Hurricane Wilma - Cat. 5

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
caneman

#2221 Postby caneman » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:05 pm

But itthe dry air means nothing as far as strengthning........

THIS WILL LIKELY NOT PREVENT THE
INTENSIFICATION FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 24 HR...[/url]
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#2222 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:05 pm

jkt21787 wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Discussion is disturbing for FL as it states Major Cane possible..

It would have to miss the Yucatan or just barely graze it for a few hours or less for this to have any real chance of verifying, and this is looking more and more unlikely.


are you looking at the same radar loops I am?

http://www.southwx.net/radar/cancun_radar_animated.html

sure looks like it will barely brush the yucatan to me
0 likes   

Foladar0

#2223 Postby Foladar0 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:06 pm

cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.

What would this do to the 00z models?
0 likes   

nequad
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 303
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 3:36 pm

#2224 Postby nequad » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:06 pm

Well...data from the NOAA G IV is incorporated into the NCEP models.

This should be the definitive run for the GFS. We'll see.




NCEP Operational Status Message
Fri Oct 21 02:54:16 2005 GMT

NOUS42 KWNO 210251
ADMNFD
SPECIAL NCEP DISCUSSION
CENTRAL OPERATIONS/NCEP/NWS/WASHINGTON DC
0250 UTC FRI OCT 21 2005

21250Z...THE 00Z GFS STARTED ON TIME. NGM MODEL DONE.
NAM MODEL WAS OUT TO T+72HRS.

NCEP RECEIVED 28 DROPSONDE REPORTS FROM THE NOAA G-IV FLYING
RECON FOR HURRICANE WILMA.

00Z RAOB RECAP..

JAN/72235 - 10142..EQUIP PBLM
CDB/70316 - UNAVB...UNFAVORABLE WX

NEWBY/SDM/NCO/NCEP
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7185
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

#2225 Postby jlauderdal » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:06 pm

cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.



absolutely, big implications possibly on intensity for florida.
0 likes   

jkt21787
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2061
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:27 pm
Location: Memphis, TN

#2226 Postby jkt21787 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:06 pm

caneman wrote:But itthe dry air means nothing as far as strengthning........

THIS WILL LIKELY NOT PREVENT THE
INTENSIFICATION FORECAST DURING THE NEXT 24 HR...[/url]

Its shear, not dry air (at least in NHC's/Dr. Beven's belief). Still that statement is probably valid. AT THE LEAST, there would not be any weakening up to landfall.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#2227 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:07 pm

cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Damn Midnight again..
0 likes   

caneman

#2228 Postby caneman » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:07 pm

cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#2229 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:08 pm

It looks better it has done for the last 24 hours. The eye is back out in a donut. I think its strengthing....In really if theres shear in its not getting to the center then it still strengthing.
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#2230 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:09 pm

caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?


I think he is talking about the Intensity
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145653
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#2231 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:10 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?


I think he is talking about the Intensity


caneman about intensity.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Foladar0

#2232 Postby Foladar0 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:10 pm

caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?

North hopefully, or further south that it doesn't hit the keys.
No offense for anyone north or south, I just don't want it anywhere near me.
0 likes   

caneman

#2233 Postby caneman » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:11 pm

cycloneye wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?


I think he is talking about the Intensity


caneman about intensity.


For better or worse at Florida landfall?
0 likes   

User avatar
DESTRUCTION5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4423
Age: 43
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
Location: Stuart, FL

#2234 Postby DESTRUCTION5 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:12 pm

caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?


I think he is talking about the Intensity


caneman about intensity.


For better or worse at Florida landfall?


No Question ...Thinking WOrse
0 likes   

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#2235 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:12 pm

caneman-i feel your pain...sometimes these guys can be so non committal and like to tease us with their knowledge :-)
0 likes   

caneman

#2236 Postby caneman » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:13 pm

DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote:
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
caneman wrote:
cycloneye wrote: HOWEVER...THE DYNAMICAL MODELS
STEER WILMA NORTHWESTWARD INTO THE YUCATAN PENINSULA DURING THE
NEXT 12-24 HR...A MOTION THAT IS NOT SUPPORTED BY THE CURRENT RIGHT
TURN OR THE JET DATA. THEREFORE...THE FORECAST TRACK WILL BE WELL
TO THE RIGHT OF THE MODEL GUIDANCE...


On the talking tropics show Mike Watkins just said that the sentence above may have huge implications because of the upper pattern may change the 00z models.


Which way further South than Naples or more North?


I think he is talking about the Intensity


caneman about intensity.


For better or worse at Florida landfall?


No Question ...Thinking WOrse


gulp..............
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#2237 Postby CHRISTY » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:14 pm

i think this is huge info coming from the noaa jet ...the fact that wilma has been moving right..which models were turning wilma west into cancun that may not happen i think this will big for florida we may end up with a stronger storm...
0 likes   

6SpeedTA95
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1206
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 3:25 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

#2238 Postby 6SpeedTA95 » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:14 pm

The eye finally starting to get its act together.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145653
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

#2239 Postby cycloneye » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:15 pm

caneman yes it all depends on how strong Wilma arrives at Florida if Wilma goes inland over the Yucatan or not and the discussion talked about a possibility that what the gulfstream jet informed with it's data possibly Wilma may not get inland at the Yucatan.
Last edited by cycloneye on Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
CronkPSU
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2014
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 10:44 pm
Location: Avalon Park, FL

#2240 Postby CronkPSU » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:15 pm

CHRISTY wrote:i think this is huge info coming from the noaa jet ...the fact that wilma has been moving right..which models were turning wilma west into cancun that may not happen i think this will big for florida we may end up with a stronger storm...


that would be my guess as well, where is derek?
0 likes   


Return to “2005”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests