What could this mean for Yellowstone?

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

What could this mean for Yellowstone?

#1 Postby conestogo_flood » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:15 pm

There has bound to be someone here who knows something about Yellowstone.

Over the past few years, I can't find any earthquakes above 3.0 in Yellowstone, but in the hour there has been a 3.2. Could this come as a possible sign to some major changes in the caldera? The quake was in the eastern part just above the lake, still in the caldera. What does anyone have to say about what this might mean?

Magnitude 3.2 - YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING

2006 February 26 01:08:20 UTC
A minor earthquake occurred at 01:08:20 (UTC) on Sunday, February 26, 2006. The magnitude 3.2 event has been located in YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING. The hypocentral depth was poorly constrained. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

Earthquake Details
Magnitude 3.2
Date-Time Sunday, February 26, 2006 at 01:08:20 (UTC)
= Coordinated Universal Time
Saturday, February 25, 2006 at 6:08:20 PM
= local time at epicenter

Location 44.663°N, 110.434°W
Depth 0.3 km (~0.2 mile) (poorly constrained)
Region YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING
Distances 47 km (29 miles) SSE (152°) from Gardiner, MT
53 km (33 miles) E (90°) from West Yellowstone, MT
55 km (34 miles) SW (225°) from Cooke City-Silver Gate, MT
451 km (280 miles) NNE (15°) from Salt Lake City, UT

Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 0.7 km (0.4 miles); depth +/- 2.5 km (1.6 miles)
Parameters Nst= 24, Nph= 24, Dmin=11 km, Rmss=0.38 sec, Gp= 47°,
M-type=local magnitude (ML), Version=3
Source University of Utah Seismograph Stations

Event ID uu00007613
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#2 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:19 pm

could this be trouble for rainer?
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#3 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:20 pm

na...dont mark my words though, but as far as I know, it really doesnt mean anything other than Yellowstone is still active...
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#4 Postby conestogo_flood » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:23 pm

I don't know, I've been researching latelly, and ground uplift is increasing at Yellowstone. Could a 3.2 cause something at the caldera? All that pressure needs to escape, maybe this might cause the beginning of a crack or something. This has me edgy.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#5 Postby Derek Ortt » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:26 pm

well... the 9.0 on Boxing Day on Sumatra and subsequent 6-7.0 quakes did not affect Toba, despite the concerns that Toba would blow
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38110
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#6 Postby Brent » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:29 pm

If there are a series of quakes(especially 5 or higher), then I'd start to get concerned... but I wouldn't worry about one magnitude 3.
0 likes   
#neversummer

kevin

#7 Postby kevin » Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:57 pm

It means that Yellowstone is geologically active.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#8 Postby wxmann_91 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:13 pm

Yellowstone has always been geologically active... no worries. Heck there have been magnitude 7 quakes that have occurred the last century.
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#9 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:17 pm

Actually, Yellowstone could erupt. It has done so in the past.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38110
Age: 37
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#10 Postby Brent » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:20 pm

CapeVerdeWave wrote:Actually, Yellowstone could erupt. It has done so in the past.


640,000 years ago.

It will erupt someday... but not anytime soon IMO. We'll probably all be long gone when it happens(hopefully).
0 likes   
#neversummer

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#11 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:26 pm

dont quote me but i heard for every earthquake we are a year closer to a major eruption
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#12 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:43 pm

fact789 wrote:dont quote me but i heard for every earthquake we are a year closer to a major eruption

if that were true, then it should of erupted a while ago...look at the earthquake chart...if this pic works:
Image
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#13 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:45 pm

true whats the red line mean?
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#14 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:47 pm

i guess its the outer boundary of the caldera...
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#15 Postby brunota2003 » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:51 pm

heres the site that I got the chart from: http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/yvo/
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#16 Postby JonathanBelles » Sat Feb 25, 2006 10:52 pm

i know what the site is but ive never seen the red line before
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#17 Postby conestogo_flood » Sat Feb 25, 2006 11:45 pm

The red line is the outline of the caldera/magma chamber.
0 likes   

sprites

#18 Postby sprites » Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:23 am

actually yellowstone is much over due for one, but when is the issue.
0 likes   

User avatar
WindRunner
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5806
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 8:07 pm
Location: Warrenton, VA, but Albany, NY for school
Contact:

#19 Postby WindRunner » Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:05 am

Brent wrote:If there are a series of quakes(especially 5 or higher), then I'd start to get concerned... but I wouldn't worry about one magnitude 3.


Exactly. We've had stronger earthquakes than a 3.2 occur in VA - and there is NOTHING that is tectonically exciting about Virginia. A few 5s within a week or two of each other would start to scare me, but nothing less.
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#20 Postby conestogo_flood » Sun Feb 26, 2006 2:34 pm

Virginia isn't Yellowstone though. Yellowstone is a super volcano, over due for an eruption. There is a difference between ground movement and intense pressure built up underground waiting to get out in a massive eruption. Especially when there hasn't been any 3.0s+ at Yellowstone in the past few years.
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests