Rita has stalled based on wator vapor loop..

stormspotter · #1 Postby **stormspotter** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:03 pm

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/DATA/RT/float-wv-loop.html

:Chit:

Josephine96 · #2 Postby **Josephine96** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:04 pm

Please tell me this darn thing didn't stop movin.. This thing better not be changing directions and making a bee line for LA.

Whoever gets this is gonna be pummeled.. :cry:

skufful · #3 Postby **skufful** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:08 pm

Looks to be moving to me.

huricanwatcher · #4 Postby **huricanwatcher** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:13 pm

If anything that STALL you were talking about... it a slower west movement.. a slow sidestep...rather than the more NW it was doing.....

#5 Postby **Pebbles** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:14 pm

No it HAS NOT STALLED.. but it has taken a little wobble west. On that loop you will see a little box at the top of the loop, TROP FCST PTS, click it to make a check mark in that box. It will bring up the forcast points and you can clearly see the eye is indeed moving

Indystorm · #6 Postby **Indystorm** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 9:19 pm

Seems to be stairstepping as hurricanes usually do.....but my thinking is that the track seems to be more in line with Galveston...Freeport than east of there according to current general motion relative to the storm forecast plots.

Viper252 · #7 Postby **Viper252** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:44 pm

I would rather see it hit NOLA. It would save lives and only hit a deserted area.

NFLnut · #8 Postby **NFLnut** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:51 pm

Reet definitely has NOT stalled, and appears to be taking a westerly wobble, but I anticipate this is part of the ERC conclusion and the NW component should resume. She should start riding up the weakness in the ridge to her north.

#9 Postby **Mattie** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:52 pm

I hate to hear the comments that "I'd rather see it hit NO, . . . for whatever reason . . .

A point to remember, there is not much left in south Louisiana to protect areas that are north, east and west of New Orleans and those of us that have families that could be affected, would rather it hit areas that have already been evacuated.

Just MHO. . . .

#10 Postby **bevgo** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:52 pm

Viper252 wrote:I would rather see it hit NOLA. It would save lives and only hit a deserted area.

NOLA is not deserted! My son is on the Westbank. I don't think he can afford to get out again and I am not sure I will be able to get him money at this point.

Dmetal81 · #11 Postby **Dmetal81** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:54 pm

Viper252 wrote:I would rather see it hit NOLA. It would save lives and only hit a deserted area.

Thats a loaded comment.. lets use our heads a little bit. *shakes head* I can't believe someone would say that.... *shakes head again*

Sean in New Orleans · #12 Postby **Sean in New Orleans** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 10:55 pm

Viper252 wrote:I would rather see it hit NOLA. It would save lives and only hit a deserted area.

Good God, How old are you? Nine? Does your mommie know you are still up on the internet? One can only guess at your age based upon your reasoning... :roll:

NCHurricane · #13 Postby **NCHurricane** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:00 pm

Viper252 wrote:I would rather see it degenerate into a tropical wave. It would save lives and help a parched area receive very benefical rainfall.

There Viper, I fixed it for you. Saved you from a lynching.

Chuck
http://www.nchurricane.com

Dmetal81 · #14 Postby **Dmetal81** » Thu Sep 22, 2005 11:04 pm

NCHurricane wrote:
Viper252 wrote:I would rather see it degenerate into a tropical wave. It would save lives and help a parched area receive very benefical rainfall.

There Viper, I fixed it for you. Saved you from a lynching.

Chuck
http://www.nchurricane.com

That works! :lol:

Rita has stalled based on wator vapor loop..

Rita has stalled based on wator vapor loop..

Who is online