Neil Frank's take

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Neil Frank's take

#1 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:35 pm

Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

Re: Neil Frank's take

#2 Postby Stratosphere747 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:38 pm

dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


dwg...

This is a Corpus to Galveston storm...

Call me what you will...
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Neil Frank's take

#3 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:40 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


dwg...

This is a Corpus to Galveston storm...

Call me what you will...


dont shoot the messanger...just quoting him. He said we will have to wait and see.
0 likes   

Charles-KD5ZSM
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

Re: Neil Frank's take

#4 Postby Charles-KD5ZSM » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:40 pm

dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


it must be nice living in never-never land. i'll give you a visit when i need a break from reality.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: Neil Frank's take

#5 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:42 pm

Charles-KD5ZSM wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


it must be nice living in never-never land. i'll give you a visit when i need a break from reality.

What?

Almost every person would have to agree with that reasoning above, if you think it will be further east read the 11 pm discussion to find out why it won't.

Obviously you have no real idea on how the ridge works or how it is expected to erode.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Neil Frank's take

#6 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:45 pm

dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


Of course he said Northern Mexico to TX/LA border...that's the cone of error.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#7 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:45 pm

I'm testy, so I will have to bite my tongue. Look at the models, read the discussions, read the experts (Ortt, Sutherland, others). If you think a Galveston Cat 4 is a foregone conclusion. Your the smartes guy on the planet.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: Neil Frank's take

#8 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:46 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


Of course he said Northern Mexico to TX/LA border...that's the cone of error.

LOL, thats very true. Like I said, the very reasonable scenario. Someone obviously disagrees for some apparent unfounded reason.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: Neil Frank's take

#9 Postby southerngale » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:46 pm

Charles-KD5ZSM wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


it must be nice living in never-never land. i'll give you a visit when i need a break from reality.


What in the world are you talking about?
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

Re: Neil Frank's take

#10 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:47 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


Of course he said Northern Mexico to TX/LA border...that's the cone of error.


He mentioned them because of NHC strike probabilities that had Brownsville at 11 and others up to 13. He said they are all but equal. He said and I'm quoting "If you went to the track and a horse was 10 to 1 to win, a horse that is 9 to 1 is just the same."
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

Re: Neil Frank's take

#11 Postby jkt21787 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:47 pm

southerngale wrote:
Charles-KD5ZSM wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


it must be nice living in never-never land. i'll give you a visit when i need a break from reality.


What in the world are you talking about?

Its obvious he is the one in never-never land.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8250
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#12 Postby jasons2k » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:47 pm

I just watched him and the horse analogy was used with the current probability numbers (which, by the way, he started while at the NHC). They were 11/11 for NOLA and Brownsville, and 13/13 at Corpus and Galveston.

He said it was like betting at the horse track, not much difference between a 9:1 and a 10:1 horse.

He is a bit "old school" in that anything beyond 3 days is 'trashed'.

Personally, I didn't much care for his presentation tonight. There was no urgency. A lot of people look to him because he is so well-respected (I think he was the best NHC director) but he blew it IMO.
0 likes   

Mac

#13 Postby Mac » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:49 pm

I'm sorry, but I really think Rita is going to head more north than NHC is thinking at this point--or Ortt and others, for that matter. And I'll admit I'm no pro met. But she is going to be an all out monster. She wants to turn poleward, so she'll exploit any opportunity she can to do that. She'll push with all her might against that high pressure system. And while no hurricane is a match for a high pressure system, she'll expose every single weakness in that ridge--stair-stepping her way north, then northwest, then north. Before it's all said and done, I'm still believing she is going to be closer to Galveston at landfall than Corpus.
0 likes   

dwg71
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2349
Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:34 pm

#14 Postby dwg71 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:53 pm

jschlitz wrote:I just watched him and the horse analogy was used with the current probability numbers (which, by the way, he started while at the NHC). They were 11/11 for NOLA and Brownsville, and 13/13 at Corpus and Galveston.

He said it was like betting at the horse track, not much difference between a 9:1 and a 10:1 horse.

He is a bit "old school" in that anything beyond 3 days is 'trashed'.

Personally, I didn't much care for his presentation tonight. There was no urgency. A lot of people look to him because he is so well-respected (I think he was the best NHC director) but he blew it IMO.


