Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire opens everywhere Nov. 18

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#41 Postby TexasStooge » Fri Nov 25, 2005 10:32 pm

streetsoldier wrote:
DaylilyDawn wrote:My hubby and I went to see this movie today. It wasn't as good as the others to me. Too much violencethat was not necessary.


If you read the books, the violence only gets worse, volume by volume; as Harry Potter evolves into the ONE person who has to confront and destroy Lord Voldemort.

"Necessary"? YES, when one is dealing with unconstrained evil personified.


Well said.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter

User avatar
streetsoldier
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 9705
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Under the rainbow

#42 Postby streetsoldier » Sun Nov 27, 2005 8:04 am

Harry's movie will take in $205M by days end, according to the news...I don't think the actors, directors or Ms. Rowling ever have to worry about poverty.
0 likes   

Dee Bee
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1360
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Vero Beach, FL

#43 Postby Dee Bee » Sun Nov 27, 2005 7:45 pm

My daughter and I went to see the movie Friday evening. It was quite dark -- parents should take the PG-13 warning seriously (unlike many parents and their obviously underage children in the audience I sat with...). As usual, the film was excellent, a most effective combination of teenage angst, amazing feats, special effects, and thoughtful themes. The young actors are growing within their personae very well; and if I hadn't known Ralph Fiennes was Voldemort, I would have never guessed!
0 likes   

User avatar
weathermom
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 760
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: North Jersey

#44 Postby weathermom » Mon Nov 28, 2005 9:00 am

My underage (8yr old) child was one in an audience this weekend. She is also fairly easily frightened. I was honestly more concerned when she read the book than I was when she saw it on screen. I knew she could chose to not look at the scary parts, and that she knew what was coming next because she had read it all before. I think what you picture in your imagination when reading can be much more frightening than what you see on a screen ( or hear when your eyes are covered!). I am not sure I would recommend it for a child who thinks it is going to be like the others, but for a child who knows exactly what is in the story and makes the decision on their own it is ok.

Personally, I think they jumped from action scene to action scene and left out an awful lot of story. I understand that they had a very limited amount of time for a tremendous amount of information, but was somewhat disappointed anyway. I enjoyed what I was watching, and it never slowed down, the time flew past, but what was in the movie didn't nearly cover the book.
0 likes   

User avatar
TexasStooge
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 38127
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 1:22 pm
Location: Irving (Dallas County), TX
Contact:

#45 Postby TexasStooge » Mon Nov 28, 2005 10:38 am

Speaking of Scary Movies (yeah, I know. I'm going off-topic on this one), when I was 6, my mom took me to the movies to see "Nightmare on Elm Street", and I didn't even flinch one bit.
0 likes   
Weather Enthusiast since 1991.
- Facebook
- Twitter


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests