Portent For Keys?

Sanibel · #1 Postby **Sanibel** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:04 pm

Tallahassee broke its record high temperature on tuesday with a 91* reading. It was the earliest 90* was reached in the season.

It broke the previous record set in (now get this):

1935

YouTube · #2 Postby **hurricanetrack** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:06 pm

Hmmm...........

#3 Postby **brunota2003** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:13 pm

i wonder...

Stormsfury · #4 Postby **Stormsfury** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 3:16 pm

just because a record high temperature was broken today and ironically it was 1935 doesn't mean the weather pattern will act and react exactly the same way which would lead up to another 1935 labor day hurricane.

first of all, 1935 despite the Labor Day Hurricane, was a relatively inactive year.
I don't see 2006 being as relatively inactive as 1935 for one.

let's just say that the 1+1 = 2 equation doesn't necessarily apply when algebra and calculus is involved in the equation (being the variables of all the global factors plus evolving weather patterns, which undoubtedly will not be the same, etc.)

SF

#5 Postby **Hybridstorm_November2001** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 5:35 pm

I agree. That is nonsense. :roll:

CajunMama · #6 Postby **CajunMama** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:21 pm

This looks more like a USA weather thread.

Aquawind · #7 Postby **Aquawind** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 6:37 pm

Ohh geesh this is a stretch.. :cheesy:

Well Said SF.. nice to your posting again..

Paul

#8 Postby **gatorcane** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:14 pm

it is just another reason (ableit a stretch though) why we are reverting to weather patterns of the 1930s-1950s...where more hurricanes hit FL then any other time period we know.

Aquawind · #9 Postby **Aquawind** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:47 pm

boca_chris wrote:it is just another reason (ableit a stretch though) why we are reverting to weather patterns of the 1930s-1950s...where more hurricanes hit FL then any other time period we know.

Oh that's baloney..

Yeah were in a active period but a record temp at one location has NOTHING to do with Landfalls in Florida... This Hype talk is getting rather annoying. Posting if it rains in florida or breaks a record temp in florida is not relevant at this point for hurricane Season. Spring just started 2 days ago..

Paul

HurricaneHunter914 · #10 Postby **HurricaneHunter914** » Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:49 pm

Yeah and the temps won't be even close to the average over the next few days the temps. reminds me of winter.

Hurricaneman · #11 Postby **Hurricaneman** » Fri Mar 24, 2006 1:49 am

Sanibel wrote:Tallahassee broke its record high temperature on tuesday with a 91* reading. It was the earliest 90* was reached in the season.

It broke the previous record set in (now get this):

1935

Interesting how that just happened to be the record that was broken

#12 Postby **gatorcane** » Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:19 pm

Oh that's baloney..

Yeah were in a active period but a record temp at one location has NOTHING to do with Landfalls in Florida... This Hype talk is getting rather annoying. Posting if it rains in florida or breaks a record temp in florida is not relevant at this point for hurricane Season. Spring just started 2 days ago..

Paul I acknowledge your opinion but you are wrong. I do agree that some of the correlations can't be justified. I am sure we will not see the relatively lack of landfalling hurricane activing in FL that we saw from 1960 through 2003. It's possible FL will be spared this year or even the next BUT I really think that major hurricanes are on the way for the next couple of decades. I also have inside information on this theory. Look me up in 20 years after it has all happened :wink:

Aquawind · #13 Postby **Aquawind** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:29 am

Chris I am not wrong about anything. Your stretching to correlate one record high temp and hurricane activity in months to come.. Major hurricanes are a part of life for florida and can happen any year..

There is no inside information that a record high in Pensacola in March is a pretense to a major in Florida this year.. :roll:

I am fully aware we are in a active period of tropical develpoment and why..so enough with the insults..

Paul

AussieMark · #14 Postby **AussieMark** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 8:34 am

boca_chris wrote:
Oh that's baloney..

Yeah were in a active period but a record temp at one location has NOTHING to do with Landfalls in Florida... This Hype talk is getting rather annoying. Posting if it rains in florida or breaks a record temp in florida is not relevant at this point for hurricane Season. Spring just started 2 days ago..

Paul I acknowledge your opinion but you are wrong. I do agree that some of the correlations can't be justified. I am sure we will not see the relatively lack of landfalling hurricane activing in FL that we saw from 1960 through 2003. It's possible FL will be spared this year or even the next BUT I really think that major hurricanes are on the way for the next couple of decades. I also have inside information on this theory. Look me up in 20 years after it has all happened

the previous record being in 1935 is just pure coincidence nothing more nothing less.

And Paul knows about Florida Hurricanes been on the up after all he mentions it all the time :roll:

he just doesn't make 10 threads a day saying so to get noticed thats all :lol:

#15 Postby **gatorcane** » Sat Mar 25, 2006 3:11 pm

the previous record being in 1935 is just pure coincidence nothing more nothing less.

And Paul knows about Florida Hurricanes been on the up after all he mentions it all the time

he just doesn't make 10 threads a day saying so to get noticed thats

I do agree there are some serious stretches and superficial correlations. As I said I do acknowledge Paul's opinion. Actually the correlation is very little as the NWS Miami responded to my query about any correlation between strong Spring long wave patterns and U.S. hit frequency basically saying there is none. Sorry if I insulted to you.

Portent For Keys?

Portent For Keys?

Re: Portent For Keys?

Who is online