Wouldn't global warming affect Atlantic Basin first?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Wouldn't global warming affect Atlantic Basin first?

#1 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:13 pm

Since the waters are shallower in altantic basin- and can
therefore warm up sooner than waters of other basins
in the event of global warming?
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#2 Postby HURAKAN » Thu Dec 15, 2005 3:20 pm

Deepest Oceans and Seas

The planet is approximately 71% water and contains (5) five oceans, including the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, Pacific and Southern.

(deepest oceans and seas)

#1 Pacific Ocean (35,837 ft) (10,924 meters)
#2 Atlantic Ocean (30,246 ft) (9,219 meters)
#3 Indian Ocean (24,460 ft) (7,455 meters)
#4 Caribbean Sea (22,788 ft) (6,946 meters)
#5 Arctic Ocean (18,456 ft) (5,625 meters)
#6 South China Sea (16,456 ft) (5,016 meters)
#7 Bering Sea (15,659 ft) (4,773 meters)
#8 Mediterranean Sea (15,197 ft) (4,632 meters)
#9 Gulf of Mexico (12,425 ft) (3,787 meters)

#10 Japan Sea (12,276 ft) (3,742 meters)

Note that official depths for the Southern Ocean are not available at this time.

Image

http://worldatlas.com/aatlas/infopage/deepest.htm
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#3 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:15 pm

So GOM and Carribean would heat up before the Atlantic?
But the volume of water is less in there?
Just Wondering... 8-)
0 likes   

kevin

#4 Postby kevin » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:24 pm

I'm still upset about this southern ocean nonsense, the only reason the arctic ocean exists is because there is an ocean basin up there with the ice floating on top of the water.
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Wouldn't global warming affect Atlantic Basin first?

#5 Postby x-y-no » Thu Dec 15, 2005 4:44 pm

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Since the waters are shallower in altantic basin- and can
therefore warm up sooner than waters of other basins
in the event of global warming?


No, the rate of overturning is very slow relative to the volume of water, and most of the heat absorbed by the surface waters is returned to the atmosphere before subsidence.

The relative depths of the ocean basins play essentially no role in the observed surface warming.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Wouldn't global warming affect Atlantic Basin first?

#6 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:38 pm

x-y-no wrote:
Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Since the waters are shallower in altantic basin- and can
therefore warm up sooner than waters of other basins
in the event of global warming?


No, the rate of overturning is very slow relative to the volume of water, and most of the heat absorbed by the surface waters is returned to the atmosphere before subsidence.

The relative depths of the ocean basins play essentially no role in the observed surface warming.


Thanks for explanation...but now I have yet another
question generated.... :D
So Oceanic Heat Content is a measure of subsidence?
0 likes   

User avatar
P.K.
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 5149
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 5:57 pm
Location: Watford, England
Contact:

#7 Postby P.K. » Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:41 pm

I don't think many people look in the Global section but the Met Office have released something about this years temperatures which is relevant to this thread that I have posted to here: http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=79483
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Wouldn't global warming affect Atlantic Basin first?

#8 Postby x-y-no » Fri Dec 16, 2005 9:28 am

Tampa Bay Hurricane wrote:Thanks for explanation...but now I have yet another
question generated.... :D
So Oceanic Heat Content is a measure of subsidence?


Certainly not in any simple way. It's true that the water won't sink until it's dense enough and that requires it be cold, but even in a much warmer world the Arctic will be cold enough to accomplish that. And once again, the bulk of the heat winds up back in the atmosphere, not transported down into the abyssal ocean.

At any rate, when you see references to oceanic heat content, they're generally actually talking about the heat in the surface mixed layer (the first couple of hundred meters or so).

Temperatures in the abyssal ocean change only extremely slowly and by small increments. Of cource, there's a huge volume of water down there, so even a tiny increment in average temperature would be a very large amount of energy, but the interaction with the atmosphere is on timescales of many centuries, so it's not a significant factor in climate change - more of a fixed boundary condition.

