February 11-12, 2006 Snowstorm: Initial Estimates

Winter Weather Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#21 Postby WindRunner » Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:17 am

I know the watch just put out from Sterling was talking about a large swath of 5"+ snowfall across the LWX region, with the watch saying up to 10" and the AFD claiming 12" max across Central MD/E VA. I'm hoping for that area to shift a little west, though :D . Unfortunately, doesn't look like that will happen this time.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

Snowfall amounts a little too light

#22 Postby Windtalker1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 6:25 am

Initial Snowfall Estimates:

Albany: 4"-8"
Baltimore: 5"-8"
Boston: 12"-18"
Concord: 8"-12"
Hagerstown: 6"-12"
Hartford: 16"-22"
Islip: 5"-10"
New York City: 7"-12"
Newark: 6"-12"
Philadelphia: 5"-10"
Portland: 7"-12"
Providence: 12"-16"
Richmond: 4"-8"
Washington, DC: 3"-6"
DCA: 3"-6"
IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 14"-18" These are my thoughts on snowfall amounts. Just a gut feeling. I think this will be worse than whats expected. This sucker is going to bomb big time with snowfall rates of 3" an hour Saturday night/Sunday Morning with Blizzard condictions for Southern New England.
0 likes   

BlizzzardMan
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 3:59 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

#23 Postby BlizzzardMan » Fri Feb 10, 2006 7:39 am

Just to add Pittsburgh to the mix, the local mets are saying 2 to 4 for Saturday with some additional accumulation Saturday night. Maybe 3 to 5 total here as of now before it ends.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#24 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:21 am

Some early morning thoughts...

∙ It appears to me that the 2/10 6z NAM has shifted to an eastward outlier. Yesterday, at one point, it was a westward outlier. I don't like its lack of continuity.

The key to watch will be whether the NAM corrects itself or other models trend in its direction. My belief is that the the 0z GFS/ECMWF offer a reasonable idea on the storm's track.

∙ The GFS and ECMWF are now in reasonably good agreement. This should translate into a decent snowstorm for the big cities.

∙ The 6z ensemble mean continues to bring the 1" qpf very close to NYC and then later close to Boston (see attached map). In short, don't dismiss the NAM outright but don't embrace it without reservation either.

∙ For now, I have good confidence that many of my numbers are in the ballpark. Some adjustments might be required later.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#25 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:22 am

Tri-State,

It looks like this will be moving fairly quickly
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#26 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:23 am

Blizzardman,

I'll look at Pittsburgh. When I post revised numbers later today (after at least the 12z guidance), I'll include Pittsburgh in the mix.
0 likes   

Dave C
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 868
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 4:36 pm
Location: Middleboro, Mass.(midway between Cape Cod and Boston)

#27 Postby Dave C » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:38 am

The latest disc. from Taunton
http://www.erh.noaa.gov/box/products/BOSAFDBOX
In their disc. they mentioned a "tropopause fold" never heard that before.
0 likes   

User avatar
isobar
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2002
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:05 am
Location: Louisville, KY

#28 Postby isobar » Fri Feb 10, 2006 10:24 am

Dave C wrote:The latest disc. from Taunton
http://www.erh.noaa.gov/box/products/BOSAFDBOX
In their disc. they mentioned a "tropopause fold" never heard that before.


00Z GFS RUN ALSO SHOWING TREMENDOUS WARM
AIR ADVECTION AT 300 MB...WHICH MAY BE A SIGNAL FOR A TROPOPAUSE
FOLD LATE SATURDAY NIGHT INTO SUNDAY.


That's an interesting statement. Typically there's a temperature inversion in the tropopause, but 300mb is just below. So perhaps the temps in the tropopause w/b cooler than at 300mb and thus will create even higher lift? Maybe Don or someone can shed some light.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

#29 Postby Windtalker1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 1:00 pm

0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#30 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:46 pm

At this time, I continue to rely more heavily on the GFS, which has maintained good continuity over the past several days, than the NAM. The NAM has tended to be an outlier to the west and then to the east. The fact the ensemble data (means, majority of members and SREF) and 2/10 0z ECMWF and 2/10 12z UKMET lend decent support gives me added confidence.

It should be noted that there remains room for increases across parts of New Jersey, the greater NYC area, and southern New England, particularly where intense banding occurs/sets up. I'll reserve judgment on that impact perhaps after I've seen the 2/11 0z data.

Revised Snowfall Estimates:

Albany: 2"-5"
Asheville: 1"-3"
Baltimore: 3"-7"
Boone: 3"-7"
Boston: 8"-14"
Chattanooga: 2" or less
Concord: 4"-8"
Hagerstown: 4"-8"
Hartford: 5"-10"
Hickory: 1"-3"
Islip: 5"-10"
Knoxville: 2"-5"
Lexington: 2"-5"
Nashville: 1"-3"
New York City: 5"-10"
Newark: 5"-10"
Philadelphia: 4"-8"
Pittsburgh: 1"-3"
Portland: 4"-8"
Providence: 6"-12"
Richmond: 2"-5"
Washington, DC:
.....DCA: 3"-7"
.....IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 6"-12"

Historic Tidbit:

While one waits for the snowstorm to move into the Tennessee Valley, Mid-Atlantic and New England states, the following is an excerpt that was printed in the December 5, 1786 edition of the Litchfield Weekly Monitor:

