on a limb), but today the other models have shifted more in line with it. I suspect a rightward adjustment in the forecast track at 5 pm.
Only people saying that Irene was going to hit NC were speculators... NHC and associated agencies never forecast a landfall. While there were a couple of models that had runs that brought Irene ashore, the conesuses never did so.
GFDL's 12Z forecast is a leftward shift from its previous run (which was again, a leftward shift). NOGAPS came in slightly right, but still indicates Mobile/Pensacola landfall in its 12Z forecast. With that, CONU is still going to indicate a panhandle landfall.
0 likes
- Tampa Bay Hurricane
- Category 5

- Posts: 5598
- Age: 37
- Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
I was just pointing these out since I wanted to make the point that
the west coast of Florida will likely feel strong impacts as the
storm passes just to our west/SW.
I was just pointing these out since I wanted to make the point that
the west coast of Florida will likely feel strong impacts as the
storm passes just to our west/SW.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Rainband
More models are starting to come in line with the gfs..If it was just the GFS I'd beALhurricane wrote:On the flip side of the coin, the ECMWF shows a W FL Panhandle landfall...consistent for five runs in row.
I do not buy the GFS solution at all. With the ridge filling in to the north, it will force Katrina to go WNW across FL and into the Gulf. The GFSs upper level forecast do not coincide with its sfc low movement. How do you have a 10-20 kt western steering flow in the upper levels, but hardly move the surface circulation? That just does not add up.
0 likes
-
gkrangers
Which ones?Rainband wrote:More models are starting to come in line with the gfs..If it was just the GFS I'd beALhurricane wrote:On the flip side of the coin, the ECMWF shows a W FL Panhandle landfall...consistent for five runs in row.
I do not buy the GFS solution at all. With the ridge filling in to the north, it will force Katrina to go WNW across FL and into the Gulf. The GFSs upper level forecast do not coincide with its sfc low movement. How do you have a 10-20 kt western steering flow in the upper levels, but hardly move the surface circulation? That just does not add up.
0 likes
-
Rainband
the cmc and the UKmetgkrangers wrote:Which ones?Rainband wrote:More models are starting to come in line with the gfs..If it was just the GFS I'd beALhurricane wrote:On the flip side of the coin, the ECMWF shows a W FL Panhandle landfall...consistent for five runs in row.
I do not buy the GFS solution at all. With the ridge filling in to the north, it will force Katrina to go WNW across FL and into the Gulf. The GFSs upper level forecast do not coincide with its sfc low movement. How do you have a 10-20 kt western steering flow in the upper levels, but hardly move the surface circulation? That just does not add up.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... =Animation
0 likes
-
floridahurricaneguy
- Category 1

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:37 pm
- Location: Tampa,FL
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], riapal, Sciencerocks and 256 guests

