The Bare Necessities of Life

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

The Bare Necessities of Life

#1 Postby wxmann_91 » Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:09 pm

And if you recall correctly, one of them was the KLIX radar loop of the second half of Katrina, which everybody thought didn't exist anymore after the WFO/radar site supposedly went "down".

Ladies and gentlemen, I proudly present one necessity of life that hasn't been quite revealed yet... UNTIL NOW... the ENTIRE radar loop of Katrina from KLIX.

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ridge/Katrina/k ... _black.gif

http://www.srh.noaa.gov/ridge/Katrina/K ... o_loop.gif

Some observations:
1) Katrina's back side was much stronger than I originally thought, in fact, one of the bands that trained over NOLA (and likely contributed to the massive levee failures), was similar to the band that set up over Ft. Lauderdale during the back side of Wilma.
2) The presentation of the reformation of the eyewall on the KLIX radar was almost exactly the same as the KMOB.
3) NOLA East got PWNED as the western eyewall sat there for hours and hours. Meanwhile NOLA Ctrl and West, as stated, probably only received Cat 1 winds. 5-10 miles probably made the difference between 100+ and ~80 mph winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#2 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:40 pm

I recall that missing half :lol: Some people, on TV, were saying she was falling apart faster than predicted at the time :lol:
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#3 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:37 pm

Glad that was found. Maybe this will help change the NHC's report on Katrina.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#4 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:56 pm

Hurricane Hunter 914 wrote:Glad that was found. Maybe this will help change the NHC's report on Katrina.


I doubt it. I don't think there is much to change. I still think Cat. 3 sounds right...that eyewall is simply just not symetrical enough for this thing to have been a Cat. 4/5 at landfall. The strong band on the north side of the eyewall does not wrap all the way around and once making landfall, the back edge breaks up even more. For this thing to have been a 4, I would expect to see a completely wrapping eyewall, and for this to have been a 5, I would expect to see a completely circular and orange/red colored (strong) eyewall.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23022
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#5 Postby wxman57 » Sun Mar 26, 2006 9:34 am

Note how the western eyewall passed east of downtown New Orleans. That tiny jog east before landfall spared New Orleans considerably more wind damage, but put my mother's house in the Gulf of Mexico to the east.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests