DESTRUCTION5 wrote:Ok who's updating the Models tonight? GFS is ready to go..
I think we're about out to 30 or so hours thus far. Should know a lot VERY soon...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
jkt21787 wrote:THead wrote:Yeah, I was assuming, and hoping they meant it would only POSSIBLY be a Cat 3. I'd be amazed if it was any stronger, but we've been amazed too much this year. Like when someone posted recon the other night at 901mb while she was bombing, i said 'rrrrrrrrrrrright'...
And I had to correct you to tell you it was in fact right. I still hope you didn't hurt yourself afterward! I know I almost tipped over in my chair when I saw it!
jkt21787 wrote:Scorpion wrote:GFS is still on crack.
Haven't looked at the output, but the GFS is running normal with all of the data, nothing bad according to NCEP. This will be a very credible run as far as I'm concerned.
Scorpion wrote:jkt21787 wrote:Scorpion wrote:GFS is still on crack.
Haven't looked at the output, but the GFS is running normal with all of the data, nothing bad according to NCEP. This will be a very credible run as far as I'm concerned.
It takes it straight west into the Yucatan. Clearly that will not happen.
Scorpion wrote:jkt21787 wrote:Scorpion wrote:GFS is still on crack.
Haven't looked at the output, but the GFS is running normal with all of the data, nothing bad according to NCEP. This will be a very credible run as far as I'm concerned.
It takes it straight west into the Yucatan. Clearly that will not happen.
Stratosphere747 wrote:skysummit wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:jkt21787 wrote:Let me add I do think its wrong though
LMAO..No doubt..
...and this is supposed to be the credible GFS we've been waiting on?
Yes...It has the the full data from the NOAA flight...
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests