Tropical Storm Alberto

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#621 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:07 am

floridahurricaneguy wrote:So what seems more likely? Stationary and weakening and dieding or moving west. or going on predicted path with landfall somewhere around Big Bend or down towards Cedar Key?

Matt


I would put my bets on it moving towards the projected path the NHC has and that is just north of Tampa - not as far north as Cedar Key
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#622 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:07 am

All of the above :wink:

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#623 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:07 am

But it depends if the trough moves slowly towards Alberto or quickly towards Alberto.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#624 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:08 am

This is sooooo Arlene 2.0! Could it be a harbinger for things to come?
0 likes   

O Town
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5205
Age: 52
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 9:37 pm
Location: Orlando, Florida 28°35'35"N 81°22'55"W

#625 Postby O Town » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:09 am

CrazyC83 wrote:This is sooooo Arlene 2.0! Could it be a harbinger for things to come?

I know, this is kinda erie to me.
0 likes   

User avatar
28_Storms
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Miami Dade

#626 Postby 28_Storms » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:09 am

NHC held with a Florida hit
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#627 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:09 am

Looks like Alberto is barely moving now based on my sat inspection....
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#628 Postby CHRISTY » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:09 am

floridahurricaneguy wrote:So what seems more likely? Stationary and weakening and dieding or moving west. or going on predicted path with landfall somewhere around Big Bend or down towards Cedar Key?

Matt


my thinking right now is alberto will make lanfall somewere in northernflorida as a minimal tropical storm.
0 likes   

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#629 Postby jasons2k » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:09 am

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
but I thought if it moved west it would be sheared heavily...looking at this map; the shear to the west is light.


That makes no sense.


Actually, I have wondered the same thing that EWG is referring to. It's been stated that if the LLC moves west, it will be moving into increasing shear which will kill any chance for development. However, every shear map I've looked at this AM shows LESS shear to the west - in the path of the LLC. So I'm wondering myself - where is all the shear to the west that's 'supposed' to keep it from developing if the LLC continues to break away?
0 likes   

User avatar
28_Storms
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 137
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Miami Dade

#630 Postby 28_Storms » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:11 am

2006 conditions are nearly identical to 2005 (aside from slightly lower SST's)
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#631 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:11 am

jschlitz wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
but I thought if it moved west it would be sheared heavily...looking at this map; the shear to the west is light.


That makes no sense.


Actually, I have wondered the same thing that EWG is referring to. It's been stated that if the LLC moves west, it will be moving into increasing shear which will kill any chance for development. However, every shear map I've looked at this AM shows LESS shear to the west - in the path of the LLC. So I'm wondering myself - where is all the shear to the west that's 'supposed' to keep it from developing if the LLC continues to break away?


I think the shear is on the way as the trough approaches.....its not there just yet
0 likes   

CHRISTY

#632 Postby CHRISTY » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:11 am

jschlitz wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
but I thought if it moved west it would be sheared heavily...looking at this map; the shear to the west is light.


That makes no sense.


Actually, I have wondered the same thing that EWG is referring to. It's been stated that if the LLC moves west, it will be moving into increasing shear which will kill any chance for development. However, every shear map I've looked at this AM shows LESS shear to the west - in the path of the LLC. So I'm wondering myself - where is all the shear to the west that's 'supposed' to keep it from developing if the LLC continues to break away?


the reason the LLC is breaking away is due maybe do to increaseing shear and the dry air thats chokeing it. ps!remember guys those shear maps we use sometimes are not 100% accurate.
Last edited by CHRISTY on Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#633 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:12 am

O Town wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:This is sooooo Arlene 2.0! Could it be a harbinger for things to come?

I know, this is kinda erie to me.


Yeah - it's not Alberto that is the big worry, but what lies ahead...
0 likes   

User avatar
Audrey2Katrina
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4252
Age: 75
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Metaire, La.

#634 Postby Audrey2Katrina » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:13 am

This is sooooo Arlene 2.0! Could it be a harbinger for things to come?


Doubt it... Arlene WAS a lot like this in its early stages; but it developed a lot better before landfall, and was just under hurricane status when it did... I just can't see this one doing the same.

