

Moderator: S2k Moderators
brunota2003 wrote:And before you guys go, how can you say that was ONLY a Cat 1, take a look at these pictures:That was ONLY from strong TS winds, which was from an 85 MPH Hurricane off the coast of NC known as Pain in the Butt Ophelia, when you can explain those, then complain about Wilma, I'm still seeing tarps on SCHOOLS around here from ONLY a Cat 1, which we ONLY got TS winds from, so maybe some people need a gut check, guess what, anything with the word HURRICANE before its name is going to be bad, welcome to the 2005 Hurricane Season...
Windtalker1 wrote:That this was caused by a Cat 1 Hurricane...... http://lan.atlaspencil.com/hurricanewilma.html
~Floydbuster wrote:Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Actually, it doesn't look any worse than Katrina's Cat1 landfall in South Florida. I can believe that damage was caused by a Cat1. I mean, think about straightline winds. Out here in the Texas prairies, we have lines of severe thunderstorms that can sometimes carry winds of 50-60mph, sometimes with higher gusts. They only last about as long as the thunderstorm, perhaps half an hour, but I would not be surprised to see straightline winds cause all of the damage I saw in those pictures. Mobile homes are no match for genuine straightline winds either, and an unsupported brick wall isn't the most secure structure to begin with. Shingles always go flying, and debris like that probably caused alot of those broken windows you see, and trees and power lines wouldn't even stand up to a strong tropical storm. The only additional thing you had was the surge, which even at 6-10 feet, could easily flip those cars. Think about how powerful a fast-moving flash flood is. They only need to be a few feet deep, and it's right along the beach.
What's really scary is that Wilma might become more expensive than Andrew...without actually doing any real structural damage aside from mobile homes. The post-Andrew building codes have saved South Florida from the prospect of structural damage outside of an enormous landalling Category 4 or 5, but there are just so many soft targets that price tags near Andrew, Wilma, Charley, and Ivan may become routine every time a major hurricane strikes the Florida peninsula. Even Frances became like the 5th costliest hurricane (after Hugo, as of 2004) just by striking Florida as a Category 2. Keep in mind, West-Central Florida and Northern Florida still haven't been tested at all, meaning that none of their "soft targets" have been weeded out yet, meaning that a Wilma-type storm striking the Tampa area sometime in the future may end up being just as costly as Wilma, and Wilma was actually a fairly routine situation in the Gulf of Mexico in October. It probably won't be very many more years.
Exactly, sustained 50 mph winds to the average joe, may seem like Cat 1. Then when they have a gust to 99 mph, they think they just had a gust to 130 mph.
Return to “Hurricane Recovery and Aftermath”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests