What is you favroite Computer model (as in accuracy)

[Derek Ortt]

RSMAS MM5

[dhweather]

RSMAS MM5

You're not biased on that, are you Derek?

[Dr. Jonah Rainwater]

HURRICANE WILMA DISCUSSION NUMBER 18
NWS TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
5 PM EDT WED OCT 19 2005

AGREEMENT AMONG THE TRACK GUIDANCE MODELS...WHICH HAD BEEN VERY GOOD
OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF DAYS...HAS COMPLETELY COLLAPSED TODAY. THE
06Z RUNS OF THE GFS...GFDL...AND NOGAPS MODELS ACCELERATED WILMA
RAPIDLY TOWARD NEW ENGLAND UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF A LARGE LOW
PRESSURE SYSTEM IN THE GREAT LAKES REGION. ALL THREE OF THESE
MODELS HAVE BACKED OFF OF THIS SOLUTION...WITH THE GFDL SHOWING AN
EXTREME CHANGE...WITH ITS 5-DAY POSITION SHIFTING A MERE 1650 NMI
FROM ITS PREVIOUS POSITION IN MAINE TO THE WESTERN TIP OF CUBA.

I like the LBAR alot myself. Sometimes when you're sick and tired of hurricanes, you just need that comedic relief that comes when the LBAR steers Tammy into Puerto Rico.

[x-y-no]

You left out the ECMWF.

I'd have to concur with Derek, though. The RSMAS MM5, which happily they put online this year, performed impressively.

[P.K.]

I'd have to concur with Derek, though. The RSMAS MM5, which happily they put online this year, performed impressively.

Where can you find that?

People might be able to guess which model I voted for. If I hadn't voted for that one it would have been the ECMWF.

[Derek Ortt]

http://orca.rsmas.miami.edu/~mm5/MM5_realtime/

that is an archive of all runs since Irene

Dennis, Emily, Franklin, and Gert are not there since these were not automated runs, but instead, runs that myself and Cangialosi manually did

[P.K.]

Thanks, even got some Hovmoller diagrams on there I see.