94L Invest (B0C),Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #1

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#281 Postby Stratosphere747 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:00 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:
stormtruth wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Not much to it tonight. Thunderstorms are just about gone and it's moving ashore tomorrow. Just a puff of thunderstorms today. Forget about it. Go take the weekend and 4th of July off and have a great time. Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Nothing for 4-5 weeks? That sounds about as likely as when you said Alberto would dissipate.


Or rather it would move into the BOC and then into Mexico. But, hey lets not be picky. He is allowed to have his own opinion and he is a pro-met so let's respect what he said and move on in the discussion.


Let him respond to the comment I made earlier, and is in no way defending 57, he is a big boy.....

HOWEVER...A SECOND SCENARIO IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY LIKELY...IN WHICH THE DEPRESSION IS SEPARATED FROM ITS DEEP CONVECTION BY THE SOUTHWESTERLY SHEAR...LEAVING A WEAK VORTEX TO LINGER AND DEGENERATE IN THE WESTERN GULF OF MEXICO.

NHC discussion...
0 likes   

User avatar
NONAME
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 373
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Where the Wind Blows

#282 Postby NONAME » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:00 pm

This is when weak disturbances normally lose convection then ramp up before morning and during the day then lose at night again while it is still weak.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23693
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#283 Postby gatorcane » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:01 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:
SouthFloridawx wrote:
stormtruth wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Not much to it tonight. Thunderstorms are just about gone and it's moving ashore tomorrow. Just a puff of thunderstorms today. Forget about it. Go take the weekend and 4th of July off and have a great time. Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Nothing for 4-5 weeks? That sounds about as likely as when you said Alberto would dissipate.


Or rather it would move into the BOC and then into Mexico. But, hey lets not be picky. He is allowed to have his own opinion and he is a pro-met so let's respect what he said and move on in the discussion.


Let him respond to the comment I made earlier, and is in no way defending 57, he is a big boy.....

HOWEVER...A SECOND SCENARIO IS BECOMING INCREASINGLY LIKELY...IN WHICH THE DEPRESSION IS SEPARATED FROM ITS DEEP CONVECTION BY THE SOUTHWESTERLY SHEAR...LEAVING A WEAK VORTEX TO LINGER AND DEGENERATE IN THE WESTERN GULF OF MEXICO.

NHC discussion...


WxMan57 is a pro met in my book not a big boy :wink:
0 likes   

User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 62
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

#284 Postby Aquawind » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:03 pm

Whatch your tone Stratosphere747.. No need to get lippy.. Check your PM!
0 likes   

Stratosphere747
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3772
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
Contact:

#285 Postby Stratosphere747 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:08 pm

Maybe I should clarify, even though this is getting way off-topic...In regards to Alberto.

The NHC within their discussions the following morning of some of what the pro-mets here felt, verified what they were seeing..

The comment refrence was to "stormtruth" who seems to be calling him out....

57 does not need me to defend him....;)
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#286 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:09 pm

Looks like a nice twist may be forming on the SW side of 94L:

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-ir2.html
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#287 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:12 pm

skysummit wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Geez....I wouldn't exactly take it "that" far. A whole month or over with no development, heh?


As I looked back on the last 100 or so years, in half the seasons the first storm formed in August. So it's not that rare to go through June/July without a named storm. It almost seems as though some of you actually want a storm to develop out there. I'd be perfectly happy if the season ended with Alberto.
0 likes   

Opal storm

#288 Postby Opal storm » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:17 pm

wxman57 wrote:
skysummit wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Geez....I wouldn't exactly take it "that" far. A whole month or over with no development, heh?


As I looked back on the last 100 or so years, in half the seasons the first storm formed in August. So it's not that rare to go through June/July without a named storm.
Our first storm of the season formed this month,not August. :wink: So I wouldn't put too much faith in climo,especially considering the amount of tropical disturbances we've had lately.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#289 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:20 pm

I looked at the loop and I don't see a circulation.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#290 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:21 pm

Opal storm wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
skysummit wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Geez....I wouldn't exactly take it "that" far. A whole month or over with no development, heh?


