New track is right over N.O.!
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Stormcenter
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 6685
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
- Location: Houston, TX
New track is right over N.O.!
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
mtm4319 wrote:The forecast track looks probably a little more like this (yellow line; the white line was the 11pm forecast track):
This would put it just west of the city. Maybe 90.1 W at New Orleans's latitude.
OFFICIAL IS 89.9 WHICH IS THE MS/LA line.....shift of about 20 miles west from 11pm to 5am
STILL EAST of the City
0 likes
rtd2 wrote:OFFICIAL IS 89.9 WHICH IS THE MS/LA line.....shift of about 20 miles west from 11pm to 5am
STILL EAST of the City
I know that, but a mere connecting the dots with a straight line probably isn't the most accurate way. Notice that the 96-hour point is at 87.5 west, which means it's recurving.
Do you really expect it to ride the 90-degree parallel exactly? It's more plausible to think it will go just west of 90, then start curving back and hit 90 again at the point where NHC shows.
And 89.6 is the MS/LA line.
0 likes
mtm4319 wrote:rtd2 wrote:OFFICIAL IS 89.9 WHICH IS THE MS/LA line.....shift of about 20 miles west from 11pm to 5am
STILL EAST of the City
I know that, but a mere connecting the dots with a straight line probably isn't the most accurate way. Notice that the 96-hour point is at 87.5 west, which means it's recurving.
Do you really expect it to ride the 90-degree parallel exactly? It's more plausible to think it will go just west of 90, then start curving back and hit 90 again at the point where NHC shows.
And 89.6 is the MS/LA line.
No but the Panic button Changes When you talk about a L/F east or west of you. I dont expect it to Go due North In fact I wouldnt be suprised to see an IVAN type Recuve at the last minute.
0 likes
Please dont anyone bash me, but the thing that bothers me here is the fact that a couple of bad storms (Ivan, Dennis) in the last year have been coming directly at us, and have recurved ever so slightly to the NE, or turned northeast late in the game, to barely avoid a direct hit. We have been very lucky, The thing I have been dreading most was when one would be forecast to make landfall to the west of us. This one definitely is starting to really worry me now
0 likes
If that track were to verify (and we know it won't exactly), depending on the size of the eye, I either get northern eyewall-eye-southern eyewall or I get western eyewall. My dad's house is right where the forecast line meets Lake Pontchartrain. I'm a bit south of the middle of the lake (kind of due south from the Causeway).
Track appears to landfall just east of Grand Isle in Lower Plaquemines Parish +/- Barataria Bay. Here are some points of reference.
Plaquemines Parish:
http://www.enlou.com/maps/plaquemines_map.htm
Jefferson Parish
http://www.enlou.com/maps/jefferson_map.htm
It appears we're nearing the end of the western adjustment to the track. One would think that future changes would be toward the east and then maybe back some. Looks like it's coming down to how sharp of a right hand turn Katrina wants to make. On satellite, Katrina appears to be due south of last night's track near Apalachacola. All points between there and Lafourche/Terrebonne Parishes (2 Parishes immediately to the west of southern Jefferson) make the landfall cut. Unless Katrina was to continue westward or stall out, it looks like points on either side of that can at least wipe a little sweat off their brows while continuing to pay very close attention to developments. THIS IS NOT A FORECAST but simply an idea played off of the theory put out by the NHC and computer models that Katrina will turn from W to N over a period of 48-60 hours.
Steve
Track appears to landfall just east of Grand Isle in Lower Plaquemines Parish +/- Barataria Bay. Here are some points of reference.
Plaquemines Parish:
http://www.enlou.com/maps/plaquemines_map.htm
Jefferson Parish
http://www.enlou.com/maps/jefferson_map.htm
It appears we're nearing the end of the western adjustment to the track. One would think that future changes would be toward the east and then maybe back some. Looks like it's coming down to how sharp of a right hand turn Katrina wants to make. On satellite, Katrina appears to be due south of last night's track near Apalachacola. All points between there and Lafourche/Terrebonne Parishes (2 Parishes immediately to the west of southern Jefferson) make the landfall cut. Unless Katrina was to continue westward or stall out, it looks like points on either side of that can at least wipe a little sweat off their brows while continuing to pay very close attention to developments. THIS IS NOT A FORECAST but simply an idea played off of the theory put out by the NHC and computer models that Katrina will turn from W to N over a period of 48-60 hours.
Steve
Last edited by Steve on Sat Aug 27, 2005 4:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
Matt-hurricanewatcher
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hammy, HurricaneFan, Team Ghost, wwizard and 302 guests


