TD GAMMA,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Interesting.
000
URNT12 KNHC 191805
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 19/17:43:30Z
B. 16 deg 14 min N
085 deg 12 min W
C. NA mb NA m
D. 50 kt
E. 10 deg 076 nm
F. 039 deg 046 kt
G. 010 deg 077 nm
H. EXTRAP 1005 mb
I. 19 C/ 212 m
J. 25 C/ 214 m
K. 23 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/ 1
O. 0.02 / 2 nm
P. AF300 0427A GAMMA OB 07
MAX FL WIND 46 KT NW QUAD 17:06:50 Z
SLP EXTRAP FROM 1500 FT.
A 6-degree thermal eyewall? WTF?
000
URNT12 KNHC 191805
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 19/17:43:30Z
B. 16 deg 14 min N
085 deg 12 min W
C. NA mb NA m
D. 50 kt
E. 10 deg 076 nm
F. 039 deg 046 kt
G. 010 deg 077 nm
H. EXTRAP 1005 mb
I. 19 C/ 212 m
J. 25 C/ 214 m
K. 23 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/ 1
O. 0.02 / 2 nm
P. AF300 0427A GAMMA OB 07
MAX FL WIND 46 KT NW QUAD 17:06:50 Z
SLP EXTRAP FROM 1500 FT.
A 6-degree thermal eyewall? WTF?
0 likes
- cycloneye
- Admin
- Posts: 143865
- Age: 68
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
- Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Forecaster Colby wrote:Interesting.
000
URNT12 KNHC 191805
VORTEX DATA MESSAGE
A. 19/17:43:30Z
B. 16 deg 14 min N
085 deg 12 min W
C. NA mb NA m
D. 50 kt
E. 10 deg 076 nm
F. 039 deg 046 kt
G. 010 deg 077 nm
H. EXTRAP 1005 mb
I. 19 C/ 212 m
J. 25 C/ 214 m
K. 23 C/ NA
L. NA
M. NA
N. 12345/ 1
O. 0.02 / 2 nm
P. AF300 0427A GAMMA OB 07
MAX FL WIND 46 KT NW QUAD 17:06:50 Z
SLP EXTRAP FROM 1500 FT.
A 6-degree thermal eyewall? WTF?
You can comment about the recon data at thread below.













http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 14&start=0
0 likes
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22951
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
The weak LLC is now fully exposed and very visible. I put it near 16.2/85.0. Satellite looks indicate a nearly due east movement at about 10 kts. Convection continues to move farther away to the north. Heaviest squalls are now 140 miles NNE of the center. It's a real stretch calling Gamma a TS.
Edit: Actually, as of 2PM CST, the heaviest squalls are 200 miles from the center at a heading of 37 degrees.
Edit: Actually, as of 2PM CST, the heaviest squalls are 200 miles from the center at a heading of 37 degrees.
0 likes
I saw that. Last I looked it was <<slight>> but severe weather is a possibilty..especially with the cold front squall line. Mariners better heed the warning as well. Waterspouts are possible if not likely as well.mike815 wrote:Yeah that squall line could be nasty spc has central fl penisula flaged for severe late sun. Mon.
0 likes
wxman57 wrote:The weak LLC is now fully exposed and very visible. I put it near 16.2/85.0. Satellite looks indicate a nearly due east movement at about 10 kts. Convection continues to move farther away to the north. Heaviest squalls are now 140 miles NNE of the center. It's a real stretch calling Gamma a TS.
Edit: Actually, as of 2PM CST, the heaviest squalls are 200 miles from the center at a heading of 37 degrees.
That is not true...The recon has found 49 knot winds to support the storm as a tropical storm. It doe's not matter if there is convection over the LLC it matters more by the strength of the LLC. Fact is theres tropical storm one minute winds.
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22951
- Age: 67
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:wxman57 wrote:The weak LLC is now fully exposed and very visible. I put it near 16.2/85.0. Satellite looks indicate a nearly due east movement at about 10 kts. Convection continues to move farther away to the north. Heaviest squalls are now 140 miles NNE of the center. It's a real stretch calling Gamma a TS.
Edit: Actually, as of 2PM CST, the heaviest squalls are 200 miles from the center at a heading of 37 degrees.
That is not true...The recon has found 49 knot winds to support the storm as a tropical storm. It doe's not matter if there is convection over the LLC it matters more by the strength of the LLC. Fact is theres tropical storm one minute winds.
Actually, the conversion from 1500 feet is 70%. 70% of 49 kts is 34 kts. And that wind was in a squall quite a long distance removed from the center. Since that recon report, squalls have diminished, so calling Gamma a TS is a real stretch.
0 likes
- P.K.
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 5149
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
- Location: Watford, England
- Contact:
wxman57 wrote:Actually, the conversion from 1500 feet is 70%. 70% of 49 kts is 34 kts. And that wind was in a squall quite a long distance removed from the center. Since that recon report, squalls have diminished, so calling Gamma a TS is a real stretch.
They weren't high though, only at 200m.
Yesterday senorpepr quoted Stacy Stewart as saying
Stacy Stewart wrote:
we use the same recon-to-surface wind conversion
values of 90% at 9,000-10,000 ft, 80% at 1500 ft and 5,000 ft, and 75%
at 2500 ft"
I'm getting confused at the moment as to which conversion rates are correct.

0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests