Picture of Katrina's storm surge in Bay St. Louis

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
beachbum_al
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2163
Age: 55
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: South Alabama Coast
Contact:

Picture of Katrina's storm surge in Bay St. Louis

#1 Postby beachbum_al » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:05 pm

I was going through snopes looking for something and came across this. Just unbelievable and scary!

Here is the link

http://www.snopes.com/katrina/photos/surge.asp


Sorry if this has been done before.
0 likes   

User avatar
TSmith274
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 756
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 1:11 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

#2 Postby TSmith274 » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:11 pm

Actually, that picture was taken at NASA's Michoud facility in New Orleans East. Those plant workers have quite a story to go along with those pictures.

Here's the link to the rest of the pictures... the story is in there somewhere. I'll try to find it. http://www.wwltv.com/cleanup/160.htm

Found it... here's the story... http://www.wwltv.com/local/stories/WWL102405picture.27068e.html
0 likes   

User avatar
beachbum_al
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2163
Age: 55
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: South Alabama Coast
Contact:

#3 Postby beachbum_al » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:29 pm

Thank you! Those pictures are just...well hard to even imagine. Is this close to Chalmette LA. My dad worked at the Chalmette plant for several months.
0 likes   

User avatar
dhweather
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6199
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 9:29 pm
Location: Heath, TX
Contact:

#4 Postby dhweather » Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:57 pm

I e-mailed Snopes to inform them that is NOT from BSL, MS.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dr. Jonah Rainwater
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 569
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 2:45 pm
Location: Frisco, Texas
Contact:

#5 Postby Dr. Jonah Rainwater » Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:10 pm

Yowzers...

Show this to those officials nitpicking about "overtopping" vs "breaching"!
0 likes   

User avatar
cheezyWXguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6132
Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Dallas, TX

#6 Postby cheezyWXguy » Tue Mar 14, 2006 11:17 pm

incredablee pic!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneGirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5839
Age: 60
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Clare, Michigan
Contact:

#7 Postby HurricaneGirl » Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:15 am

:eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
HurryKane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Diamondhead, Mississippi

#8 Postby HurryKane » Thu Mar 16, 2006 10:59 am

dhweather wrote:I e-mailed Snopes to inform them that is NOT from BSL, MS.


They know it's not. :D

From the Snopes article:

Origins: The above-displayed photograph, which documents a storm surge created when Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast of the U.S. in late August 2005, is genuine (although the accompanying descriptions of the location it was taken from are sometimes inaccurate, and what it depicts might be more accurately described as water overflowing a levee rather than a true storm surge).

The image is one of a series captured by Don McClosky, manager of Entergy's Michoud power plant in New Orleans. Mr. McClosky rode out the storm at the power plant, from which he snapped pictures like the one displayed above. As WWL-TV noted of the event:


They also include this link which gives great detail about the images:
http://www.mgcollins.com/Katrina/MRGOPage.html
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#9 Postby brunota2003 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:13 pm

Dr. Jonah Rainwater wrote:Yowzers...

Show this to those officials nitpicking about "overtopping" vs "breaching"!
All in all, I dont think it matters if the levees where breached or overtopped...but...this was interesting from the guy that was there:
In a home video made by a worker at the power plant, you can hear Katrina's winds screaming through the power plant. McClosky and his crew watched as the levee reached the limits of its protection and water began pouring in. Eventually Katrina dumped between five and eight feet of water inside the power plant.

On the tape you can hear McClosky talk to his employees about moving higher as the water rose about a foot every ten minutes.

"There were waves up on top of that, that were probably 15 to 18 foot on top of what you saw form the hurricane protection levee that was out there"
If I'm reading that correct...the levees were indeed overtopped first...then most likely broke due to all the stress after they were overtopped...just an interesting thought IMHO...which would mean the NWS/NHC warning of them being overtopped was dead on...and people are STILL trying to trash the NHC...(no one here)
0 likes   

User avatar
Dionne
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1616
Age: 74
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2006 8:51 am
Location: SW Mississippi....Alaska transplant via a Southern Belle.

#10 Postby Dionne » Fri Mar 17, 2006 7:33 am

NASA satelite altimetry knew this surge was out there 48 hours prior to landfall.

It was never reported in advance. I have done the research and sent numerous emails. To the best of my understanding someone, somewhere along the media information line doubted the intensity of the data and failed to pass it along. 45 minutes before the eyewall made landfall a bouy off Dauphine island confirmed the data.

I am of the opinion that more people would have evacuated with this information.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29114
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#11 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:09 am

Dionne wrote:NASA satelite altimetry knew this surge was out there 48 hours prior to landfall.

It was never reported in advance. I have done the research and sent numerous emails. To the best of my understanding someone, somewhere along the media information line doubted the intensity of the data and failed to pass it along. 45 minutes before the eyewall made landfall a bouy off Dauphine island confirmed the data.

I am of the opinion that more people would have evacuated with this information.


I would like to see some sort of confirmation of this other than your own words. I'm not doubting you, but what you are stating has serious implications to it if indeed information such as this was withheld. I am not sure that people could have gotten out of harms way with that short of a notice(meaning the 45 minute confirmation at the Dauphine Island bouy), but if it was known in advance enough then as I always say BETTER SAFE THAN SORRY!!!
0 likes   

Jim Cantore

#12 Postby Jim Cantore » Fri Mar 17, 2006 11:12 am

Almost looks like a tsunami
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests