Florida Landfalling Storms
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
- Cookiely
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 3211
- Age: 74
- Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:31 am
- Location: Tampa, Florida
Florida Landfalling Storms
Why aren't there any storms in the following locations? Is there a geographic reason or just plain luck?
1. Between Alma and Easy
2. Gladys and Charley
3. Dora and David
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/hur5005.jpg
1. Between Alma and Easy
2. Gladys and Charley
3. Dora and David
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/hur5005.jpg
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5

- Posts: 4430
- Age: 44
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
Re: Florida Landfalling Storms
Cookiely wrote:Why aren't there any storms in the following locations? Is there a geographic reason or just plain luck?
1. Between Alma and Easy
2. Gladys and Charley
3. Dora and David
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/hur5005.jpg
Angle...
0 likes
-
flhurricaneguy
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 197
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:21 am
-
NastyCat4
- linkerweather
- Professional-Met

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 5:59 am
- Location: tampa bay area
Re: Florida Landfalling Storms
overlay average tracks. that and points where the coast juts out and sinks in. it's angles + luck, really.Cookiely wrote:Why aren't there any storms in the following locations? Is there a geographic reason or just plain luck?
1. Between Alma and Easy
2. Gladys and Charley
3. Dora and David
http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/gifs/hur5005.jpg
0 likes
- weatherwindow
- Category 4

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
- Location: key west/ft lauderdale
- weatherwindow
- Category 4

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 9:48 am
- Location: key west/ft lauderdale
-
inotherwords
- Category 2

- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 9:04 pm
- Location: Nokomis, FL
When TS Gabrielle came ashore in 2001 near Venice on Sept. 14 there were recordings in buoys offshore that showed sustained winds just over hurricane strength. This was told to me personally by one of the NOAA guys whom I'd interviewed for an article in 2002. It was never reclassified as a hurricane at that point of its evolution, but he told me it probably should have been.
Whether this is technically correct is moot at this point, my only point in bringing it up is to show that this part of FL is not immune from a landfalling hurricane.
Whether this is technically correct is moot at this point, my only point in bringing it up is to show that this part of FL is not immune from a landfalling hurricane.
0 likes
-
Brent
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 38264
- Age: 37
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
inotherwords wrote:When TS Gabrielle came ashore in 2001 near Venice on Sept. 14 there were recordings in buoys offshore that showed sustained winds just over hurricane strength. This was told to me personally by one of the NOAA guys whom I'd interviewed for an article in 2002. It was never reclassified as a hurricane at that point of its evolution, but he told me it probably should have been.
Whether this is technically correct is moot at this point, my only point in bringing it up is to show that this part of FL is not immune from a landfalling hurricane.
I've always believed Gabrielle was probably a hurricane as well. That was one of the only times I didn't follow a tropical system very closely because of the 9/11 attacks.
0 likes
#neversummer
once again Ill refer to this research:
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/history/index.html
Ive condensed the totals to what affected NE Florida alone. History is taken from Castillo De San Marcos (St Augustine) until Jacksonville itself was a proper city.
Dora also had wind readings of 115mph at landfall, making it a Cat 3 storm
*sorry for the long post here:
this list alone shows that NE Florida is nowhere near immune from hurricanes like most people think.
http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/history/index.html
Ive condensed the totals to what affected NE Florida alone. History is taken from Castillo De San Marcos (St Augustine) until Jacksonville itself was a proper city.
Dora also had wind readings of 115mph at landfall, making it a Cat 3 storm
*sorry for the long post here:
1565 September
Hurricane - sank the French Fleet from Ft Caroline in present day Jacksonville
1571 September
Hurricane - St Augustine Landfall
1599 September
Hurricane - inundated St Augustine
1638 August
Hurricane
1641 September
Tropical Storm
1674 August
Hurricane
1707 September
Hurricane
1753 August
Tropical Storm
1769 September
Hurricane
1794 October
Hurricane
1797 October
Hurricane
1804 September
Hurricane
1806 September
Hurricane
1811 October
Hurricane
1812 October
Hurricane (same dates as one in 1811, 2 storms back to back years)
1813 September
Hurricane - possibly a major
1824 September
Hurricane
1825 June
TS (backdoor hit)
1825 October
Hurricane
1830 October
Tropical Storm
1831 June
Tropical Storm (backdoor hit)
1835 August
Tropical Storm
1837 August
Hurricane -possibly a major (barometers in Puerto Rico read 28.00 | 948mb )
1837 August
Tropical Storm - second storm passes offshore in same month bringing TS force winds to coastline
1837 August
Tropical Storm - backdoor hit (3rd "hit" within same month)
1837 September
Tropical Storm (a total of 6 storms affect NE Florida and Georgia that year alone)
1841 September
Tropical Storm
1842 August
Tropical Storm
1842 October
Hurricane backdoor hit
1842 October
Tropical Storm - possible recurve of earlier storm in October
1844 September
Hurricane
1846 October
MAJOR Hurricane - backdoor hit, 917mb in Havana, 901mb near Key West
1848 September
Hurricane - backdoor hit
1848 October
Tropical Storm - backdoor hit
1852 October
Tropical Storm
1853 October
Tropical Storm
1854 September
Hurricane (Major Hurricane for Georgia)
1861 August
Tropical Storm
1867 June
Tropical Storm
1871 August
HUrricane
1871 August
Tropical Storm
1871 September
Tropical Storm
1874 September
Tropical Storm
1877 October
Tropical Storm (backdoor hit)
1878 September
Hurricane - 989mb reading, weak Cat 1
1880 August
Tropical Storm
1880 October
Tropical Storm
1882 October
Tropical Storm
1885 August
Tropical Storm
1885 October
Tropical Storm (backdoor hit)
1888 October
Tropical Storm
1893 June
Tropical Storm
1893 August
Hurricane (major in Georgia)
1893 October
Tropical Storm
1894 September
Hurricane
1894 October
Tropical Storm
1896 September
MAJOR Hurricane
1897 September
Tropical Storm
1898 October
Hurricane (major in extreme NE Florida and Georgia)
this list alone shows that NE Florida is nowhere near immune from hurricanes like most people think.
0 likes
- gtalum
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 4749
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Bradenton, FL
- Contact:
Brent wrote:I've always believed Gabrielle was probably a hurricane as well. That was one of the only times I didn't follow a tropical system very closely because of the 9/11 attacks.
I think that's precisely why Gabrielle didn't get any coverage. She knocked out power all over Sarasota County for 3-5 days. There was A LOT of tree debris all over the place.
I did drive to work from my home in Sarasota to my office in Venice. The interstate was full of semis that had been blown off the road. At work we lost power shortly after I got there, and we were all standing on the lee side of the building watching the palm trees bent over in half as her center came ashore in the morning. It was a pretty cool little storm.
0 likes
-
NastyCat4
Love the "pirate ship" logs back to the 1500's. I am sure they are extremely accurate, as they had wonderful dropsondes, and radar in those days....lolol
Obviously, we have no empirical data before the 1900's that has even the slightest semblance of reality. Thus, we can assume that it is a combination of climatology and luck. I seriously doubt the veracity of "heresay" reports from the 1500's-1850's.
Obviously, we have no empirical data before the 1900's that has even the slightest semblance of reality. Thus, we can assume that it is a combination of climatology and luck. I seriously doubt the veracity of "heresay" reports from the 1500's-1850's.
0 likes
-
RonStallcup
- Tropical Low

- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 9:22 pm
- Location: Pensacola News Journal
NastyCat4 wrote:Love the "pirate ship" logs back to the 1500's. I am sure they are extremely accurate, as they had wonderful dropsondes, and radar in those days....lolol![]()
Obviously, we have no empirical data before the 1900's that has even the slightest semblance of reality. Thus, we can assume that it is a combination of climatology and luck. I seriously doubt the veracity of "heresay" reports from the 1500's-1850's.
Most of those reports were from the Commander of Castillo de San Marcos or the Spanish Governor of Florida. When water is up 8-10 feet, trees fall down, high winds, more than likely its a TS or better.
Why dont you actually read the research before blasting it. It was done by two NOAA employees.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: kevin, Team Ghost, Teban54 and 103 guests



