The best way to remember that is that they're a total of 3 ps, as in C3PO!

Moderator: S2k Moderators
apocalypt-flyer wrote:And the poster who said that Stan might be a nasty Cat.4 for the Carolinas might nail it as well because I don't really like the look of future Invest 97 (which could become Stan) ......
BensonTCwatcher wrote:I think we are looking at the models and making predictions again. I am reminded by the words in this mornings discussion, which is that they are just putting the track on or near the models becuase that is the best guidance for NOW. The longer term track looks different than the tropical models because the synoptic scale pattern will possibly make the track more west than the current model tracks.
Not saying that is a certainty, but it sure looks likely right now. In other words, a lot of attention needs to be paid over the next couple weeks.
SkeetoBite wrote:krysof wrote:http://www.weatherunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200517_model.html
More accurate models, Gfdl included and Ukmet.
More accurate.... in the model performance for those models in their graphic, right?
Don't want folks thinking my maps are not accurate.
krysof wrote:SkeetoBite wrote:krysof wrote:http://www.weatherunderground.com/tropical/tracking/at200517_model.html
More accurate models, Gfdl included and Ukmet.
More accurate.... in the model performance for those models in their graphic, right?
Don't want folks thinking my maps are not accurate.
No, but in your model graphics, the best models are only the Gfdl, and to an extent the Ukmet (middle accurate model) I also included the Nogaps and gfs which are two other good models you didn't have.
skysummit wrote:Skeetobite...any way you can get the rest of the "better" models on your maps? I notice out of the sites that provide models, there is not one that has all of them....except for Midatlanticwx.com which I subscribe to, but it's not usually updated right away.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests