Katrina Damage Totals

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

Katrina Damage Totals

#1 Postby quandary » Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:34 am

Does anyone have a total damage count on Katrina (and also Rita)?
0 likes   

fasterdisaster
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1868
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:41 pm
Location: Miami, Florida

#2 Postby fasterdisaster » Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:36 am

Katrina: $100-200+ billion
Rita: $14-20 billion

This is full damage, not just insurance.
0 likes   

quandary
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 4:04 pm

#3 Postby quandary » Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:51 am

Also, can anyone determine if Katrina caused more damage that all other US storms in history or how many combined she exceeded. It seems like the figure of 250-300 billion dollars would alone beat out Andrew and 2004 combined together with all the dozens of retired storms over the years. If this is the case, Katrina must truly be an immortal cyclone.
0 likes   

Charles-KD5ZSM
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 62
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 5:09 pm
Location: Ocean Springs, MS

#4 Postby Charles-KD5ZSM » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:22 am

quandary wrote:Also, can anyone determine if Katrina caused more damage that all other US storms in history or how many combined she exceeded. It seems like the figure of 250-300 billion dollars would alone beat out Andrew and 2004 combined together with all the dozens of retired storms over the years. If this is the case, Katrina must truly be an immortal cyclone.


The only thing I know is that Katrina will be more costly than Andrew. Down here in Mississippi, Katrina took out multiple cities in Hancock County and some in Harrison County. It did fairly good damage here in Jackson County, but not as bad as the others. Most of the costal cities in Hancock County virtually don't exsist any more. You are lucky if you live in one of those cities and still have a home to return to. I don't really know how bad it is in Louisiana yet. I can only tell by looking at the pictures on tv. :cry:
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#5 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:26 am

Lets just say: Move over Andrew. Make a place for Katrina.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
MyGulfParadise
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2005 2:17 pm
Location: Gulf Shores, Alabama

#6 Postby MyGulfParadise » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:57 am

Not to play down Andrew's damage but one of the big reasons its damage total was so high was because it hit an Air Force base where the commander didn't get the airplanes out. It doesn't take to many 30 million dollar airplanes being destroyed to run up the damage total.
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#7 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2005 7:59 am

MyGulfParadise wrote:Not to play down Andrew's damage but one of the big reasons its damage total was so high was because it hit an Air Force base where the commander didn't get the airplanes out. It doesn't take to many 30 million dollar airplanes being destroyed to run up the damage total.



Aaah that is a very good point. I dont really remember how much damage was cost as a result of Homestead Airforce Base being destroyed by hurricane Andrew but Im sure it was worse for them up there.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

recmod
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 8:57 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#8 Postby recmod » Mon Oct 03, 2005 8:30 am

A total of TWO fighter planes were left behind at Homestead Airforce Base. Both were already in poor shape and could not be flown out before Andrew struck..

--Lou
0 likes   

Droop12
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 377
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 9:57 pm
Location: Indianapolis

#9 Postby Droop12 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 11:12 am

Yea I doubt 2 fighter planes accounted for much of Andrews total. Did you see Homestead, Perrine, Florida City?
0 likes   

User avatar
arkess7
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2071
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Edgewater, FL

#10 Postby arkess7 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 12:17 pm

Droop12 wrote:Yea I doubt 2 fighter planes accounted for much of Andrews total. Did you see Homestead, Perrine, Florida City?


Yea i remeber my uncle who is a masonary......was down there for YEARS after andrew hit.....rebuilding...and rebuilding and rebuilding....
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#11 Postby f5 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:42 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:Lets just say: Move over Andrew. Make a place for Katrina.

<RICKY>


If this were a race Andrew would be in the negative beacuse Katrina pass him about 8 time 25billion x8=200 billion maybe 300 hundred billion so possably 10 times instead of 8
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2779
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

#12 Postby Frank P » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:42 pm

Andrew destroyed about 28,000 homes.... it took 10 years to rebuild...

Katrina destroyed about 10 times that much, about 275,000 last count... now how many years is that going to take to rebuild?
0 likes   

User avatar
LAwxrgal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1763
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 1:05 pm
Location: Reserve, LA (30 mi west of NOLA)

#13 Postby LAwxrgal » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:44 pm

Not to mention, even if New Orleans hadn't flooded Katrina's damage, IMO, would still be in the $50+ billion range, due to all the damage in extreme SELA outside of NOLA and Mississippi.
0 likes   
Andrew 92/Isidore & Lili 02/Bill 03/Katrina & Rita 05/Gustav & Ike 08/Isaac 12 (flooded my house)/Harvey 17/Barry 19/Cristobal 20/Claudette 21/Ida 21 (In the Eye)/Francine 24
Wake me up when November ends

Derek Ortt

#14 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:46 pm

also,

the parts of New Orleans that did not flood, such as the central Business District where the super dome is located, sustained severe wind damage, especially to the high rise structures. The wind damage alone in New Orleans was severe and gave a taste as to what will happen when Miami receives a direct hit of a major, or NYC
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#15 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:08 pm

Frank P wrote:Andrew destroyed about 28,000 homes.... it took 10 years to rebuild...

Katrina destroyed about 10 times that much, about 275,000 last count... now how many years is that going to take to rebuild?


The quastion is is is worth spending the hundreds of billions to rebuild. If Katrina's where rare then I would say yes!!! But Rita showed us that her kind is not. So is it worth rebuild to have it destroyed again?
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#16 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:12 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:
Frank P wrote:Andrew destroyed about 28,000 homes.... it took 10 years to rebuild...

Katrina destroyed about 10 times that much, about 275,000 last count... now how many years is that going to take to rebuild?


The quastion is is is worth spending the hundreds of billions to rebuild. If Katrina's where rare then I would say yes!!! But Rita showed us that her kind is not. So is it worth rebuild to have it destroyed again?


That is a big question to ask indeed.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#17 Postby brunota2003 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:17 pm

WeatherEmperor wrote:
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:
Frank P wrote:Andrew destroyed about 28,000 homes.... it took 10 years to rebuild...

Katrina destroyed about 10 times that much, about 275,000 last count... now how many years is that going to take to rebuild?


The quastion is is is worth spending the hundreds of billions to rebuild. If Katrina's where rare then I would say yes!!! But Rita showed us that her kind is not. So is it worth rebuild to have it destroyed again?


That is a big question to ask indeed.

<RICKY>
I would say in a major city BELOW sea level on the coast, no... :cry:
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:18 pm

I if I could give my answer, the answer would be a loud no to any reconstruction. One does not have to live right on the coast, or in a tidal surge plain that is below the surface of the sea.

The reconstruction should occur inland
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

#19 Postby WeatherEmperor » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:21 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:I if I could give my answer, the answer would be a loud no to any reconstruction. One does not have to live right on the coast, or in a tidal surge plain that is below the surface of the sea.

The reconstruction should occur inland


my feelings are the same. i didnt wanna say much about it because I feared it would be overly sensative to those who lost so much during Katrina.

<RICKY>
0 likes   

gpickett00
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 262
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2004 8:47 pm
Location: Satellite Beach Florida
Contact:

#20 Postby gpickett00 » Mon Oct 03, 2005 6:58 pm

you really think it took 10 years to rebuild after andrew??
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mitchell, Team Ghost, WaveBreaking and 54 guests