Historic outbreak Sunday: The aftermath

U.S. & Caribbean Weather Discussions and Severe Weather Events

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#841 Postby senorpepr » Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:37 pm

snoopj wrote:
simplykristi wrote:She may go overboard. But, I know she has helped save a lot of lives.

The helicopters stay out of harm's way. I watched two tornadoes wreak havoc right before my eyes on TV, thanks to helicopters.

Kristi


I can tell you that from the 5-4-03 storms, that if I didn't see that helicopter capturing a tornado on the ground in KCK, I probably wouldn't have seeked shelter so early. It might have been way too late by the time I realized it was super serious (insulation and other debris was landing in the apartment complex parking lot).

--snoopj


However... there are much safer ways to inform people than flying a helicopter through a storm. Much of the aviation field outlaws that sort of reckless flying and eventually it will led to a horrible accident. Remember, during a thunderstorm, hail can be projected miles from the storm. Additionally, air currents can become violent. Just one hail stone or one violent down-/updraft can crash a light-weight helicopter... killing the crew inside and whoever on the ground.
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#842 Postby wx247 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:43 pm

I am just curious senorpepr... I am not arguing with you... what other ways do you suggest? I think tower cams are a great option, but you could never possibly have enough.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
WaitingForSiren
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 383
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 12:58 pm
Location: Minneapolis,Minnesota
Contact:

#843 Postby WaitingForSiren » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:45 pm

I dont want to say that I am GLAD there was an f-4, as its not a good thing to have your house ripped apart, but I think for historical purposes it was a good thing. Now, there will be a REASOn to remember this amazing outbreak. And also, with so many tornado reports, its a shame to have them all be weak tornadoes (like may 30 2004)
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#844 Postby wxmann_91 » Wed Mar 15, 2006 10:56 pm

WaitingForSiren wrote:I dont want to say that I am GLAD there was an f-4, as its not a good thing to have your house ripped apart, but I think for historical purposes it was a good thing. Now, there will be a REASOn to remember this amazing outbreak. And also, with so many tornado reports, its a shame to have them all be weak tornadoes (like may 30 2004)


So, you want Mr. Tornado Outbreak to have muscles, eh? lol

*********************************************************

What I'm really happy about is how lucky we were. Downtown Springfield IL was missed by a few miles by that monster supercell, one supercell passed just to the south of Springfield MO and another produced right after leaving city limits. A hook passed through Columbia but fortunately it was cycling at that time. Three hooks passed right through downtown Kansas City during the initial stages of the outbreak but fortunately no tornadoes were dropped. Sedalia was nearly hit as well. Finally, during the last part of the outbreak, a hook passed right through downtown Jefferson City.

Considering how many major cities were traversed by major supercells (and especially hook echoes), it is amazing there were no fatalities from these major cities. I believe that had LCL's been a little lower and/or SRH/dynamics a little higher, not only had there been many more F4's and perhaps a few F5's, but the ultimate disaster - a sig/violent tornado tracking right through the heart of a downtown of a good sized city - could've occurred.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#845 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Mar 15, 2006 11:09 pm

Heck this may might have a tornadoe outbreak that has 500 tornadoes in 48 hours. With 10 f5s,40 f4s and 80 f3s. Maybe!
0 likes   

User avatar
senorpepr
Military Met/Moderator
Military Met/Moderator
Posts: 12542
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 9:22 pm
Location: Mackenbach, Germany
Contact:

#846 Postby senorpepr » Thu Mar 16, 2006 12:37 am

wx247 wrote:I am just curious senorpepr... I am not arguing with you... what other ways do you suggest? I think tower cams are a great option, but you could never possibly have enough.


Well, as you mentioned, tower cams are probably the best and safest option. Other than that... you're looking at crews actually on the ground. While you still run some risk with that option, it's a LOT safer than having a helicopter flying.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for forewarning people about severe weather, but having a helicopter flying with that danger on live TV is just plain stupid. Any level-headed aviator would steer clear of thunderstorms. As I mentioned before, hail can fly several miles outside of a thunderstorm. All it takes is one small hailstone to hit a blade and you have a falling helicopter--on live TV. The real reason they (media and 'newschoppers') provide this service is not to "save lives," but to compete with the other stations in town.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#847 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:06 am

Here's the breakdown now:

Total confirmed tornadoes - 55
F0's - 21
F1's - 15
F2's - 10
F3's - 8
F4's - 1
F5's - 0

That Columbia one by the looks of it was a tornado; they haven't confirmed it though and I'd say (based on damage reports) it was an F1 or at the most a low-end F2.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#848 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Mar 16, 2006 1:45 am

55 tornadoes with that outbreak?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#849 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 2:26 am

CrazyC83 wrote:Here's the breakdown now:

Total confirmed tornadoes - 55
F0's - 21
F1's - 15
F2's - 10
F3's - 8
F4's - 1
F5's - 0

That Columbia one by the looks of it was a tornado; they haven't confirmed it though and I'd say (based on damage reports) it was an F1 or at the most a low-end F2.


If you are getting the info from Sam's website, 15 of those tornadoes occurred from 3/9-11. :wink: Thus, there have only been 40 confirmed tornadoes from the outbreak.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#850 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Thu Mar 16, 2006 3:13 am

Yeah this thing is alot smaller then I thought. Wow!
0 likes   

simplykristi
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sat May 10, 2003 1:59 pm
Location: Near KCMO
Contact:

#851 Postby simplykristi » Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:35 am

I cannot believe that the damage in Lawrece KS was due to a microburst. I personally think that was a F0 tornado that went thru there. The storms were racing to the NE at over 45 MPH. They were spinning tornadoes up and down FAST.