Ocean circulation, OTOH, including the subsidence rate, is a huge factor in climate dynamics - hence the concern over possibilites like freshening of the North Atlantic surface waters affecting the THC.
0 likes   

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5597
Age: 37
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#9 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Fri Dec 16, 2005 10:30 am

So ocean circulation must be a huge factor...
Thus the thermohaline circulation
Thank you for explanations 8-)
Interesting stuff about THC:

http://www.sos.bangor.ac.uk/~oss041/des ... p01-08.htm
0 likes   

User avatar
Terrell
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:10 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida

#10 Postby Terrell » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:17 pm

Is it within the realm of possibilities, that Global Warming could cause more shear in the atlantic, and end up reducing our hurricanes?
0 likes   

User avatar
x-y-no
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8359
Age: 65
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 12:14 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL

#11 Postby x-y-no » Fri Dec 16, 2005 1:25 pm

Terrell wrote:Is it within the realm of possibilities, that Global Warming could cause more shear in the atlantic, and end up reducing our hurricanes?


Yes, certainly, although I'm not aware of any modelling which actually predicts that.
0 likes   

User avatar
Terrell
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 634
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 5:10 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida

#12 Postby Terrell » Fri Dec 16, 2005 7:27 pm

x-y-no wrote:
Terrell wrote:Is it within the realm of possibilities, that Global Warming could cause more shear in the atlantic, and end up reducing our hurricanes?


Yes, certainly, although I'm not aware of any modelling which actually predicts that.


Thanks
0 likes   

curtadams
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1122
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 7:57 pm
Location: Orange, California
Contact:

#13 Postby curtadams » Fri Dec 16, 2005 11:34 pm

Terrell wrote:Is it within the realm of possibilities, that Global Warming could cause more shear in the atlantic, and end up reducing our hurricanes?


It's *possible*, but the primary component of shear is Hadley cells and westerlies, which are driven by the temperature gradient from Equator to pole. That's why shear is so much higher in winter than summer. Global Warming is reducing the Equator-pole gradient, so it will in general reduce shear. It's possible that additional shifts could shift the locations with higher shear around so that the Atlantic actually experienced more, but that's unlikely.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 635
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

#14 Postby NC George » Sat Dec 17, 2005 9:39 pm

HURAKAN wrote:Deepest Oceans and Seas

The planet is approximately 71% water and contains (5) five oceans, including the Arctic, Atlantic, Indian, Pacific and Southern.

(deepest oceans and seas)

#1 Pacific Ocean (35,837 ft) (10,924 meters)
#2 Atlantic Ocean (30,246 ft) (9,219 meters)
#3 Indian Ocean (24,460 ft) (7,455 meters)
#4 Caribbean Sea (22,788 ft) (6,946 meters)
#5 Arctic Ocean (18,456 ft) (5,625 meters)
#6 South China Sea (16,456 ft) (5,016 meters)
#7 Bering Sea (15,659 ft) (4,773 meters)
#8 Mediterranean Sea (15,197 ft) (4,632 meters)
#9 Gulf of Mexico (12,425 ft) (3,787 meters)

#10 Japan Sea (12,276 ft) (3,742 meters)

Note that official depths for the Southern Ocean are not available at this time.

Image

http://worldatlas.com/aatlas/infopage/deepest.htm



This data is worthless in regards to what we are discussing. This is a list of the single deepest portion of each ocean, which is invariably in a narrow trench, not indicative of the ocean's depth in general. What is needed for this comparison is the average depth of the ocean in it's entirety.
0 likes   

User avatar
NC George
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 635
Age: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Washington, NC, USA

#15 Postby NC George » Sat Dec 17, 2005 10:16 pm

From: http://pao.cnmoc.navy.mil/pao/Educate/OceanTalk2/indexoceans.htm

Average depth of:

Pacific: 13000 ft
Indian: 12750 ft
Atlantic: 12000 ft

There is no mention of the 'Southern Ocean' in this writeup, so I can understand you being upset. However, I find something else more interesting - The Arctic Sea (that's right, I claim it's a sea, not an ocean.)

Point 1) In the discussion of the Atlantic, it states it runs from the North Pole and goes southward.

Point 2) Look at the map of the Arctic Ocean at the bottom of the page. This gives more of a perspective from the pole down, and from this angle, it appears the Arctic Ocean is clearly an extension of the Atlantic. I can see maybe the portion between the Lomonosov Ridge and North America being named a seperate sea, similar to the Carribean, but an ocean, no. In fact, the Lomonosov Ridge seems to be an extension of the mid-atlantic ridge, with Greenland merely being a portion that juts above the surface.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 79 guests