A2K
0 likes   
Flossy 56 Audrey 57 Hilda 64* Betsy 65* Camille 69* Edith 71 Carmen 74 Bob 79 Danny 85 Elena 85 Juan 85 Florence 88 Andrew 92*, Opal 95, Danny 97, Georges 98*, Isidore 02, Lili 02, Ivan 04, Cindy 05*, Dennis 05, Katrina 05*, Gustav 08*, Isaac 12*, Nate 17, Barry 19, Cristobal 20, Marco, 20, Sally, 20, Zeta 20*, Claudette 21 IDA* 21 Francine *24

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#635 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:15 am

Same with me Alberto is way to sheared aswell.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
jasons2k
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 8245
Age: 51
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 12:32 pm
Location: The Woodlands, TX

#636 Postby jasons2k » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:16 am

boca_chris wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
but I thought if it moved west it would be sheared heavily...looking at this map; the shear to the west is light.


That makes no sense.


Actually, I have wondered the same thing that EWG is referring to. It's been stated that if the LLC moves west, it will be moving into increasing shear which will kill any chance for development. However, every shear map I've looked at this AM shows LESS shear to the west - in the path of the LLC. So I'm wondering myself - where is all the shear to the west that's 'supposed' to keep it from developing if the LLC continues to break away?


I think the shear is on the way as the trough approaches.....its not there just yet


Right, but isn't that why the shear is forecasted to increase in the NE GOM - closer to the trough? The LLC looks like it's trapped in a Low-level steering flow, with the shear ripping away the convection. My concern is that if the LLC continues to the west and misses the trough, shear will relax again. Then what?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22979
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#637 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:21 am

I put my money on squalls continuing to move away from the exposed LLC and a gradual wind-down in the mid Gulf of the LLC. Squalls will hit Florida, but no LLC associated. Here's a McIdas image I just snapped:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/alberto20.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#638 Postby gatorcane » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:21 am

jschlitz wrote:
boca_chris wrote:
jschlitz wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:
but I thought if it moved west it would be sheared heavily...looking at this map; the shear to the west is light.


That makes no sense.


Actually, I have wondered the same thing that EWG is referring to. It's been stated that if the LLC moves west, it will be moving into increasing shear which will kill any chance for development. However, every shear map I've looked at this AM shows LESS shear to the west - in the path of the LLC. So I'm wondering myself - where is all the shear to the west that's 'supposed' to keep it from developing if the LLC continues to break away?


I think the shear is on the way as the trough approaches.....its not there just yet


Right, but isn't that why the shear is forecasted to increase in the NE GOM - closer to the trough? The LLC looks like it's trapped in a Low-level steering flow, with the shear ripping away the convection. My concern is that if the LLC continues to the west and misses the trough, shear will relax again. Then what?


Well its possible - based on my observation of the NW Atlantic water vapor loop - that trough is really not digging down just yet and it may not dig down that far. Now in that case Alberto could escape and then redevelop as it would move WNW with the low level flow. But there is so much dry air I doubt it would amount to much.
0 likes   

User avatar
feederband
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3423
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2003 6:21 pm
Location: Lakeland Fl

#639 Postby feederband » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:22 am

wxman57 wrote:I put my money on squalls continuing to move away from the exposed LLC and a gradual wind-down in the mid Gulf of the LLC. Squalls will hit Florida, but no LLC associated. Here's a McIdas image I just snapped:

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/alberto20.gif


I bet you a quarter it will come close to the NHC track... :lol:
Last edited by feederband on Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4822
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

#640 Postby ronjon » Sun Jun 11, 2006 11:22 am

I put the VIS SAT loop on high speed from this morning and you can see the LLC drifting now slowly to the N-NW. Looks like the NHC track may verify. Also, starting to see increased convection on the northern semi-circle of the LLC and an overall more circular appearance - although its still broad. Some small banding features in the NE quad and TStorms appear to be getting pulled toward the center on the east side. It has a small window (looks like shear has abated somewhat) - maybe 12 hrs - to get slightly stronger. Its trying to mix out the dry air now which is a slow process given how much was (is) in the GOM.

http://hadar.cira.colostate.edu/ramsdis ... at1_0.html
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests