


Moderator: S2k Moderators
Yankeegirl wrote:I just noticed that too!! you beat me to it!!
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/east/gmex/loop-vis.html
Extremeweatherguy wrote:I don't see that. Instead I see the shear maps showing a decrease, the satellites showing a blow up in convection, and other pro mets saying it has a chance. I don't see how this is -removed-. I see this more as concern. If something does develop I want to know about it as soon as possible so I can be prepared if it heads my way, but I am in no way wishing it here.wxman57 wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:
WXman57 you remind me of a guy named FranK that used to be here..he used to kill any kind of development(not saying this will develop) and one day Katrina formed after he said no way...an I have not seen him since..LOL
What I see on this forum are a lot of people who just cannot wait for that next storm. They want to believe that any puff of clouds in the tropics will be the next big hurricane. One might call that, well, that's considered a "bad word" here.
Oh, I was there once years ago when I was a kid. I wanted the next storm to develop so badly that I could taste it. Shear? What shear? Surely the shear will weaken! I need a storm now! But I'm in a position now that requires me to brief people who are making decisions that could cost them over a BILLION dollars! So I have to be very careful what I say about potential development in the tropics.
Believe me, when I see something that really looks like a threat to develop I'll be all over it here. If I'm bullish on development, you'd better pay attention.
I agree with what you said. Looks like some much needed rain for S. Texas, only draw back is it could cause some flooding.vbhoutex wrote:Looking at the visible, there is still plenty of shear just to the North of the system and even more further North across the NW GOM. there will have to be quite a bit of relaxation of this shear for anything to start. Even though it is always a possibility that a TD or TS could develop in these conditions, what I am seeing ATM is a very wet weekend for much of S TX(entire coast) and SC TX without any TC development. It may be close, but it definitely has a ways to go before I would start to worry about more than a VERY WET WEEKEND with the probability of some flooding rains for some areas once again.
Roxy wrote:LarryWx wrote:DESTRUCTION5 wrote:WXman57 you remind me of a guy named FranK that used to be here..he used to kill any kind of development(not saying this will develop) and one day Katrina formed after he said no way...an I have not seen him since..LOL
I thought Frank, who's posts I had liked a lot at first, had become too much biased toward no development. However, I absolutely do not put Wxman57 in that category. I consider him to be a fantastic poster (extremely knowledgeable, very clear communicator/writer, and OBJECTIVE). Quite simply, I consider him to be one of the best posters here. Since my time is limited and I often don't have enough time to read all the posts in a big thread, I'll sometimes skip right to his posts to get ASAP what I feel is the "real story". If he were to ever stop posting here, I'd consider it a huge blow to this BB. There aren't too many posters here for whom I'd say this. There are a good number of very good posters, but he is one of relatively few here I'd call outstanding. This BB is very fortunate to have him post here.
I concur 100%. Plus he's from my area, so I trust his oppinion.
vbhoutex wrote:Looking at the visible, there is still plenty of shear just to the North of the system and even more further North across the NW GOM. there will have to be quite a bit of relaxation of this shear for anything to start. Even though it is always a possibility that a TD or TS could develop in these conditions, what I am seeing ATM is a very wet weekend for much of S TX(entire coast) and SC TX without any TC development. It may be close, but it definitely has a ways to go before I would start to worry about more than a VERY WET WEEKEND with the probability of some flooding rains for some areas once again.