Yesterday, about three o'clock, P.M. a heavy wind from the N.E. began to threaten us with an approaching storm; at half past three, a thick and incessant shower of snow descended; which, with the wind, seemed to increase all night: This morning the gale was observed at N.W. and, owing to the great quantity of snow, and terrible drifts, every avenue of communication appeared impassible--The storm still continues (1 o'clock) with increasing violence.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windtalker1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 523
Age: 37
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 11:00 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

#31 Postby Windtalker1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:52 pm

donsutherland1 wrote:At this time, I continue to rely more heavily on the GFS, which has maintained good continuity over the past several days, than the NAM. The NAM has tended to be an outlier to the west and then to the east. The fact the ensemble data (means, majority of members and SREF) and 2/10 0z ECMWF and 2/10 12z UKMET lend decent support gives me added confidence.

It should be noted that there remains room for increases across parts of New Jersey, the greater NYC area, and southern New England, particularly where intense banding occurs/sets up. I'll reserve judgment on that impact perhaps after I've seen the 2/11 0z data.

Revised Snowfall Estimates:

Albany: 2"-5"
Asheville: 1"-3"
Baltimore: 3"-7"
Boone: 3"-7"
Boston: 8"-14"
Chattanooga: 2" or less
Concord: 4"-8"
Hagerstown: 4"-8"
Hartford: 5"-10"
Hickory: 1"-3"
Islip: 5"-10"
Knoxville: 2"-5"
Lexington: 2"-5"
Nashville: 1"-3"
New York City: 5"-10"
Newark: 5"-10"
Philadelphia: 4"-8"
Pittsburgh: 1"-3"
Portland: 4"-8"
Providence: 6"-12"
Richmond: 2"-5"
Washington, DC:
.....DCA: 3"-7"
.....IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 6"-12"

Historic Tidbit:

While one waits for the snowstorm to move into the Tennessee Valley, Mid-Atlantic and New England states, the following is an excerpt that was printed in the December 5, 1786 edition of the Litchfield Weekly Monitor:

Yesterday, about three o'clock, P.M. a heavy wind from the N.E. began to threaten us with an approaching storm; at half past three, a thick and incessant shower of snow descended; which, with the wind, seemed to increase all night: This morning the gale was observed at N.W. and, owing to the great quantity of snow, and terrible drifts, every avenue of communication appeared impassible--The storm still continues (1 o'clock) with increasing violence.
Very nice Tidbit 8-)
0 likes   

User avatar
WaitingForSiren
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Contact:

#32 Postby WaitingForSiren » Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:05 pm

I think Dons updated snowfall totals are right on. The models have trended further east and slightly less amplified/deeper with this storm, so the snowfall totals should pile up higher JUST south of NYC. Not exactly the perfect storm.
0 likes   

countbob
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 8:40 am

#33 Postby countbob » Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:37 pm

Initial Snowfall Estimates:

Albany: 3"-7"
Baltimore: 3"-7"
Boston: 8"-14"
Concord: 6"-10"
Hagerstown: 5"-10"
Hartford: 5"-10"
Islip: 3"-7"
New York City: 5"-10"
Newark: 5"-10"
Philadelphia: 4"-8"
Portland: 5"-10"
Providence: 6"-12"
Richmond: 2" or less
Washington, DC:
DCA: 3"-6"
IAD: 3"-7"
Worcester: 8"-14"

Man, we get mostly slop in Richmond. Even thr Great Blizzard of '93 was a bust here.

I want REAL snow! :cheesy:
0 likes   

User avatar
JenyEliza
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1529
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: Metro ATL

#34 Postby JenyEliza » Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:40 pm

countbob wrote:
Man, we get mostly slop in Richmond. Even thr Great Blizzard of '93 was a bust here.

I want REAL snow! :cheesy:


Did you get any snow in '93?

Where I live in the NW suburbs of Atlanta, we had right at a foot. :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#35 Postby ohiostorm » Fri Feb 10, 2006 4:57 pm

Local mets at Pittsburgh now forecasting an inch or so overnight tonight with 1 to 2 inches tomorrow with an additional inch Sat night.
0 likes   

paweatherguy
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 4:07 pm

#36 Postby paweatherguy » Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:20 pm

Pittsburgh discussion said models teding more south and east.so we will end up with a flurry!!!!! Makes me mad...........
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#37 Postby Dean4Storms » Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:37 pm

I was in the Mountains of east TN. during the SS of 93 and you don't want none of that. We had 28 inches with drifts to 10 ft. with winds gusting that night up to 60 mph. I had to dig out of the back door and clear an area for my dog to go take a dump, without power for a week. When it gets that deep it is NO fun to walk through.
0 likes   

donsutherland1
S2K Analyst
S2K Analyst
Posts: 2718
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2003 8:49 pm
Location: New York

#38 Postby donsutherland1 » Fri Feb 10, 2006 5:40 pm

Countbob,

Those were my initial estimates from yesterday. This afternoon, I raised Richmond to 2"-5".
0 likes   

User avatar
ohiostorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1582
Age: 40
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 2:51 pm
Location: Orlando, FL
Contact:

#39 Postby ohiostorm » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:54 pm

Yeah they will lower the totals tonight for Pittsburgh.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#40 Postby Jim Cantore » Fri Feb 10, 2006 8:59 pm

I hope I get 3 feet :lol:
0 likes   


Return to “Winter Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests