Dr. Neal Frank Just Said...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
I think some people expected NO to be wiped out. It wasn't or anywhere near it. So it would be considered "saved". I've never expected that myself.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Tue Aug 30, 2005 1:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
One problem-HOW do you evacuate the city? All roads are impassible, the airports are unusable and there's no access to them anyway. The transportation infrastructure is GONE. At least in SFO in 1906 the people could walk out of town and the fire spared the Ferry Building so they were able to evacuate across the Bay-this is different, NOLA is cut off from the outside World.
Steve
Steve
0 likes
- Mobile Expat
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 1:59 am
- Location: Knoxville, TN
- Contact:
Thunder44 wrote:I think some people expected NO to be wiped out. It wasn't or anywhere near it.
What exactly is your definition of "wiped out?" Eighty percent of the city is underwater. Forty thousand homes are underwater in ONE parish. A death toll that city officials are said to believe is in the thousands. The power won't be back on until October, at the earliest, there is no drinking water and the storm water is still rising in the city.
What else does New Orleans have to happen to it to meet the rest of the country's standards for utter devastation?
0 likes
-
Viper452
temujin wrote:I think the reporters expected to walk out and see entire buildings leveled. Since they were in the French Quarter on high ground in low, stout buildings, it didn't look that bad. They were in a rush to get something on air, and just reported what they saw at the time.
This tends to happen, I notice, with most storms. Because the only areas reporters can see at first are the least damaged areas, they say there is less damage than expected. Then more information becomes available, and the nightmares are revealed.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Jonny and 120 guests


