Accuwx Issues Same Prediction Again

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#41 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 16, 2006 11:49 am

jschlitz wrote:
rockyman wrote:All I need to know about JB's predictions is summed up with his "risk map": Nova Scotia has a higher risk of a hurricane landfall than the Florida Panhandle. Even in a "bad (good) year," the Florida Panhandle should have a higher risk than Nova Scotia. This goes so far against climatology that it's ridiculous.

According to Hurricanecity.com, Cape Sable in Nova Scotia experiences a "direct hit" an average of once every 45 years. Destin once every 9.64 years.

I recommend everyone save this risk map now, because I doubt you'll see it again at the end of the season.


Yep, that was the point of my post. Apparently, in the video, it's explained that these risks are relative to normal. IMO it should say so on the map then. Otherwise, normally intelligent people are just confused.


Hurricane landfalls aren't as uncommon as you think up there though...in the past 11 years, there have been five hurricanes (Luis-95, Hortense-96, Michael-00, Gustav-02, Juan-03) and five tropical storms (Barry-95, Gert-99, Gabrielle-01, Karen-01, Ophelia-05) making landfall in Atlantic Canada.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1750
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

#42 Postby OuterBanker » Tue May 16, 2006 1:15 pm

East coast a major threat for 2006 hurricane season factors and information.

http://wwwa.accuweather.com/promo-ad.as ... hurr2006_2

I guess not really good news for NC. Hope he's wrong again.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#43 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 16, 2006 3:08 pm

Here are the areas I have come up with for subdividing the basins, and my 2006 risk estimate for each area:

Area 1 - East Coast
1A - Newfoundland - High
1B - Nova Scotia east of Metro Halifax - High
1C - Metro Halifax to NS/NB border - High
1D - NS/NB border to Portsmouth NH - High
1E - Portsmouth NH to Watch Hill RI - High

1F - Watch Hill RI to East Point NJ including Delaware Bay - Extreme
1G - East Point NJ to VA/NC border including Chesapeake Bay - Extreme
1H - VA/NC border to Surf City NC - Extreme
1I - Surf City NC to Edisto Beach SC - Extreme

1J - Edisto Beach SC to Fernandina Beach FL - High
1K - Fernandina Beach FL to Cocoa Beach FL - High
1L - Cocoa Beach FL to Jupiter Inlet FL - High

1M - Jupiter Inlet FL to S tip of FL mainland - Extreme
1N - Florida Keys - Extreme


Area 2 - Gulf of Mexico Coast
2A - S tip of FL mainland to Englewood FL - High
2B - Englewood FL to Suwannee River FL - High

2C - Suwannee River FL to Indian Pass FL - Moderate
2D - Indian Pass FL to FL/AL border - High
2E - FL/AL border to mouth of Pearl River - High
2F - Mouth of Pearl River to Intracoastal City LA - High
2G - Intracoastal City LA to Freeport TX - High

2H - Freeport TX to Corpus Christi TX - Extreme
2I - Corpus Christi TX to TX-Mexican border - Extreme
2J - TX-Mexican border to Tampico MX - Extreme

2K - Tampico MX to Palma Sola MX (20°N latitude) - High
2L - Palma Sola MX (20°N) to Veracruz/Tabasco border - High

2M - Veracruz/Tabasco border to Celestun MX - Moderate
2N - Celestun MX to Cabo Catoche MX (tip of Yucatan) - High

Area 3 - Caribbean Mainland Coast
3A - Cabo Catoche MX (tip of Yucatan) to Chetumal MX - Extreme
3B - Belize coast - Moderate
3C - Honduras coast - High
3D - Nicaragua coast - High

3E - Costa Rica coast - Moderate
3F - Panama coast W of the Panama Canal - Moderate

3G - Panama Canal to Cartagena - Low
3H - Cartagena to Maracaibo - Low
3I - Maracaibo to Venezuela/Guyana border - Low

3J - Guyana southward - Minimal

Area 4 - Caribbean Islands
4A - Cuba west of 80°W + Cayman Islands - Extreme
4B - Cuba from 77°W to 80°W - High
4C - Cuba east of 77°W - High
4D - Jamaica - High

4E - NW Bahamas - Extreme
4F - Central/SE Bahamas - Extreme

4G - Haiti - High
4H - Dominican Republic - High
4I - Puerto Rico - High
4J - Virgin Islands + French West Indies - High

4K - Windward Islands - Extreme
4L - Leeward Islands - High
4M - Trinidad and Tobago - Moderate
4N - Aruba + Netherlands Antilles - Moderate


Area 5 - Other Areas
5A - Bermuda - High
5B - Cape Verde Islands - Moderate
5C - Canary Islands - Low
5D - Azores - Moderate
5E - African coast - Minimal
5F - Mainland Europe west coast - Low
5G - European coast north of the English Channel - Low

5H - Iceland - Moderate
5I - Greenland coast - Moderate
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11162
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

#44 Postby Ivanhater » Tue May 16, 2006 3:16 pm

OMG, you have got to be kidding me, I'm in a low risk??? The northeast is at greater risk than me? Bad thing is, our local station(who subscribes to Accuweather :roll: ) was telling our area that it was good news for us. Any company who puts the northeast at greater risk than the Forida panhandle gets NO respect from me. Didnt they issue the same forecast last year? I guess if you keep giving the same prediction over and over, it will verify sometime, ok Accuweather :roll:
Last edited by Ivanhater on Tue May 16, 2006 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#45 Postby Steve » Tue May 16, 2006 3:18 pm

While an otherwise awesome presentation CrazyC83, in a million years how would you ever defend that list?

Steve
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#46 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 16, 2006 3:23 pm

Steve wrote:While an otherwise awesome presentation CrazyC83, in a million years how would you ever defend that list?

Steve


It's just my thought at this point. Since there are few spots that seem to be headed for a clearing, good time to prepare!
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34093
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#47 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue May 16, 2006 3:26 pm

ivanhater wrote:OMG, you have got to be kidding me, I'm in a low risk??? the northeast is at greater risk than me? Bad think is, our local station(who subscribes to accuweather :roll: ) was telling our area that it was good news for us. any company who puts the northeast at greater risk than the florida panhandle gets NO respect from me. Didnt they issue the same forecast last year? I guess if you keep giving the same prediction over and over, it will verify sometime, ok accuweather :roll:


While I agree that the Northeast is in for a mean surprise this year, that certainly does not put you out of the woods for a major storm from the Gulf either...
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#48 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue May 16, 2006 3:37 pm

ivanhater wrote:OMG, you have got to be kidding me, I'm in a low risk??? The northeast is at greater risk than me? Bad thing is, our local station(who subscribes to Accuweather :roll: ) was telling our area that it was good news for us. Any company who puts the northeast at greater risk than the Forida panhandle gets NO respect from me. Didnt they issue the same forecast last year? I guess if you keep giving the same prediction over and over, it will verify sometime, ok Accuweather :roll:
these low and high risk areas are based on the climatological average for the area. So a moderate risk in Alabama and a high risk in New York are really no different.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

#49 Postby Steve » Tue May 16, 2006 3:41 pm

>>OMG, you have got to be kidding me, I'm in a low risk??? The northeast is at greater risk than me? Bad thing is, our local station(who subscribes to Accuweather ) was telling our area that it was good news for us. Any company who puts the northeast at greater risk than the Forida panhandle gets NO respect from me. Didnt they issue the same forecast last year? I guess if you keep giving the same prediction over and over, it will verify sometime, ok Accuweather

No. That was already addressed. It's not a comparison of high risk to low risk it's compared to "as normal." I'm not trying to defend their graphic, because it's poorly done. But if you look at the 'abstract' (for lack of a better term) that OuterBanker posted, you will notice comments like "above normal" or "relative to normal." So what they're saying is not that Maine has a higher risk than Escambia Co. (as I said on Page 1 or 2), just that maybe Maine has a higher risk relative to climatological averages.

