Kudos to Derek Ortt and Daniel Stern for recognizing Katrina

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Margie

#21 Postby Margie » Wed Dec 21, 2005 1:19 am

MGC wrote:Margi, the article on the 17th street levee is wrong. The sheet pilings were the correct depth when a few were pulled out.


A team of well-respected experts has proven otherwise. What are you basing your statement on?
0 likes   

User avatar
Tri-State_1925
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 11:16 am
Location: Worcester Hills, MA

#22 Postby Tri-State_1925 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:30 am

I thought from initial reports that this was already being called a 3 at landfall. Oh well...now it's offically a 3. No surprise.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#23 Postby wxman57 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:37 am

I wonder what the author considers a "slow-moving" storm? Katrina was moving at around 16 kts at landfall and accelerating. That's definitely NOT slow-moving, and it's one reason that it carried the strong winds well inland into northern MS.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#24 Postby wxman57 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:39 am

Margie wrote:
MGC wrote:Margi, the article on the 17th street levee is wrong. The sheet pilings were the correct depth when a few were pulled out.


A team of well-respected experts has proven otherwise. What are you basing your statement on?


Margie, I saw the news report on the pilings as well. It looked like they may have been too short using sonar, but when the pilings were actually pulled out they were the correct 17ft depth.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#25 Postby Pearl River » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:53 am

From the New Orleans Times-Picayune

The measurements taken Tuesday support the corps' long-standing contention that the sheet pilings supporting the floodwall were driven to 17.5 feet below sea level, and cast doubt on seismic testing done by the corps and an investigative team working for the state that indicated the pilings were driven only to 10 feet below sea level.

What they are looking at now is the problem may have been that the canal was dredged too deep.
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#26 Postby terstorm1012 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:55 am

Are they planning on closing off the Gulf Outlet?


Oh--------good work to Derek and his fellow collegue....you stuck by your story even when most of us were like "you're crazy, dude."

:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#27 Postby Pearl River » Wed Dec 21, 2005 8:59 am

They are playing around with the idae of closing it, but I don't think they have made that decision as of yet.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#28 Postby Pearl River » Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:01 am

Derek, you were right. My apologies to you sir.
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#29 Postby terstorm1012 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 9:20 am

That Katrina report was still sad to read ... 4,000 still missing? oh my goodness...
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#30 Postby Pearl River » Wed Dec 21, 2005 10:31 am

terstorm1012 said

That Katrina report was still sad to read ... 4,000 still missing? oh my goodness...


Whats even sadder. Alot of those missing are children.
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#31 Postby terstorm1012 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 3:52 pm

Pearl River wrote:terstorm1012 said

That Katrina report was still sad to read ... 4,000 still missing? oh my goodness...


Whats even sadder. Alot of those missing are children.


That is truely heartbreaking! :cry:
0 likes   

User avatar
Jam151
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:09 pm

#32 Postby Jam151 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:32 pm

I depends on who you believe.....Ivor van Heerden was the one all emergency management planners laughed when he made suggestions for "Big One" planning.

LSU expert defends piling tests
Corps' findings no absolution, he says


http://www.nola.com/printer/printer.ssf ... 141790.xml
0 likes   

Zackiedawg
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 87
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2005 10:46 am
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

#33 Postby Zackiedawg » Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:49 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:what this tells us is... actually design the levees to withstand a category 3 hurricane, and the region will be many times safer. We had levees that failed in cat 1 conditions


Question: How long would it take for the storm surge 'bulge', along with wind-formed waves, to recede after the hurricane drops its winds to a lower category?

I've wondered if there is any accurate way to estimate this, as a storm like Katrina brings the problems to light. Katrina was at one point a strong Cat 5 storm, and during much of her approach to land was still a strong Cat 4 storm. So over the several days that she churned through the gulf at Cat 5 or 4, and considering the large size of the storm's hurricane windfield, she built up a high cat 4 to cat 5 storm surge.

