Season 2005
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1268
- Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm
-
- Category 3
- Posts: 869
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 10:13 pm
- Location: Fayetteville, NC
- Contact:
- southerngale
- Retired Staff
- Posts: 27418
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
- Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)
- johngaltfla
- Category 5
- Posts: 2069
- Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:17 pm
- Location: Sarasota County, FL
- Contact:
- Aslkahuna
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4550
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 5:00 pm
- Location: Tucson, AZ
- Contact:
The following list of MEASURED (and NOT satellite estimated) pressures for storms should interest everyone
STY Tip 870mb 1979
STY June 876mb 1975
STY Ida 877mb 1958
STY Nora 877mb 1973
STY Rita 878 mb 1978
STY Vanessa 879mb 1984
HR WILMA 882mb 2005
STY Forrest 883mb 1983
Those are the 8 storms with the 7 LOWEST MEASURED SLPS in the World as measured by recon. Based upon what I saw in my perusal of the JTWC ATCRs, the pressure for Gilbert (888mb) may not be in the top ten anymore. Be that as it may, Wilma's lowest pressure of 882 mb would have been fairly noteworthy in WPAC
Steve
STY Tip 870mb 1979
STY June 876mb 1975
STY Ida 877mb 1958
STY Nora 877mb 1973
STY Rita 878 mb 1978
STY Vanessa 879mb 1984
HR WILMA 882mb 2005
STY Forrest 883mb 1983
Those are the 8 storms with the 7 LOWEST MEASURED SLPS in the World as measured by recon. Based upon what I saw in my perusal of the JTWC ATCRs, the pressure for Gilbert (888mb) may not be in the top ten anymore. Be that as it may, Wilma's lowest pressure of 882 mb would have been fairly noteworthy in WPAC
Steve
0 likes
- DESTRUCTION5
- Category 5
- Posts: 4423
- Age: 43
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:25 am
- Location: Stuart, FL
-
- Tropical Depression
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:46 am
- Location: Boca Raton, Florida
How about the number of times someone expressed relief that something isn't as bad as it could be this year, just before it got worse?
Hurricane Katrina - 'thank god it has dropped to a cat 4 just before landfall...at least it won't exceed Camille'...followed by record storm surge and total annihilation in Mississippi exceeding what Camille did.
Hurricane Katrina - 'well, it's early morning here in New Orleans, and thank god we've dodged the bullet. The storm jogged east at the last minute, sparing New Orleans the catastrophic flooding they feared'...followed by the catastrophic flooding they feared.
Hurricane Rita - 'well it looks like it didn't have the expected storm surge and avoided Galveston, so the gulf coast dodged another bullet'...followed by catastrophic surge in SW Louisiana and dozens of small towns wiped off the coast.
Hurricane Stan - 'well, thank god it is going to quickly lose strength and not have any significant impact'...followed by the remnants killing thousands as it flooded out mountain villages.
Hurricane Wilma - 'Thank god it is moving very fast as it approaches Florida...it shouldn't have much more than a minor impact on heavily populated areas of south Florida, and should spare the Keys and Cuba'...followed by a major impact on South Florida, swamping Key West and Cuba's worst flood in Havana in 100 years.
Despite the increasing accuracy of the forecasting and prediction of hurricanes, the talking heads and sensationalist news agencies who speak without knowledge and often too soon are still making everyone look bad. Either they overplay a storm's impact for days leading up, and when it fails to live up to the hype people stop taking storms as seriously, or they start making far-too-early comments about the reducing threat and danger causing people to find themselves unprepared as a storm makes a surprising impact.
I wonder if a storm will ever hit the United States where the news agencies don't have to have an idiot in a raincoat leaning into the wind and talking about the rain stinging their face...and maybe one day we'll have a destructive storm in which the news agencies will actually let emergency and government agencies do their work, get organized, and assess damage and infrastructure before making their own predictions about how much damage there is and how well or badly it was handled...3 minutes after the storm has passed.
Hurricane Katrina - 'thank god it has dropped to a cat 4 just before landfall...at least it won't exceed Camille'...followed by record storm surge and total annihilation in Mississippi exceeding what Camille did.
Hurricane Katrina - 'well, it's early morning here in New Orleans, and thank god we've dodged the bullet. The storm jogged east at the last minute, sparing New Orleans the catastrophic flooding they feared'...followed by the catastrophic flooding they feared.
Hurricane Rita - 'well it looks like it didn't have the expected storm surge and avoided Galveston, so the gulf coast dodged another bullet'...followed by catastrophic surge in SW Louisiana and dozens of small towns wiped off the coast.
Hurricane Stan - 'well, thank god it is going to quickly lose strength and not have any significant impact'...followed by the remnants killing thousands as it flooded out mountain villages.
Hurricane Wilma - 'Thank god it is moving very fast as it approaches Florida...it shouldn't have much more than a minor impact on heavily populated areas of south Florida, and should spare the Keys and Cuba'...followed by a major impact on South Florida, swamping Key West and Cuba's worst flood in Havana in 100 years.
Despite the increasing accuracy of the forecasting and prediction of hurricanes, the talking heads and sensationalist news agencies who speak without knowledge and often too soon are still making everyone look bad. Either they overplay a storm's impact for days leading up, and when it fails to live up to the hype people stop taking storms as seriously, or they start making far-too-early comments about the reducing threat and danger causing people to find themselves unprepared as a storm makes a surprising impact.
I wonder if a storm will ever hit the United States where the news agencies don't have to have an idiot in a raincoat leaning into the wind and talking about the rain stinging their face...and maybe one day we'll have a destructive storm in which the news agencies will actually let emergency and government agencies do their work, get organized, and assess damage and infrastructure before making their own predictions about how much damage there is and how well or badly it was handled...3 minutes after the storm has passed.
0 likes
- TheEuropean
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 1797
- Age: 60
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 3:17 pm
- Location: Voerde, Germany
- Contact:
If we had only beaten the record by 1 or 2, then it would've been the Cat 5s. Although the pair of strong Cat 4s is almost as unlikely. However, the fact that we beat the maximum by 5 storms and the maximum number of depressions by 8 is amazing. Think of how small the odds of this are given mean and standard deviation.
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AnnularCane and 82 guests