We may have a cat 5 on our hands!! no doubt

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K

how stong will katrina get?

It is in the best condition that it is going to get in!
2
1%
med strength cat 3
9
5%
strong cat 3/boarderline cat 4
16
9%
med strength cat 4
27
15%
stong cat 4/boarderline cat 5
91
50%
med strength cat 5 (to me 160-180)
23
13%
Strong cat 5 (to me 180-200)
5
3%
unbilevably stong cat 5 (200 Mph+)
8
4%
 
Total votes: 181

Message
Author
mtm4319
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 2:47 am
Location: Mobile, AL

#21 Postby mtm4319 » Sat Aug 27, 2005 12:58 pm

WindRunner wrote:
mtm4319 wrote:Bump. With the rise in pressure, cat 5 is looking more unlikely to me.


I wouldn't drop the consideration yet. It's just a little ERC before she bombs again (another 44mbs over next 24 hrs :?: :lol: ) I voted borderline 4/5 myself, though.


It's certainly not out of the question, but I'd break it down as follows:

15% chance of a cat 5 (a bit higher than what NHC has it)
60% chance of a cat 4
20% chance of a cat 3
5% chance of a cat 2 or weaker at landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve Cosby
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 525
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
Location: Northwest Arkansas

#22 Postby Steve Cosby » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:06 pm

5's require such a perfect confluence of environmental conditions that it just doesn't seem likely. Also, the weakening trend of the storms hitting the central gulf coast this year is in the back of my mind.

That said, NEXRAD's analysis relating to high oceanic conductivity may well bear out. In that case, if other influences are less than optimal, this potential for increased convective activity in that location will push Katrina over the edge to being a Category 5. (See http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=71575)

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#23 Postby WindRunner » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:42 pm

mtm4319 wrote:
WindRunner wrote:
mtm4319 wrote:Bump. With the rise in pressure, cat 5 is looking more unlikely to me.


I wouldn't drop the consideration yet. It's just a little ERC before she bombs again (another 44mbs over next 24 hrs :?: :lol: ) I voted borderline 4/5 myself, though.


It's certainly not out of the question, but I'd break it down as follows:

15% chance of a cat 5 (a bit higher than what NHC has it)
60% chance of a cat 4
20% chance of a cat 3
5% chance of a cat 2 or weaker at landfall.


Yeah, that looks about right.
0 likes   

oneness
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:21 am

#24 Postby oneness » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:45 pm

mtm4319 wrote:Bump. With the rise in pressure, cat 5 is looking more unlikely to me.


That transient fluctuation in pressure is the pressure version of wobble-itis. Look at the trend of the measured recent details, and then at the measured and projected conditions, then the official forecast.

This is Russian roulette.

Don’t get mesmerised or paralysed by it, just move out of the way in time. Drowning is awful, and realising that all hope is lost and that your last living act will be to deeply breathe in muddy water is not what you want come Monday morning. Don't guess, don't gamble, just evacuate. Good luck.
Last edited by oneness on Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

wayoutfront

#25 Postby wayoutfront » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:46 pm

stong cat 4/boarderline cat 5

is there a weak cat 4?

If she tracks 100 miles east or 100 miles west of current model cluster I would say cat 3

Bump. With the rise in pressure, cat 5 is looking more unlikely to me.


once the ewrc is complete , it will drop extemely fast. back to the 940 range..
Last edited by wayoutfront on Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cjrciadt
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Kissimmee, FL

#26 Postby cjrciadt » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:46 pm

Look at Ivan:http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/at200409.asp
From 948 up to 968, then marching to 910 peak, with cooler water BTW.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#27 Postby Scorpion » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:50 pm

Well for what its worth, GFDL gives it 916 mb.
0 likes   

User avatar
cjrciadt
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 1:11 pm
Location: Kissimmee, FL

#28 Postby cjrciadt » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:51 pm

Scorpion wrote:Well for what its worth, GFDL gives it 916 mb.
Just saved the image, very historic if it pans out. :grr:
0 likes   

smashmode
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 173
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:05 pm

#29 Postby smashmode » Sat Aug 27, 2005 1:58 pm

okay who are the folks who are picking 170-200+ mph?

any reason for this type of speculation? other than trolling?
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5240
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

#30 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:00 pm

It's just going through the typical eyewall replacement cycle right now. Pressure often rises a bit and winds drop a bit during this time, but then they come back stronger than ever.
0 likes   

User avatar
The Big Dog
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1039
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 8:30 am
Location: West Palm Beach, FL

#31 Postby The Big Dog » Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:02 pm

smashmode wrote:okay who are the folks who are picking 170-200+ mph?

any reason for this type of speculation? other than trolling?

Well... notice they're not posting anything?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: chaser1, Extratropical94, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], JoshwaDone and 236 guests