


Moderator: S2k Moderators
dhweather wrote:Opinions are so funny at times.
It's the biggest La Nina EVER
It's gonna fade out by hurricane season.
All we get to do is watch, it'll do what it wants to do.
Although we have reached the time of year when persistence is normally hard to beat, the recent drop into negative values shows that this is not a 'normal' year, and further forays into true La Niña conditions, or an unscheduled return to 'near-normal' both appear possible.
After a fairly rapid evolution of incipient La Niña conditions by early February, the past two weeks has seen some key indicators ease to levels more typical of neutral conditions. Specifically, central to eastern Pacific surface temperatures have risen abruptly, the SOI has fallen back to near zero and the Trade Winds have decreased to average intensity in the western to central Pacific. However, given the large mass of cooler than average water that remains in the subsurface of the eastern Pacific, it may be premature to assume this trend away from La Niña conditions will continue.
Adding to the uncertainty is the fact that we're nearing the ENSO prediction barrier of March to June, the time when predictability of the climate system is at its lowest, and the time when ENSO events usually decay or begin to form. Neverthelss, Australian and international computer models strongly suggest neutral conditions will be present by the middle of the year due to a steady warming of the central Pacific between now and the southern winter.
crabbyhermit wrote:I've heard La Nina means a bad hurricane season, and I've also read on these boards many predictions that the most likely landfalls for 06 will be Florida's west coast, the Eastern seaboard, and the Texas coast, NOT the NGOM (I'm in New Orleans, so that gives me some small comfort). Are such predictions based on La Nina? If so, could someone tell me how La Nina means canes might curve up to the East coast or steer straight west to Tex/Mex coast? A condensed, layman's version will suffice. Just trying to catch up here. Thanks!
Extremeweatherguy wrote:ou find that la nina years feature a much higher frequency of storms in the western gulf.
A good way would be to go to that Historical hurricane mapping site ( http://hurricane.csc.noaa.gov/hurricanes/ ) and then search for storms in a desired area during la nina vs. la nino years.ROCK wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:La Nina = Bad season for the western Gulf!
EWG- is there a way look up our last active decade (40's) and see what had back then as far as Nino, Nina, Neutral. Curious to see.....
Users browsing this forum: StPeteMike and 63 guests