Travolta’s new role is a drag for Scientology

Chat about anything and everything... (well almost anything) Whether it be the front porch or the pot belly stove or news of interest or a topic of your liking, this is the place to post it.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

Travolta’s new role is a drag for Scientology

#1 Postby alicia-w » Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:58 am

John Travolta’s decision to play a woman in “Hairspray” has raised eyebrows among some Scientology watchers.

The actor will reportedly dress in drag to take on the role of middle-aged mom Edna Turnblad in the high-camp John Waters film — a part made famous by the notorious cross-dresser Divine. Edna was later played on Broadway by outspoken gay activist Harvey Fierstein.

A recent Rolling Stone article about Scientology reports that its founder, L. Ron Hubbard, felt that gays “should be taken from … society as rapidly as possible” because “no social order will survive which does not remove these people from its midst.”


“If Hubbard had historically had his way there would be no John Waters films in America and no gay actors to play the part of Edna Turnblad,” notes Rick Ross on Cultnews.com, “which would of course leave Mr. Travolta with no new character role. And it’s doubtful that Scientology’s savior would find anything appealing about Travolta dressed in drag as Edna Turnblad.”

Image

He is one nice-looking man!!!
0 likes   

GalvestonDuck
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 15941
Age: 57
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 8:11 am
Location: Galveston, oh Galveston (And yeah, it's a barrier island. Wanna make something of it?)

#2 Postby GalvestonDuck » Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:14 am

Where's the problem (as far as Scientologists go)?

Travolta isn't gay and, as far as I can tell, he's not playing a gay character. A cross-dresser, maybe, but the article doesn't say the character is gay. (I haven't seen Hairspray, so I don't know.)

Furthermore, he's an actor. He's going to play personalities and characters who aren't like him -- otherwise, he'd be a really boring actor playing himself. He's played a killer before, but they don't have a problem with that?

Patrick Swayze is a Scientologist, but there was no big to-do about him playing a drag queen in "To Wong Foo, Thanks For Everything, Julie Newmar." Sharon Stone was a Scientologist (not anymore) and look at her character in Basic Instinct." They didn't make a deal about that.

There's a rule in theater (applies to movies, television, and the writing of those scripts, as well) -- "If it's not on the page, it's not on the stage." And even if the character is written as gay, it's doesn't change who the actor is. Non-Scientologists Patty Duke, Tom Hanks, and numerous others have played gay characters...and they are all straight.
0 likes   

User avatar
alicia-w
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6400
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 2:55 pm
Location: Tijeras, NM

#3 Postby alicia-w » Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:17 am

I know. I support Scientologists because I think there's a bit of validity there, but I found this odd and wanted to inspire some comments from others.... (like you!)
0 likes   


Return to “Off Topic”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests