ERC'S at landfall?

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Jim Cantore

ERC'S at landfall?

#1 Postby Jim Cantore » Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:45 am

I've noticed several of these storms, some are obvious ERC's, others I'm not sure about, these are some I wonder about

Fran
Opal
Floyd
Michelle
Lili
Emily (in cozumel)
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#2 Postby JonathanBelles » Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:42 am

erc?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricanehink
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2041
Joined: Sun Nov 16, 2003 2:05 pm
Location: New Jersey

#3 Postby Hurricanehink » Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:43 am

Eyewall Replacement Cycle
0 likes   

JonathanBelles
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 11430
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2005 9:00 pm
Location: School: Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) Home: St. Petersburg, Florida
Contact:

#4 Postby JonathanBelles » Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:44 am

o duh ok
0 likes   

MiamiensisWx

#5 Postby MiamiensisWx » Sun Feb 26, 2006 11:55 am

I think Emily was undergoing an ERC at both Mexican landfalls.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#6 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:11 pm

Gilbert 1988 at Cancun landfall is the best example I could think of, as well as Wilma at Cozumel and Cancun landfalls.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#7 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Feb 26, 2006 12:30 pm

Im pretty sure Emily was...Did you guys see the pic of her under Cuba at her top strength? that easily out did Dennis that year and I was Impressed with Dennis. Then did you see Emily at landfall? there was no eye...

http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/tropic/archi ... ontage.gif
0 likes   

HurricaneBill
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3420
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: East Longmeadow, MA, USA

#8 Postby HurricaneBill » Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:01 pm

Wilma definitely finished one prior to landfall on the Yucatan. The eye cleared up and her overall structure improved.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#9 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:04 pm

HurricaneBill wrote:Wilma definitely finished one prior to landfall on the Yucatan. The eye cleared up and her overall structure improved.


As she finished one she started one again as she was making landfall on the Yucatan. Radar data supports this.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#10 Postby f5 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 3:39 pm

Emily looks like Charley's sister from the wide satallite vantiage point.she smaller than Andrew
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#11 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Feb 26, 2006 5:53 pm

even though Wilma had finished an EWRC just before landfall at Cozemul, the winds increased very rapidly and they were nearly back to cat 5 status. Wilma hit the Yucatan at 130KT
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#12 Postby wxman57 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:08 pm

It looks like Rita was beginning an ERC at landfall as well. Frances and Jeanne of 2004 were, too, at landfall. Eyewall replacement cycles are quite common in major hurricanes. They happen all the time, just about every day. However, they generally go unnoticed (or unrecognized by the NHC) out over the ocean. They're very difficult to predict, so the NHC will just typically keep the intensity constant rather than indicate a Cat 3 is weakening to a Cat 1 or 2 every day then going back up to a 3. In 1980, Allen went from a Cat 5 to a Cat 3 every day for 3 days as it crossed the Caribbean.

I don't think Lili was undergoing an ERC at landfall, more like an EDC (eyewall dissipation cycle - made that up) due to shear and dry air entrainment.
0 likes   

f5
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1550
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:29 pm
Location: Waco,tx

#13 Postby f5 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:26 pm

didn't Dry air have a role in Rita's case also beacuse the western semicircle was eroding somewhat
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#14 Postby wxman57 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:34 pm

f5 wrote:didn't Dry air have a role in Rita's case also beacuse the western semicircle was eroding somewhat


Definitely.
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#15 Postby Jim Cantore » Sun Feb 26, 2006 7:48 pm

wxman57 wrote:It looks like Rita was beginning an ERC at landfall as well. Frances and Jeanne of 2004 were, too, at landfall. Eyewall replacement cycles are quite common in major hurricanes. They happen all the time, just about every day. However, they generally go unnoticed (or unrecognized by the NHC) out over the ocean. They're very difficult to predict, so the NHC will just typically keep the intensity constant rather than indicate a Cat 3 is weakening to a Cat 1 or 2 every day then going back up to a 3. In 1980, Allen went from a Cat 5 to a Cat 3 every day for 3 days as it crossed the Caribbean.

I don't think Lili was undergoing an ERC at landfall, more like an EDC (eyewall dissipation cycle - made that up) due to shear and dry air entrainment.


are there certain conditions to stimulate it also?

it seems upcoming landfalls have been around the time of ERC'S
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#16 Postby wxmann_91 » Sun Feb 26, 2006 8:48 pm

wxmann_91 wrote:
HurricaneBill wrote:Wilma definitely finished one prior to landfall on the Yucatan. The eye cleared up and her overall structure improved.


As she finished one she started one again as she was making landfall on the Yucatan. Radar data supports this.


BTW here's an image for those interested

Image


And the weird thing is she was doing it over land, after emerging into the GOM:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#17 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:21 pm

Geez! I cant beleive what Derek Ortt said was true how it jetted up to 130 kts with such a big eye forming!! Wouldnt that cause it to maintain strength or only strengthen it very slowly?

But just hink about how much trouble florida wouldve been in if Wilma had missed the Yucatan...that would bring it in with at least CAT 4 winds...that wouldnt have been he only close call in the last 2 years tho...I remember them saying that if Ivan had curved east more then Florida wouldve had to deal with ivan as a CAT 5.
thats WAYYY scary!!
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#18 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:41 pm

the dropsondes indicated a possible cat 5 Yucatan landfall as a drop recorded 137KT, though BT shows 130. The 137 may not have been representative and may have been a spot wind

That just shows how quick the winds re-intensify once an EWRC is complete

Had Wilma not have hit the Yucatan, I am not sure how much worse it would have been. I do not believe that the upper level environment could have supported greater than a low end cat 4 (which I personally believe Wilma was when it hit the crocs, but believe it was weaker than NHC indicated when it hit the people). Therefore, Florida received about as bad as they could have received
0 likes   

Scorpion

#19 Postby Scorpion » Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:47 pm

I actually think Wilma hitting the Yucatan helped it cause more damage to South Florida. Had Wilma not have made landfall it likely would have kept its smaller eyewall, and hence could have been less resilient to the shear and lower SST's. Also the smaller eyewall would have impacted less people.
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#20 Postby cheezyWXguy » Sun Feb 26, 2006 9:57 pm

But either way its pretty amazing that Wilma may have made it back to CAT 5 just before it hit the coast...That storm was probably the fastest strengthener of all time (one night its a High end CAT 1 and the next morning its the strongest ever! When I saw that I almost fell out of my chair! I started rubbing my eyes to make sure they were correct and slapped myself in the face multiple times to make sure I wasnt dreaming)
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: StPeteMike and 64 guests