Tyler wrote:southerngale wrote:hmmm.....I did read your posts. I know you said you busted - no biggie. My only point from both of my posts was simply a suggestion to not be so matter-of-fact with exactly what WILL happen when you can't possibly know, but moreso to give your opinion. I only showed one example. I also said that I enjoyed the analysis and discussion. I thought it was a tip to help you in the future as I've seen others say exactly what is going to happen over and over, and it never happens exactly as they say. Weather is very hard to predict!
As to NWS busting, I'm sorry, but I haven't seen that yet. I'm not saying it hasn't happened, but I haven't seen it. They said 54° here and the official high was 53° - wow, awesome in my book.
The high was lower where I am, as I posted on page 1, but I don't live right by the airport.
I saw Hobby Airport hit 53° - I thought that was right about what they forecast for there.
But we didn't stay in the 40's. I'm not knocking your forecast. You're not a met, and you did well with your analysis, etc. My point was just the "high and mighty" I'm right and NWS is wrong thing....for lack of a better way to word it, puts some people off.
And then they end up right...
You have not seen the NWS bust yet? Hmmm... IAH reached 51. Thats not mid-50s. College Station reached 48. Thats not mid 50s. Yes, they DID bust, and so did I, but thats not the point, and I'm not here to let people know how bad the NWS is, however, you sure are trying really hard to make it look like I am. I really respect the NWS, and think they do a great job, I just felt they were going to warm with temperatures, and I gave my opinion on this, considering this is a weather discussion board.
"high and mighty" I'm right and NWS wrong thing? What in the world? I'm sorry, but I'm really offended. How do you have the right to say that and label me as such? You are a moderator, obviously, your job is to moderate and see to it that those who are breaking the rules to be punished, warned or whatever, but I don't think that gives you the right to label people... All I did was point to my reasons of why I thought the NWS would be wrong and were to high with Saturday's temps (which they were), but even if they did get it right, I would have given them the kudos they deserve, and gladly ate my crow (and I ate crow anyway, I was dead wrong as well). Giving opinions or criticism to the NWS makes me someone who thinks he's "high and mighty"? I don't think so. Especially since I admitted I was wrong as well.
Okay, I think we're blowing this thing way out of porportion. But labeling me as a person who thinks he's "high and mighty, I'm right, and everyone else is wrong no matter what", is completely false, and I really don't appreciate it... I am sorry about giving my opinion on a NWS forecast, and I promise NEVER to do it again.
Whoa... Re-read my post. I never labeled you as "high and mighty" as you said 3 times. It was not a label on you, as even I admitted that I was struggling for the correct term to comment about how you were saying your forecast would be right and NWS would be wrong.
I think you read what you want to read as you completely ignored the compliments I gave and twisted what I thought was constructive criticism.
My point was never to knock your forecast, analysis, or whatever, as I already stated, but just your adamant way of I'm right and they're blind and wrong way of doing things. It just doesn't look very good and makes NWS look better in the end. I thought it might help you the next go 'round. Apparently, I was wrong.
I didn't really appreciate you putting words in my mouth, but whatever. I think you're going to see things how you want to anyway, so I'll just forgetaboutit. I thought I was clear in my posts (as others have been) that's there's a difference in giving your opinion on why you think a NWS forecast will be wrong and stating matter-of-factly that it will be. As it turned out, they were very close. Kudos to them!
I don't have nearly as many posts as you in these 2 threads. Perhaps reading mine again would avoid you construing what I say again.
