94L Invest Comments Thread #2

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
Matt-hurricanewatcher

#281 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:52 pm

Why waste the recon? I see no LLC just a surface trough at 96 west. With northwestly flow at all levels up to 300 millibars. Which should soak texas. Maybe weak spin just off the texas coast/may another at 23/93. But this is no way close to becoming anything. Could it tighten as it moving at land sure(Not in my discussion)but always possible. But I say the chances for development are low if not none. Even with the Anticyclone.
0 likes   

User avatar
NONAME
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 373
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 8:15 am
Location: Where the Wind Blows

#282 Postby NONAME » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:58 pm

Remeber Matt they can cancel the recon if it look like nothing.
0 likes   

bigmoney755

#283 Postby bigmoney755 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:59 pm

Matt-hurricanewatcher wrote:Why waste the recon?
Because they can
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#284 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:01 pm

pressures in Victoria, TX have dropped 1mb in the last 2 hours, and the same has happened in Corpus Christi.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8346
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

#285 Postby SouthFloridawx » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:03 pm

...DISCUSSION...
THE GULF OF MEXICO...
SCATTERED STRONG SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS IN THE WESTERN GULF
WATERS FROM 23N TO 28N BETWEEN 92W AND 97W. THIS PRECIPITATION
IS IN THE VICINITY OF A WESTERN GULF OF MEXICO SURFACE TROUGH
WHICH STRETCHES FROM INTERIOR MEXICO JUST EAST OF THE ISTHMUS
OF TEHUANTEPEC TO THE LOWER TEXAS COAST. OTHER SHOWERS AND
THUNDERSTORMS ALSO ARE NORTH OF 22N WEST OF 88W. THIS WHOLE
MASS OF CLOUDINESS AND PRECIPITATION IS FOUND TO THE SOUTHEAST
OF A MIDDLE TO UPPER LEVEL LOW CENTER IN WEST TEXAS NEAR 31N101W.
WIDELY SCATTERED MODERATE SHOWERS TO ISOLATED STRONG
THUNDERSTORMS ARE OVER THE GULF WATERS EAST OF 88W...AND OVER
FLORIDA FROM THE FLORIDA KEYS TO THE EASTERN ATLANTIC OCEAN NEAR
30N80W. THIS PRECIPITATION IS RELATED TO SURFACE EASTERLY WIND
FLOW AND A GULF OF MEXICO SURFACE TROUGH FROM THE SOUTHEASTERN
GULF WATERS NEAR 23N84W TO THE FLORIDA WEST COAST NEAR FORT MYERS
TO THE MELBOURNE FLORIDA AREA ON THE FLORIDA EAST COAST. SOME OF
THE SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS NEAR FLORIDA ARE WEST OF A LINE
FROM 30N75W TO THE NORTHERN BAHAMAS. BROAD UPPER LEVEL
ANTICYCLONIC FLOW COVERS THE OPEN GULF WATERS. THIS ANTICYCLONIC
FLOW MAY NOT BE RELATED DIRECTLY TO THE EASTERN PACIFIC UPPER
LEVEL HIGH CENTER...ABOUT 175 NM SOUTH OF THE GULF OF
TEHUANTEPEC. A MIDDLE TO UPPER LEVEL TROUGH CONNECTS ONE LOW
CENTER...ALONG THE PACIFIC OCEAN SIDE OF BAJA CALIFORNIA NEAR
28N...TO A SECOND LOW CENTER NEAR 20N108W...TO 11N102W. MIDDLE
TO UPPER LEVEL CYCLONIC FLOW COVERS INTERIOR MEXICO SOUTH OF 26N
WEST OF 100W.
0 likes   

User avatar
Pearl River
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 825
Age: 66
Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: SELa

#286 Postby Pearl River » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:03 pm

EWG wrote

that makes no sense though? How can it be set for tomorrow when it is expected to come inland tonight or tomorrow morning.


Because the NHC say's so.

000
NOUS42 KNHC 021700 COR
WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, TPC/NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1300 AM EDT SUN 02 JUL 2006
SUBJECT: TROPICAL STORM PLAN OF THE DAY (TSPOD)
VALID 03/1100Z TO 04/1100Z JUL 2006
TSPOD NUMBER.....06-032

I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
1. SUSPECT AREA
FLIGHT ONE FLIGHT TWO
A. 03/1800Z A. 04/0600, 1200Z
B. AFXXX 01DDA INVEST B. AFXXX 0202A CYCLONE
C. 03/1500Z C. 04/0300Z
D. 26.0N 96.0W D. 28.5N 96.0W
E. 03/1700Z TO 2300Z E. 04/0530Z TO 1230Z
F. SFC TO 10000 FT F. SFC TO 10000 FT

2. OUTLOOK FOR SUCCEEDING DAY: NEGATIVE AS SYSTEM
WILL MOVE INLAND.
0 likes   

kjun
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 5:33 pm

Moisture Flowing

#287 Postby kjun » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:05 pm

In from all directions; the GOM, Pacific, and from the Yuc. wave. Even if this system does not develop, it may give Texas and LA a HUGE soaking!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 23021
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

#288 Postby wxman57 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:07 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:that makes no sense though? How can it be set for tomorrow when it is expected to come inland tonight or tomorrow morning.


I don't think that recon is going out tomorrow. There's no mention of recon in the latest outlook. Just because a possible recon mission is listed in the Plan Of the Day, doesn't mean it's actually going to fly. As always, "if necessary". It probably won't be necessary. Certainly, there's nothing to fly into today.

