Wilma Likely Back to Cat 5 Status
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
Foladar0
Yep...930...despite the improved appearance of the eye...but still a formidible hurricane.
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... RNT12.KNHC
Also...and this is probably the biggest piece of news here...
19.5N 86.0W
Still moving mostly north...
One thing to note...recon may not have found the highest winds yet...they could be in the eastern quad.
MW
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... RNT12.KNHC
Also...and this is probably the biggest piece of news here...
19.5N 86.0W
Still moving mostly north...
One thing to note...recon may not have found the highest winds yet...they could be in the eastern quad.
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
-
Foladar0
MWatkins wrote:Yep...930...despite the improved appearance of the eye...but still a formidible hurricane.
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... RNT12.KNHC
Also...and this is probably the biggest piece of news here...
19.5N 86.0W
Still moving mostly north.
MW
8PM was 19.1N 85.9W
so yeah, mostly north. Is that bad or good for S FLA?
0 likes
Foladar0 wrote:MWatkins wrote:Yep...930...despite the improved appearance of the eye...but still a formidible hurricane.
http://twister.sbs.ohio-state.edu/text/ ... RNT12.KNHC
Also...and this is probably the biggest piece of news here...
19.5N 86.0W
Still moving mostly north.
MW
8PM was 19.1N 85.9W
so yeah, mostly north. Is that bad or good for S FLA?
If you want to be exact, it's at 19.433, 86.033.
Nothing extremely significant, but it's a little worse for south Florida because it might not spend that much time over land.
0 likes
-
kevin
-
curtadams
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 1122
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
- Location: Orange, California
- Contact:
Big clear eyes don't mean incredibly strong and overcast doesn't mean weak - just a tendency. Wilma is weakening because she doesn't have Cat 5 convection. Good structure can't overcome a lack of energy. Tuesday night she was NOAA grey everywhere; today she's a mix of red and orange. Big difference, and here's the proof.
0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
curtadams wrote:Big clear eyes don't mean incredibly strong and overcast doesn't mean weak - just a tendency. Wilma is weakening because she doesn't have Cat 5 convection. Good structure can't overcome a lack of energy. Tuesday night she was NOAA grey everywhere; today she's a mix of red and orange. Big difference, and here's the proof.
Hmm....don't know about that. Right now she has more convection than Katrina had when Kat was 160mph.
0 likes
bahamaswx wrote:I disagree. Western semi-circle is still pretty eroded. She needs a bit more time yet.
I still stand that with more time she'll begin to reintensify
Pressures should start falling again in a few hours (although I doubt they will dop much), provided land interaction and dry air isn't disrupting her as much as it looks like it might be....
Last edited by bahamaswx on Fri Oct 21, 2005 1:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
skysummit wrote:curtadams wrote:Big clear eyes don't mean incredibly strong and overcast doesn't mean weak - just a tendency. Wilma is weakening because she doesn't have Cat 5 convection. Good structure can't overcome a lack of energy. Tuesday night she was NOAA grey everywhere; today she's a mix of red and orange. Big difference, and here's the proof.
Hmm....don't know about that. Right now she has more convection than Katrina had when Kat was 160mph.
She has no less energy than a 'typical' cat5 hurricane. She simply had an insanely cold (and most impressive) CDO during her time as a cat5.
0 likes
- skysummit
- S2K Supporter

- Posts: 5305
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Ponchatoula, LA
- Contact:
bahamaswx wrote:skysummit wrote:curtadams wrote:Big clear eyes don't mean incredibly strong and overcast doesn't mean weak - just a tendency. Wilma is weakening because she doesn't have Cat 5 convection. Good structure can't overcome a lack of energy. Tuesday night she was NOAA grey everywhere; today she's a mix of red and orange. Big difference, and here's the proof.
Hmm....don't know about that. Right now she has more convection than Katrina had when Kat was 160mph.
She has no less energy than a 'typical' cat5 hurricane. She simply had an insanely cold (and most impressive) CDO during her time as a cat5.
That she did.....that CDO was amazing when she was a 5.
0 likes
Before I go to bed...looks like the good old UKIE has the best handle on the synoptic environment for Wilma...good to see there is at least one model in agreement with the current motion. Hard to see Wilma getting trapped on the backside of the Gulf ridge like the GFS and GFDL are advertisting...
http://www.met-office.gov.uk/sec2/sec2c ... wtnt80.txt
MW
http://www.met-office.gov.uk/sec2/sec2c ... wtnt80.txt
MW
0 likes
Updating on the twitter now: http://www.twitter.com/@watkinstrack
-
Foladar0
MWatkins wrote:Before I go to bed...looks like the good old UKIE has the best handle on the synoptic environment for Wilma...good to see there is at least one model in agreement with the current motion. Hard to see Wilma getting trapped on the backside of the Gulf ridge like the GFS and GFDL are advertisting...
http://www.met-office.gov.uk/sec2/sec2c ... wtnt80.txt
MW
Assuming it's the same one on Wunderground, this would run it across the upper Keys and extreme southern Fla?
0 likes
-
Anonymous
~Floydbuster wrote:Quite frankly...Im not all that impressed even with satellite. The cloud tops are warmer than they should be, the hurricane has been shown now that it is somewhat small.
I suspect the people in the Yucatan are "impressed".
Just because she's not as pretty on images comapred to the record setting
rapid intensification cycle, she will still produce catastrophic damage to
the Yucatan Peninsula. Water has built all night from the north into
Cozumel, and will only get wose as the western eyewall approaches.
Pray for these people, they will be devastated, much like here.
Unfortunately, Mexico does not have the resources that the US
does for aid and assistance.
0 likes
-
superfly
-
clueless newbie
- Tropical Storm

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2003 9:11 pm
My clueless newbie opinion re: why she isn't Cat5 again:
She has plenty enough convection, however, looking at the Cancun radar there are two distinct concentric eyewalls, the inner one at 30miles, and the outer one maybe 70! miles diameter (the outer one is closed ring on radar as well!). I think the outer eyewall is partially starving the inner one, and that prevents further intensification. The inner one is still pretty strong so don't expect eyewall replacement cycle any soon, it's just not as strong as it could have been had the outer organisation been different.
This is good news for Cancun/Cozumel, weak Cat 4 is better then strong Cat 5, but they are stilll in for long and rough ride...
She has plenty enough convection, however, looking at the Cancun radar there are two distinct concentric eyewalls, the inner one at 30miles, and the outer one maybe 70! miles diameter (the outer one is closed ring on radar as well!). I think the outer eyewall is partially starving the inner one, and that prevents further intensification. The inner one is still pretty strong so don't expect eyewall replacement cycle any soon, it's just not as strong as it could have been had the outer organisation been different.
This is good news for Cancun/Cozumel, weak Cat 4 is better then strong Cat 5, but they are stilll in for long and rough ride...
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Hammy and 411 guests



