Rita Recon Reports

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Scorpion

#1681 Postby Scorpion » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:44 pm

Let me guess Avila?
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2016
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#1682 Postby CronkPSU » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:45 pm

Scorpion wrote:Let me guess Avila?


yep
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

#1683 Postby Windy » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:54 pm

Should be a new VORTEX soon... looks like the NOAA plane just popped into the eye again. 91 kts max in SW quad.
Last edited by Windy on Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3664
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

#1684 Postby drezee » Fri Sep 23, 2005 3:54 pm

NHC used the Recon flights to increase the gusts from 150 to 155mph...They are looking a the data
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

#1685 Postby Windy » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:02 pm

931mb.

575
UZNT13 KWBC 232046
XXAA 73217 99282 70926 08282 99931 280// 09507 00/// ///// /////
92061 27611 10005 85810 23402 33005 70496 180// 03502 88999 77999
31313 09608 82031
61616 NOAA3 2318A RITA OB 19
62626 SPL 2816N09263W 2034 WL150 10505 085 DLM WND 04003 931696 M
BL WND 07003=
XXBB 73218 99282 70926 08282 00931 280// 11930 28012 22864 24408
33849 23402 44712 176// 55696 18236
21212 00931 09507 11911 10506 22904 04001 33873 36008 44862 36002
55696 07004
31313 09608 82031
61616 NOAA3 2318A RITA OB 19
62626 SPL 2816N09263W 2034 WL150 10505 085 DLM WND 04003 931696 M
BL WND 07003=
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1686 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:03 pm

131
URNT40 KWBC 232040
NOAA3 2318A RITA
203030 2806 09237 10027 -1673 261011 +177 +155 268014 013 003
203100 2808 09237 10028 -1680 255005 +175 +153 258006 017 001
203130 2810 09238 10033 -1683 066006 +180 +145 078011 999 999
203200 2812 09237 10022 -1688 075017 +167 +159 077018 999 999
203230 2813 09236 10015 -1694 082017 +165 +162 079017 012 004
203300 2812 09233 10019 -1699 123014 +169 +153 108015 012 004
203330 2812 09231 10020 -1692 156018 +179 +144 161023 999 999
203400 2813 09229 10024 -1686 166031 +171 +155 163032 015 003
203430 2815 09228 10023 -1667 154040 +168 +162 156045 028 003
203500 2816 09226 10021 -1639 150054 +182 +149 148060 049 004
203530 2818 09224 10023 -1581 145076 +177 +151 145084 080 005
203600 2819 09222 10033 -1493 146094 +164 +160 147099 087 011
203630 2821 09221 10023 -1385 148115 +150 +150 148117 088 025
203700 2822 09219 10042 -1256 141117 +139 +139 141118 085 028
203730 2823 09218 9997 -1155 142119 +139 +139 143121 064 056
203800 2825 09216 9984 -1059 139117 +131 +131 139118 077 042
203830 2826 09215 9974 -0971 138110 +133 +133 137115 076 024
203900 2827 09213 9988 -0901 138107 +134 +130 137108 076 015
203930 2829 09212 10031 -0834 140106 +137 +120 139107 075 006
204000 2830 09210 10038 -0782 141101 +144 +119 140102 073 003

121kts in NW Quad
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1687 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:05 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:have you not noticed that the surface winds are of category 2 intensity?


Yeah, but some of the estimates have been lousy of late. Either seems too high or too low. I wouldn't trust it too much.
0 likes   

weatherFrEaK
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 146
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 12:57 pm
Location: Earth

#1688 Postby weatherFrEaK » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:07 pm

URNT12 KNHC 232100Z
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 23/2031Z
B. 28 DEG 09 MIN N
92 DEG 37 MIN W
C. 700 MB 2493 MA
D. NA
E. NA
F. 289 DEG 91 KT
G. 197 DEG 15 NM
H. 931 MB
I. 14 C/ 3055 M
J. 20 C/ 3056 M
K. 15 C/ NA
L. OPEN SOUTH
M. C25
N. 12345/7
O. 1/1 NM
P. NOAA3 2318A RITA OB 20
MAX FL WIND 124 KT NE QUAD 2037Z
EYE OPEN E THRU W
0 likes   

User avatar
Windy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1628
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 10:13 pm

#1689 Postby Windy » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:07 pm

duplicate
Last edited by Windy on Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1690 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:08 pm

the SFMR was recalibrated just befor eyesterdays flight, and it was tested and yielded accurate results

this is not a 110KT hurricane
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1691 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:08 pm

575
UZNT13 KWBC 232046
XXAA 73217 99282 70926 08282 99931 280// 09507 00/// ///// /////
92061 27611 10005 85810 23402 33005 70496 180// 03502 88999 77999
31313 09608 82031
61616 NOAA3 2318A RITA OB 19
62626 SPL 2816N09263W 2034 WL150 10505 085 DLM WND 04003 931696 M
BL WND 07003=
XXBB 73218 99282 70926 08282 00931 280// 11930 28012 22864 24408
33849 23402 44712 176// 55696 18236
21212 00931 09507 11911 10506 22904 04001 33873 36008 44862 36002
55696 07004
31313 09608 82031
61616 NOAA3 2318A RITA OB 19
62626 SPL 2816N09263W 2034 WL150 10505 085 DLM WND 04003 931696 M
BL WND 07003=
0 likes   

Droop12
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Indianapolis

#1692 Postby Droop12 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:10 pm

So Derek, are you saying the recon reports are useless at this point?
0 likes   

bigmoney755

#1693 Postby bigmoney755 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:10 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the SFMR was recalibrated just befor eyesterdays flight, and it was tested and yielded accurate results

this is not a 110KT hurricane

you want them to say this is a cat 2 hurricane with a pressure of 931mb?!?!?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1694 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:12 pm

no, they are quite useful to document the wind readings

some here are focuing strictly on the 700mb winds, while totally ignoring the surface winds.
0 likes   

djtil
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 699
Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2005 10:09 am

#1695 Postby djtil » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:12 pm

cats arent based on pressure.


only 50% eyewall left......chance of rapid weakening is there.
0 likes   

tallywx
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 792
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 10:19 am
Location: Raleigh/Durham, NC

#1696 Postby tallywx » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:13 pm

Derek, what's been going on with this sea change of hurricanes with pressures that seem to suggest much higher surface winds than they actually have?

I understand that it's not about the pressure but the tightness of the windfield, but still, we're seeing moderately-sized storms and windfields with significant discrepancy between wind and pressure. This is something that was hardly ever observed just a few years ago.

Could it be that our technology has improved such that we're discovering less correlation than previously assumed and attributed to many storms past?

This could mean that many storms considered to be a particular strength, even as recent as 5-10 years ago, may in fact have been much weaker.
Last edited by tallywx on Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#1697 Postby Thunder44 » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:16 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:the SFMR was recalibrated just befor eyesterdays flight, and it was tested and yielded accurate results

this is not a 110KT hurricane


So why doesn't TPC seem to be paying much attention to it? There's no mention of it n the lastest discussion.
Last edited by Thunder44 on Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
feederband
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Lakeland Fl

#1698 Postby feederband » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:16 pm

djtil wrote:cats arent based on pressure.


only 50% eyewall left......chance of rapid weakening is there.


Where you getting that from?
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#1699 Postby Derek Ortt » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:16 pm

primarily some of the storms of the 50's and 60's, some of which, like Camielle, were based strictly upon 12 hour old recon reports.

The reanalsyis is fixing this

one thing to notice, Katrina and Rita may been more typical of a WPAC typhoon. Maybe we should be using the WPAC pressure to wind relation and the results there would be more in line with what we are seeing here
0 likes   

LanceW
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 89
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:09 pm
Location: Poinciana FL

#1700 Postby LanceW » Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:18 pm

Vortex above:
EYE OPEN E THRU W

feederband wrote:
djtil wrote:cats arent based on pressure.


only 50% eyewall left......chance of rapid weakening is there.


Where you getting that from?
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ncforecaster89 and 78 guests