Pressures across the NW Gulf are 1018-1021 mb, as evident by the latest surface analysis. Certainly no low center out there, just thunderstorms.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/94L.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#289 Postby stormtruth » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:10 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:The guy on TWC just said a gravity wave was affecting parts of LA and was about to interfere with the system in the Gulf. What does that mean?


It could mean LA is experiencing a disturbance in the space-time continuum.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#290 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:10 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:pressures in Victoria, TX have dropped 1mb in the last 2 hours, and the same has happened in Corpus Christi.


Which is about what you would expect this time of day due to dirunal changes. Remember...between 10 am - 4pm you get a dirunal FALL in pressures of up to 3 mbs.

So...in other words...the pressure is actually steady taking diurnal changes into account.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#291 Postby Air Force Met » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:23 pm

Air Force Met wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:pressures in Victoria, TX have dropped 1mb in the last 2 hours, and the same has happened in Corpus Christi.


Which is about what you would expect this time of day due to dirunal changes. Remember...between 10 am - 4pm you get a dirunal FALL in pressures of up to 3 mbs.

So...in other words...the pressure is actually steady taking diurnal changes into account.


Here is an example of this...a big dirunal curve at my station at Ellington...

http://www.wunderground.com/weatherstation/WXDailyHistory.asp?ID=KTXHOUST59&month=6&day=25&year=2006

You get big swings on hot...sunny days like the example here (which was a 4mb diurnal drop)...and smaller 1 to 2 mb swings on cluody days like today.
0 likes   

spinfan4eva
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:27 am
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Contact:

#292 Postby spinfan4eva » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:28 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:that makes no sense though? How can it be set for tomorrow when it is expected to come inland tonight or tomorrow morning.


ALTHOUGH UPPER-LEVEL WINDS ARE CURRENTLY NOT FAVORABLE
FOR TROPICAL CYCLONE DEVELOPMENT...THESE WINDS COULD BECOME
SOMEWHAT MORE FAVORABLE OVER THE NEXT DAY OR SO WHILE THE SURFACE
TROUGH LINGERS IN THE WESTERN GULF
.
0 likes   

User avatar
TS Zack
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Louisiana
Contact:

#293 Postby TS Zack » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:28 pm

A gravity wave is a sort of outflow in the upper atmosphere. It will enhance convection.
0 likes   

User avatar
Lindaloo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 22658
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:06 am
Location: Pascagoula, MS

#294 Postby Lindaloo » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:30 pm

Extreme... please rely on the facts of the NHC. They are the experts. If you do not agree with their thinking then please, fill us in on your analysis as to why you think they are wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#295 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:32 pm

wxman57 wrote:
Extremeweatherguy wrote:that makes no sense though? How can it be set for tomorrow when it is expected to come inland tonight or tomorrow morning.


I don't think that recon is going out tomorrow. There's no mention of recon in the latest outlook. Just because a possible recon mission is listed in the Plan Of the Day, doesn't mean it's actually going to fly. As always, "if necessary". It probably won't be necessary. Certainly, there's nothing to fly into today.

Pressures across the NW Gulf are 1018-1021 mb, as evident by the latest surface analysis. Certainly no low center out there, just thunderstorms.

http://myweb.cableone.net/nolasue/94L.gif


I don't think when they issued the outlook, they had a recon scheduled to go out there yet. The schedule came out a few hours after the TWO was issued. Also from reading the TWO I think they believe they surface trough itself will remain out in the NW Gulf for the next day or two. The thunderstorms in the NE Gulf will probably move inland ahead of it later tonight without developing much further. New convection will have to form tomorrow morning for this sytem to have a chance to develop.
0 likes   

Derek Ortt

#296 Postby Derek Ortt » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:38 pm

thet wo was after the plan of the day. POD was written before 1500 UTC
0 likes   

User avatar
Thunder44
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5922
Age: 44
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 7:53 pm
Location: New York City

#297 Postby Thunder44 » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:44 pm

Derek Ortt wrote:thet wo was after the plan of the day. POD was written before 1500 UTC


How can you tell? It says "13:00am" I just assumed they meant 1300 military time or 1pm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extremeweatherguy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 11095
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
Location: Florida

#298 Postby Extremeweatherguy » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:46 pm

Lindaloo wrote:Extreme... please rely on the facts of the NHC. They are the experts. If you do not agree with their thinking then please, fill us in on your analysis as to why you think they are wrong.
I never disagreed with them. All I asked was why they are going out tomorrow if the system we are watching is suppose to be inland by then. Just curious.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29114
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

#299 Postby vbhoutex » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:51 pm

Extremeweatherguy wrote:
Lindaloo wrote:Extreme... please rely on the facts of the NHC. They are the experts. If you do not agree with their thinking then please, fill us in on your analysis as to why you think they are wrong.
I never disagreed with them. All I asked was why they are going out tomorrow if the system we are watching is suppose to be inland by then. Just curious.


See wxman57's response re: the plan of the day above. All missions are "if necessary".
0 likes   

User avatar
Houstonia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 829
Age: 60
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.

Re: Moisture Flowing

#300 Postby Houstonia » Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:53 pm

kjun wrote:In from all directions; the GOM, Pacific, and from the Yuc. wave. Even if this system does not develop, it may give Texas and LA a HUGE soaking!!!


Well, I'm in Texas and I'm receiving a HUGE soaking right now. Complex is ankle deep in water right now. (not inside - we don't flood here).

I regret now not having complained louder and longer about the leak in my living room ceiling. :roll:
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Shawee and 41 guests