Will they rebuild New Orleans if it hits as a Cat 5?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
logybogy
Will they rebuild New Orleans if it hits as a Cat 5?
If it comes in as a Cat 4/5 and the entire city is destroyed and in 20 feet of toxic sludge containing sewage and chemicals for 6 months, would they even rebuild the city?
It would probably make more sense to rebuild "New New Orleans" on higher ground or at least invest in 50 feet levees. Aren't the levees around St. Louis 50ft tall? Why are they so low around New Orleans? They've known about the doomsday scenario for decades.
It would probably make more sense to rebuild "New New Orleans" on higher ground or at least invest in 50 feet levees. Aren't the levees around St. Louis 50ft tall? Why are they so low around New Orleans? They've known about the doomsday scenario for decades.
0 likes
Re: Will they rebuild New Orleans if it hits as a Cat 5?
logybogy wrote:If it comes in as a Cat 4/5 and the entire city is destroyed and in 20 feet of toxic sludge containing sewage and chemicals for 6 months, would they even rebuild the city?
It would probably make more sense to rebuild "New New Orleans" on higher ground or at least invest in 50 feet levees. Aren't the levees around St. Louis 50ft tall? Why are they so low around New Orleans? They've known about the doomsday scenario for decades.
??huh?? A bit early for the gloom and doom don't ya think???
0 likes
-
logybogy
-
kevin
Only about 48 hours too early if you believe the reports that have come out. I'm also skeptical because I put a lot more faith in engineering than most people do, and I know reports have to cover themselves by puting the worst out there instead of the probable.
The city would be rebuilt. People would want that I figure. Also its a port, and a pretty important one I believe. Seeing it is on the end of the Mississippi River.
The city would be rebuilt. People would want that I figure. Also its a port, and a pretty important one I believe. Seeing it is on the end of the Mississippi River.
0 likes
-
Stratosphere747
- Category 5

- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
kevin wrote:Only about 48 hours too early if you believe the reports that have come out. I'm also skeptical because I put a lot more faith in engineering than most people do, and I know reports have to cover themselves by puting the worst out there instead of the probable.
The city would be rebuilt. People would want that I figure. Also its a port, and a pretty important one I believe. Seeing it is on the end of the Mississippi River.
IF and that is a big IF Kevin, depending on the severity of the damage I don't know if our economy could handle the cost.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
I'm not much into the doom and gloom posts myself. With every hurricane that comes, the postings of how bad and awful it's going to be are ALWAYS worse than what actually happens. I'm not saying it's not going to be bad but buildings and homes are built alot better than they use to be...It will be bad, but not doom and gloom. This storm MAY still go east or west of New Orleans.
0 likes
Even if Katrina made landfall south or east of New Orleans, and caused there to be a significant surge from Lake Pontchartrain, I would not expect the city to be "entirely destroyed." There would be damage along the lake front, and high rises might have missing glass, but the total devastation scenarios (maybe hinted at by some of those Hollywood films) are really far-fetched.
- Jay
KSC FL
- Jay
KSC FL
0 likes
ConvergenceZone wrote:I'm not much into the doom and gloom posts myself. With every hurricane that comes, the postings of how bad and awful it's going to be are ALWAYS worse than what actually happens. I'm not saying it's not going to be bad but buildings and homes are built alot better than they use to be...It will be bad, but not doom and gloom. This storm MAY still go east or west of New Orleans.
And I guess that's my point. For the utter catastrophic sceanero to play out, Katrina would have to hit at an exact point. No doubt it will be bad if that eye is anywhere near NO at Cat 4, but it will depend on where she ultimately hits land in the final analysis. As bad as the models look, she can still wobble to the east or west...
But I still would get the heck out of dodge right now, that's for sure.
0 likes
- ConvergenceZone
- Category 5

- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
- Location: Northern California
-
simplykristi
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
- Location: Near KCMO
- Contact:
even if a cat 4 hits from the south..new orleans will still be there.....its a ways from the coast..the only way a city could be "destroyed" by a hurricane is if its really a coastal city (i mean coastal, like beachfront) and takes a full ocean surge......
gloom and doomsdayers be darned....book your mardis gras plans...nola aint going anywhere.
gloom and doomsdayers be darned....book your mardis gras plans...nola aint going anywhere.
Last edited by djtil on Sat Aug 27, 2005 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
inotherwords
- Category 2

- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Nokomis, FL
NEXRAD wrote:Even if Katrina made landfall south or east of New Orleans, and caused there to be a significant surge from Lake Pontchartrain, I would not expect the city to be "entirely destroyed." There would be damage along the lake front, and high rises might have missing glass, but the total devastation scenarios (maybe hinted at by some of those Hollywood films) are really far-fetched.
- Jay
KSC FL
Jay's right. I lived in San Francisco before Loma Prieta and everyone was talking doom and gloom about "the big one" hitting the city and leveling it like it did in 1906. Granted, Loma Prieta wasn't as huge as it might have been, but it was close to a seven pointer, and that's nothing to sneeze at. I think all of SF would have predicted the city would have been in rubble with a 6.8 or 6.9 but what we ended up with wasn't too bad at all. Sad that a small section of double decker freeway collapsed and some people died there, but other than that there were very few fatalities and building damage was far less than people thought it would be.
So let's see what happens. I hope that beautiful city survives, it's really a special place.
0 likes
The Port of New Orleans is the busiest port in the western hemisphere and the fourth busiest in the world. They'd rebuild that.
Now, they might rebuild the residential sections farther away. Or they build medium density housing to replace the low density housing, and make a taller, but shorter levee.
I don't think the Port of New Orleans can be located anyplace else. They have to keep it right where it is.
Now, they might rebuild the residential sections farther away. Or they build medium density housing to replace the low density housing, and make a taller, but shorter levee.
I don't think the Port of New Orleans can be located anyplace else. They have to keep it right where it is.
0 likes
- Mobile Expat
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:59 am
- Location: Knoxville, TN
- Contact:
20,000 Leagues Under the Gulf?
NOLA is below sea-level and surrounded by water. Levee system or no, a direct hit from a Cat 4 storm is bad, bad news.
They don't call New Orleans the Cajun Atlantis for nothing.
They don't call New Orleans the Cajun Atlantis for nothing.
0 likes
- johngaltfla
- Category 5

- Posts: 2072
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Sarasota County, FL
- Contact:
kevin wrote:Only about 48 hours too early if you believe the reports that have come out. I'm also skeptical because I put a lot more faith in engineering than most people do, and I know reports have to cover themselves by puting the worst out there instead of the probable.
The city would be rebuilt. People would want that I figure. Also its a port, and a pretty important one I believe. Seeing it is on the end of the Mississippi River.
Engineering:
Next question please.
0 likes
-
Blown
Re: Will they rebuild New Orleans if it hits as a Cat 5?
logybogy wrote:If it comes in as a Cat 4/5 and the entire city is destroyed and in 20 feet of toxic sludge containing sewage and chemicals for 6 months, would they even rebuild the city?
It would probably make more sense to rebuild "New New Orleans" on higher ground or at least invest in 50 feet levees. Aren't the levees around St. Louis 50ft tall? Why are they so low around New Orleans? They've known about the doomsday scenario for decades.

0 likes
-
kevin
Thanks for being condescending.
Especially since I implied that New Orleans would be screwed. All I think is that they won't be completely screwed as in every building down. I refer you to the Tsunami where water came in at great force but did not sweep all the high rises into the ocean.
Especially since I implied that New Orleans would be screwed. All I think is that they won't be completely screwed as in every building down. I refer you to the Tsunami where water came in at great force but did not sweep all the high rises into the ocean.
Last edited by kevin on Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Steve Cosby
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 525
- Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 6:49 pm
- Location: Northwest Arkansas
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: chaser1, Extratropical94, Google Adsense [Bot], JoshwaDone and 194 guests