Steve
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#50 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Tue May 16, 2006 4:44 pm

Actually SE Newfoundland get both direct hits, and brushes more often than Nova Scotia does. After all Hortense in 1996 was the first hurricane to make landfall as a cat. 1 in the area since Blanche in 1975; that is of course a span of 21 years. Juan in 2003 was the first cat 2 to make landfall since Ginny in 1963; that is of course a span of 40 years.


Here in New Brunswick for example we have gone 36 years, since Gerda in 1969, without a direct hit by even a cat 1 hurricane. Ginny in 1963 was our last cat 2, and reanalysis points to Edna in 1954 being at least a cat 2, probably even a minimum cat 3, thus being our last probable major hit. Though this is not yet official.


The point of the above is it doesn't happen that often, thus I doubt any part of the Maritimes should have a higher risk than say Florida. :roll:
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#51 Postby southerngale » Tue May 16, 2006 5:03 pm

While nobody has to read every post, it is helpful before posting a reply. It seems the same confusion keeps coming up when it's been explained several times in this thread. Just a suggestion.... :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#52 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Tue May 16, 2006 5:31 pm

I do see what you mean. And in both 1869 and 1954 Eastern New England had two possible major landfalls, so it could maybe happen again. However the chances are quite low on average. I doubt anyone can accurately predict where hurricanes will hit before they have even formed yet. That is the holy grail of tropical cyclone forecasting skill after all. I hope to see it accomplished in my lifetime, but I remain skeptical.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#53 Postby Dean4Storms » Tue May 16, 2006 8:02 pm

If you throw enough darts at a particular bullseye (East Coast), sooner or later you can get lucky. JB knows no more about where hurricanes will strike this year than the rest of us!!
0 likes   
My opinion and statements DO NOT represent the opinion of the EMA, NHC, NWS, or any other professional agency, organization, or group. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Jim Cantore

#54 Postby Jim Cantore » Tue May 16, 2006 8:07 pm

statments about the Gulf threat diminishing for August/Sept 05


:roflmao:
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#55 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Tue May 16, 2006 9:54 pm

Dean4Storms wrote:If you throw enough darts at a particular bullseye (East Coast), sooner or later you can get lucky. JB knows no more about where hurricanes will strike this year than the rest of us!!
Being a meteorologist and the accuweather so-called "hurricane-expert", I would have to say that he probably has a better idea of where they may travel than the rest of us.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6372
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

#56 Postby boca » Tue May 16, 2006 10:11 pm

I have to say when JB was streaming his updates they were interesting and entertaining.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hybridstorm_November2001
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2813
Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: SW New Brunswick, Canada
Contact:

#57 Postby Hybridstorm_November2001 » Wed May 17, 2006 10:24 am

Well after seeing what cat 3s, and a couple of cat 2s, did to Florida and the Gulf the past two seasons. I personally hope his predictions for my neck of the woods do not hold true. A TS, or a Remnant low and perhaps even a cat 1 (if weak and fast moving), maybe be interesting, but a full fledged cat 2 or 3 (at landfall) would not be :eek: :eek: :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
terstorm1012
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1314
Age: 43
Joined: Fri Sep 10, 2004 5:36 pm
Location: Millersburg, PA

#58 Postby terstorm1012 » Wed May 17, 2006 10:28 am

The analog for 1954 doesn't seem to be holding up if we use Springtime rainfall in the East as critieria.

The dryness is in the mid-Atlantic states and southward. the Northeast is of course quite wet.

critiques welcome.
0 likes   

User avatar
windycity
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 461
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 6:45 pm
Location: P.B.county,Fl.
Contact:

#59 Postby windycity » Wed May 17, 2006 11:57 am

I hate to say it , but it was j.b. who got katrina right last year, and he predicted her very early on. I think hes made some good calls, so lets all keep open minds on what he has to say. The bottom line?? WE all have to prepare. Prepare as if your life depended on it, because it just might.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#60 Postby skysummit » Wed May 17, 2006 12:02 pm

Sure JB got Katrina right! He's been predicting a New Orleans devastation for years now. He's bound to get it right one year! Same thing goes for New York.
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 69 guests