Andrew vs. Katrina

Discuss the recovery and aftermath of landfalling hurricanes. Please be sensitive to those that have been directly impacted. Political threads will be deleted without notice. This is the place to come together not divide.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
logybogy

Andrew vs. Katrina

#1 Postby logybogy » Sun Sep 11, 2005 1:16 am

Obviously, the death toll in Katrina was worse and if that's all you base hurricanes on then Katrina wins hands down.

But it seems to me that Katrina was mainly a storm surge storm which was made worse by geographical flukes. A city under sea level. Gulf Coast topography that had shallow waters and allowed a massive 30foot storm surge that wouldn't have been possible on the Atlantic Coast. If you look at simply wind damage, most Katrina wind damage inland was mostly Cat 1/2 damage with some sporadic Cat 3 damage.

Andrew, on the other hand, was like a small F3 tornado. It completely leveled Homestead Florida for miles and Homestead is well inland. The wind damage I've seen from Katrina doesn't approach Andrew at all. And storm surge with Andrew was a relative non-issue aside from very small sections near the old Burger King Building.
0 likes   

User avatar
HollynLA
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 836
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:36 pm
Location: South Louisiana

#2 Postby HollynLA » Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:05 am

Don't start. Now is not the time.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#3 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Sep 11, 2005 7:49 am

most of Katrinas damage inland, was of cat 1/2, because it was a cat 1/2 inland
0 likes   

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

#4 Postby PTPatrick » Sun Sep 11, 2005 10:53 am

I dont understand the need to have pissing contests between hurricanes. they are all so different, with such similar results...death and broke lives. Look man, yes Andrew had higher winds in its eyewall...but it was small storm. Most folks I know in northen Miami and Ft. Lauderdale had cat 1 damage. His legacy is that of leveling a city called Homestead with very strong winds. And the horrible aftermath that ensued with an unprepared Red Cross and insurance industry.

Katrina was a huge storm with cat 4 winds in a very small area around the eye wall, that had cat 1 and 2 winds up to 105 miles east of the center. It carried a cat 5 storm surge that leveled not just a town, but the entire coast of Mississippi and much of southeastern LA.

My point...the storms were both horrible in their own individual ways. Ultimately, the pissing contest will likely be won by Katrina if you look strictly at dollars, but what does that matter. There is no need for who was worst contest...it is comparing apples and oranges. There are no similarities, except in the final result...lots of death and destruction.
0 likes   

CajunMama
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 10791
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:57 pm
Location: 30.22N, 92.05W Lafayette, LA

#5 Postby CajunMama » Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:59 am

Both storms had catastrophic damage unlike we have never seen before. No need to start something here...i'm locking this thread before a shouting match is started.
0 likes   


Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 264 guests