Kristi
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#852 Postby wx247 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:15 am

senorpepr wrote:
wx247 wrote:I am just curious senorpepr... I am not arguing with you... what other ways do you suggest? I think tower cams are a great option, but you could never possibly have enough.


Well, as you mentioned, tower cams are probably the best and safest option. Other than that... you're looking at crews actually on the ground. While you still run some risk with that option, it's a LOT safer than having a helicopter flying.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for forewarning people about severe weather, but having a helicopter flying with that danger on live TV is just plain stupid. Any level-headed aviator would steer clear of thunderstorms. As I mentioned before, hail can fly several miles outside of a thunderstorm. All it takes is one small hailstone to hit a blade and you have a falling helicopter--on live TV. The real reason they (media and 'newschoppers') provide this service is not to "save lives," but to compete with the other stations in town.


That totally makes sense... and being a former intern/employee of a local tv station, I know all about the whole competition thing. I just don't think that there is anything capable of providing the same kinds of shots yet. I donrealize it is dangerous and they probably shouldn't do it, however.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#853 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 9:58 am

wxmann_91 wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:Here's the breakdown now:

Total confirmed tornadoes - 55
F0's - 21
F1's - 15
F2's - 10
F3's - 8
F4's - 1
F5's - 0

That Columbia one by the looks of it was a tornado; they haven't confirmed it though and I'd say (based on damage reports) it was an F1 or at the most a low-end F2.


If you are getting the info from Sam's website, 15 of those tornadoes occurred from 3/9-11. :wink: Thus, there have only been 40 confirmed tornadoes from the outbreak.

I want to correct myself - there were only 36 confirmed as 4 were from Monday.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#854 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:19 am

That's what I meant - whole outbreak, not just Sunday.
0 likes   

snoopj
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 530
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:46 pm
Location: KCMO
Contact:

#855 Postby snoopj » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:48 am

wxmann_91 wrote:What I'm really happy about is how lucky we were. Downtown Springfield IL was missed by a few miles by that monster supercell, one supercell passed just to the south of Springfield MO and another produced right after leaving city limits. A hook passed through Columbia but fortunately it was cycling at that time. Three hooks passed right through downtown Kansas City during the initial stages of the outbreak but fortunately no tornadoes were dropped. Sedalia was nearly hit as well. Finally, during the last part of the outbreak, a hook passed right through downtown Jefferson City.

Considering how many major cities were traversed by major supercells (and especially hook echoes), it is amazing there were no fatalities from these major cities. I believe that had LCL's been a little lower and/or SRH/dynamics a little higher, not only had there been many more F4's and perhaps a few F5's, but the ultimate disaster - a sig/violent tornado tracking right through the heart of a downtown of a good sized city - could've occurred.


KC did get lucky. I saw a wall cloud move immediately to my south. That's right OVER downtown. We had so many cells hit the area and THEN spawn their tornadoes. I'm very surprised KC didn't get hit harder than it did.

--snoopj
0 likes   

snoopj
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 530
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 9:46 pm
Location: KCMO
Contact:

#856 Postby snoopj » Thu Mar 16, 2006 11:51 am

senorpepr wrote:However... there are much safer ways to inform people than flying a helicopter through a storm. Much of the aviation field outlaws that sort of reckless flying and eventually it will led to a horrible accident. Remember, during a thunderstorm, hail can be projected miles from the storm. Additionally, air currents can become violent. Just one hail stone or one violent down-/updraft can crash a light-weight helicopter... killing the crew inside and whoever on the ground.


Oh, I agree with you. wx247 pointed this out as well. Ultimately, it's probably a ratings thing deep deep down. It's extremely stupid, but if you want start talking about being the first to broadcast it live, then you've apparently won something.

The helicopters work for traffic reports and aftermath of event reports, but really should be grounded during weather events. I'm waiting for an unexpected microburst to knock the Channel 9 helicopter right out of the sky during another storm one of these days.

--snoopj
0 likes   

conestogo_flood
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1268
Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 5:49 pm

#857 Postby conestogo_flood » Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:40 pm

Confirmed
F0 22
F1 17
F2 14
F3 10
F4 1
F5 0
64/140 reported.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#858 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:44 pm

I have counted 47 tornadoes from this outbreak

14 - EAX
12 - SGF
10 - LSX
6 - ILX
4 - TSA
1 - LOT
0 likes   

User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

#859 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Mar 16, 2006 7:50 pm

Tornado Warnings issued during March 11

LSX - 18
SGF - 15
PAH - 12
LZK - 7
TSA - 4
ILX - 2
IND - 1
Total - 59

March 12 up to 3 AM March 13

EAX - 45
SGF - 40
LSX - 32
TSA - 15
ILX - 11
DVN - 7
ICT - 5
LOT - 4
TOP - 2
MKX - 1
PAH - 1
DMX - 1
Total - 164
0 likes   

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

#860 Postby wx247 » Fri Mar 17, 2006 8:43 am

Springfield has continued to add tornadoes to their list. I don't know if you have checked Springfield (MO), but they have added some yesterday. There are just so many tracks to cover...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “USA & Caribbean Weather”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 17 guests