As I looked back on the last 100 or so years, in half the seasons the first storm formed in August. So it's not that rare to go through June/July without a named storm.
Our first storm of the season formed this month,not August. :wink: So I wouldn't put too much faith in climo,especially considering the amount of tropical disturbances we've had lately.
I'd agree with you there Opal storm. After the last two years I wouldn't bet on anything "typical" this season.
0 likes   

Scorpion

#291 Postby Scorpion » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:21 pm

I see some signs of banding, no?
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#292 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:22 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I looked at the loop and I don't see a circulation.
Yeah, it is tough to tell. There may not be a distinct one right now, just trying to point it out to see what others would say.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#293 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:22 pm

Scorpion wrote:I see some signs of banding, no?
who said anything about banding?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#294 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:23 pm

Opal storm wrote:
wxman57 wrote:
skysummit wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Geez....I wouldn't exactly take it "that" far. A whole month or over with no development, heh?


As I looked back on the last 100 or so years, in half the seasons the first storm formed in August. So it's not that rare to go through June/July without a named storm.
Our first storm of the season formed this month,not August. :wink: So I wouldn't put too much faith in climo,especially considering the amount of tropical disturbances we've had lately.


There is typically a small peak in activity the 2nd-3rd week of June, followed by a sharp lull in late June through much of July. I'm not sure why that is, but I can see it in every study I've done. Conditions across the tropics are definitely much less favorable for development than they were this time last year.

Typically, about 10 to 15% of all tropical waves develop. But that percentage is spread out across the whole season. The chances are much greater during August-September and much less than 10-15% in June/July and Oct-Nov. So maybe 1 in 15 or 20 waves, on average, might be expected to develop this time of year.

Last season I counted about 55-58 significant tropical waves coming off the coast of Africa (66 total disturbances including the waves and other non-wave features). About 45% of those developed, though. That's quite a high percentage (and we started counting the 3rd week of May). So far this season, we're right about tied with 2005 for the number of waves for late June, but they're much farther south and weaker than in 2005.
0 likes   

User avatar
skysummit
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5305
Age: 49
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 11:09 pm
Location: Ponchatoula, LA
Contact:

#295 Postby skysummit » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:23 pm

RAMSDIS has Floater #2 over the Invest.
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
0 likes   

Scorpion

#296 Postby Scorpion » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:24 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Scorpion wrote:I see some signs of banding, no?
who said anything about banding?


I guess I'm out of my mind :(
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 68
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#297 Postby wxman57 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:25 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I looked at the loop and I don't see a circulation.
Yeah, it is tough to tell. There may not be a distinct one right now, just trying to point it out to see what others would say.


I actually see what you're looking at, Extremeweatherguy. I do see a mid-level spin on the coast of Mexico. It's visible now because the thunderstorms died out. But it's definitely aloft. You can't see the low clouds too well at night and surface obs indicate pressures are pretty high.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#298 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:25 pm

skysummit wrote:RAMSDIS has Floater #2 over the Invest.
http://www.cira.colostate.edu/ramm/rmsd ... PICAL.html
finally!
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#299 Postby stormtruth » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:26 pm

wxman57 wrote:
skysummit wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Might not see any development for another 4-5 weeks. Just a typical June/July pattern.


Geez....I wouldn't exactly take it "that" far. A whole month or over with no development, heh?


As I looked back on the last 100 or so years, in half the seasons the first storm formed in August. So it's not that rare to go through June/July without a named storm. It almost seems as though some of you actually want a storm to develop out there. I'd be perfectly happy if the season ended with Alberto.


Shouldn't you at least look more closely at the last five or ten years for recent trends? Even some experts who don't think global warming has an impact still believe we are in a cycle of increased activity.
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#300 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:28 pm

Anyway, Global Warming also melts the ice caps which adds more cold water to the tropics which would make the water slightly cooler.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 40 guests