I actually liked hearing a calm, informed voice of reason.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

#15 Postby fci » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:54 pm

jschlitz wrote:I just watched him and the horse analogy was used with the current probability numbers (which, by the way, he started while at the NHC). They were 11/11 for NOLA and Brownsville, and 13/13 at Corpus and Galveston.

He said it was like betting at the horse track, not much difference between a 9:1 and a 10:1 horse.

He is a bit "old school" in that anything beyond 3 days is 'trashed'.

Personally, I didn't much care for his presentation tonight. There was no urgency. A lot of people look to him because he is so well-respected (I think he was the best NHC director) but he blew it IMO.


I don't live there and obviously did not see Neil Frank on Houston TV but I clearly remember him as NHC Director and thought he was awesome at the time.

Sounds to me like he is hedging for now since many take his word as gospel and the final destination is just not clear enough yet for him to pinpoint.

I think that is very logical so as not to let anybody let their guard down at this point. It is a very dangerous situation and ALL residents in the possible landfall area must be very diligent.
0 likes   

Furious George
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 126
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:03 pm

Re: Neil Frank's take

#16 Postby Furious George » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:56 pm

dwg71 wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


Of course he said Northern Mexico to TX/LA border...that's the cone of error.


He mentioned them because of NHC strike probabilities that had Brownsville at 11 and others up to 13. He said they are all but equal. He said and I'm quoting "If you went to the track and a horse was 10 to 1 to win, a horse that is 9 to 1 is just the same."


That actually makes some pretty good sense to me. What doesn't make sense are the reporters on CNN and Foxnews who suggest this has to hit Houston/Galveston because they are due. You've got to predict what the High Pressure will do before predicting what path Rita will take.
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#17 Postby Stratosphere747 » Tue Sep 20, 2005 10:58 pm

jschlitz wrote:I just watched him and the horse analogy was used with the current probability numbers (which, by the way, he started while at the NHC). They were 11/11 for NOLA and Brownsville, and 13/13 at Corpus and Galveston.

He said it was like betting at the horse track, not much difference between a 9:1 and a 10:1 horse.

He is a bit "old school" in that anything beyond 3 days is 'trashed'.

Personally, I didn't much care for his presentation tonight. There was no urgency. A lot of people look to him because he is so well-respected (I think he was the best NHC director) but he blew it IMO.


J...

I agree...I'm tired of this 30% chance outside of the cone BS...

Scott
0 likes   

User avatar
Roxy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 657
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 7:58 am
Location: Houston (Clear Lake)

#18 Postby Roxy » Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:01 pm

well I was glad Dr. Neil said what he did, we really don't know anything right now and the panic is getting frustrating.

I guess I am just tired, I will go to bed now and get up for the 5am. It'll be decision time then.

Those of you who are staying up, get this thing out of here...we don't need it.

:(
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

Re: Neil Frank's take

#19 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:03 pm

dwg71 wrote:
Air Force Met wrote:
dwg71 wrote:Good idea for next 48 hours...after that its a horse race from there on out. He said that anywhere from Northern Mexico to TX/LA border.

It all depends on high. If it stays put then it move south. If it moves off to the west then it could be pulled north.


Of course he said Northern Mexico to TX/LA border...that's the cone of error.


He mentioned them because of NHC strike probabilities that had Brownsville at 11 and others up to 13. He said they are all but equal. He said and I'm quoting "If you went to the track and a horse was 10 to 1 to win, a horse that is 9 to 1 is just the same."


The strike probs are computer generated...and only go out 72 hours. That menas there is an equal chance for those locations if the storm speeds up and hits within 72 hours. That means they are pretty worthless now. Look at the probs when it's 60 hours out...much more accurate.
0 likes   

Eye10TX
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 83
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:40 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Doctor Neil tonight ....

#20 Postby Eye10TX » Tue Sep 20, 2005 11:05 pm

I have to say I was a bit surprised at how low-key Dr. Frank was tonight, too. I missed the first part of his segment, but switched over to see if he was fielding phone-in questions, so I could post the number here, but he wasn't even doing that.

Guess I'll bring my own apprehension down just a notch, for now!
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: riapal and 387 guests