So if hours before landfall, the hurricane's winds were measured at Cat 3 strength, meaning she downgraded just before hitting land, would it not take much more time for the seas ahead of her to 'calm' to a level more appropriate to a smaller storm?

It seems like Katrina downgraded her windspeed before striking land, but her surge was still at Cat 4 level or more as it pushed up on shore. Combined with the shallow ramp up on the gulf coast and the high tide, the surge seemed to be equal to a Cat 4 or 5 storm.

And though New Orleans experienced no more than Cat 1 winds, wouldn't they too have been fecing the effects of a far stronger surge? A ripple travelling across a pond does not greatly diminish in height as it travels...the degredation of strength, speed and height is much slower in water than in air. So despite Katrina's Cat 3 deintensification, it would seem logical to conclude that much of the Mississippi coast received high cat 4 or cat 5 surge, and New Orleans' lakes and canals were bulged by surge of at least Cat 3.

Any opinion?
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#34 Postby f5 » Wed Dec 21, 2005 4:55 pm

Katrina was odd,very odd her winds might have been weaker but guess what she kick Camille's butt as far as storm surge go.she took alway Andrew's pride as far as being the costliest
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5907
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

#35 Postby MGC » Wed Dec 21, 2005 5:47 pm

The water in the 17th street canal reached 14 feet. The levees failed around 11 feet. Since when is 14 feet a Cat-1 surge?....MGC
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#36 Postby Derek Ortt » Wed Dec 21, 2005 5:49 pm

for a shallow place like Lake Ponchartrain, that is not unreasonable. Apalachee Bay had 10 feet from tropical storm conditions with Dennis

it matters not what the intensity is in the open ocean... there is no open ocean surge, except that due to the abrometric pressure. The surge does not pile up until the hurricane moves onto the shelf. What remains though are the waves generated while at sea
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#37 Postby Pearl River » Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:29 pm

Lake Pontchartrain is indeed a shallow lake abt 12-14 ft deep, deeper in some dredged areas. A strong east wind for a couple of days, depending on tidal height, will raise the lake a couple of feet. Even though the pilings in the 17th street canal were at 17.5 ft, some areas of the canal were dredged to 18.5 ft. The thinking now is the water undermined the pilings.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#38 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:01 pm

Pearl River wrote:Lake Pontchartrain is indeed a shallow lake abt 12-14 ft deep, deeper in some dredged areas. A strong east wind for a couple of days, depending on tidal height, will raise the lake a couple of feet. Even though the pilings in the 17th street canal were at 17.5 ft, some areas of the canal were dredged to 18.5 ft. The thinking now is the water undermined the pilings.


Wow, considering how large it is, that seems like a very shallow lake.

Same with Lake Okeechobee. That lake is only about 20 feet deep.
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#39 Postby HurricaneBill » Wed Dec 21, 2005 11:11 pm

Here you go, Derek!

Image
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6685
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#40 Postby Stormcenter » Thu Dec 22, 2005 11:56 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:when a cat 4 or 5 hits land, it means that total destruction can be caused by wind alone,. Charley produced less surge than TS Gabrielle did, its winds were powerful enough to devastate everything

I want anyone who still lives in New orleans or is planning to go back to know this. The city did NOT experience a major hurricane. Please do not be lulled asleep into thinking katrina was as bad as it gets. if a 4 moves into the city, vertical evacuation is not possible as the winds will destroy anything above the surge


I think everyone along the LA, MS, & AL got the message this time around. By the way I don't believe ANYONE in along the LA. & MS. believes it can get any worse when they've lost EVERYTHING due to Katrina's flood causing storm surge. Derek how can you tell these folks it can get any worse? It just can't. I've seen it first hand. They don't have anything. To them it can't any worse than what Katrina did. In "their" eyes Katrina was and always be as bad as it can get.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: gib, kenayers and 67 guests