
gives you chills
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Forum rules
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2003 8:34 pm
- Location: Surfside Beach/Freeport Tx
- Contact:
- Extremeweatherguy
- Category 5
- Posts: 11095
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:13 pm
- Location: Florida
yeah, I guess the statements put out by government officials are just complete lies.
Also, I remember a thread awhile back when somebody trained in this subject said that it would take something like 12 hours of 160-200mph winds. If a slow moving Cat. 5 were moving ashore and sat over an area with 160mph+ gusts for a long duration; it would be very possible.

Also, I remember a thread awhile back when somebody trained in this subject said that it would take something like 12 hours of 160-200mph winds. If a slow moving Cat. 5 were moving ashore and sat over an area with 160mph+ gusts for a long duration; it would be very possible.
0 likes
Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, I guess the statements put out by government officials are just complete lies.![]()
Also, I remember a thread awhile back when somebody trained in this subject said that it would take something like 12 hours of 160-200mph winds. If a slow moving Cat. 5 were moving ashore and sat over an area with 160mph+ gusts for a long duration; it would be very possible.
Fair enough.
Give me a plausible scenario where a cat5 can sit over a major metropilitan area for 12 hours without:
1) weakening
2) winds decreasing due to land friction
I dont see any reason a skyscraper will fall in a hurricane.
0 likes
Heres another one, not exactly chilling but possibly a sign to come voer the next 50 years if the seas keep warming like they are:
THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS NO TROPICAL CYCLONE EVER MAKING LANDFALL ON THE IBERIAN PENINSULA. BASED ON SURFACE REPORTS FROM FARO PORTUGAL...THE CENTER PASSED JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE COAST OF
PORTUGAL...BEFORE BECOMING THE FIRST TROPICAL CYCLONE TO MAKE
LANDFALL IN SPAIN.
THE HISTORICAL RECORD SHOWS NO TROPICAL CYCLONE EVER MAKING LANDFALL ON THE IBERIAN PENINSULA. BASED ON SURFACE REPORTS FROM FARO PORTUGAL...THE CENTER PASSED JUST TO THE SOUTH OF THE COAST OF
PORTUGAL...BEFORE BECOMING THE FIRST TROPICAL CYCLONE TO MAKE
LANDFALL IN SPAIN.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Normandy wrote:Here we go again with the argument of skyscraper collapse.
People seriously underestimate the strength of skyscrapers.
"I don't really think we need to worry about them collapsing."
-unidentified ABC reporter, September 11, 2001
But it's been generally accepted for a long time that a Cat 5 COULD bring down SOME high rise buildings. Plus, what happens if no warning is given and a 40 story building collapses? Additionally, some could have design flaws that were unknown prior to the storm.
0 likes
Normandy wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, I guess the statements put out by government officials are just complete lies.![]()
Also, I remember a thread awhile back when somebody trained in this subject said that it would take something like 12 hours of 160-200mph winds. If a slow moving Cat. 5 were moving ashore and sat over an area with 160mph+ gusts for a long duration; it would be very possible.
Fair enough.
Give me a plausible scenario where a cat5 can sit over a major metropilitan area for 12 hours without:
1) weakening
2) winds decreasing due to land friction
I dont see any reason a skyscraper will fall in a hurricane.
A Category 4 running into a blocking force just off New York City slowly weakening. Skyscrapers would experience Category 5 for a long time. Doesn't need to be 12 hours.
0 likes
- GulfBreezer
- Category 5
- Posts: 2230
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 8:58 pm
- Location: Gulf Breeze Fl
- Contact:
SunnyThoughts wrote:Doc Joe... I remember those chills too. Im also in Santa Rosa county (Pace) I was watching all through the night from a hotel room in Troy Alabama. Was afraid I would have nothing to come home to. Luckily everything made it through ok, other than the huge oak tree in the back yard. Hopefully everyone will have a safe season this year...holding up sign *GULF IS CLOSED FOR BUSINESS*
Sunny.....it does seem like just yesterday we were all in the chat room for Dennis AND Ivan (the year before)........Doc, I am in Gulf Breeze and lost everything I owned to Ivan but was extremely grateful that Dennis has his forward speed, b/c if he had come through as slowly as Ivan, it would have been so much worse. We are still rebuilding here from the 2004 season and as Sunny said.......THE GOM IS CLOSED FOR ANY TROPICAL ACTIVITY!!
0 likes
- docjoe
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 262
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 10:42 pm
- Location: SE Alabama..formerly the land of ivan and dennis
Sunny.....it does seem like just yesterday we were all in the chat room for Dennis AND Ivan (the year before)........Doc, I am in Gulf Breeze and lost everything I owned to Ivan but was extremely grateful that Dennis has his forward speed, b/c if he had come through as slowly as Ivan, it would have been so much worse. We are still rebuilding here from the 2004 season and as Sunny said.......THE GOM IS CLOSED FOR ANY TROPICAL ACTIVITY!![/quote]
Very sorry for your losses from Ivan. Hard to believe it was almost 2 years ago. Fortunately in Milton we did not have significant flooding issues for the most part...Blackwater River and Ward Basin being exceptions. As far as Dennis I agree. If Dennis had lasted just 3 or 4 hours a large part of Santa Rosa county would have been levelled...at least more than already was. As bad as Ivan was here I personally do not believe Ivan's winds approached the velocity of that from Dennis for the short time we were in the eyewall.
docjoe
Very sorry for your losses from Ivan. Hard to believe it was almost 2 years ago. Fortunately in Milton we did not have significant flooding issues for the most part...Blackwater River and Ward Basin being exceptions. As far as Dennis I agree. If Dennis had lasted just 3 or 4 hours a large part of Santa Rosa county would have been levelled...at least more than already was. As bad as Ivan was here I personally do not believe Ivan's winds approached the velocity of that from Dennis for the short time we were in the eyewall.
docjoe
Last edited by docjoe on Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 4439
- Age: 31
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
- Location: College Station, TX
Cyclenall wrote:I have a question, is there still damage from Hurricane Andrew?
Probably. In my opinion any Major Hurricane that makes landfall in a certain area will scar that area for life.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Regit wrote:Normandy wrote:Here we go again with the argument of skyscraper collapse.
People seriously underestimate the strength of skyscrapers.
"I don't really think we need to worry about them collapsing."
-unidentified ABC reporter, September 11, 2001
But it's been generally accepted for a long time that a Cat 5 COULD bring down SOME high rise buildings. Plus, what happens if no warning is given and a 40 story building collapses? Additionally, some could have design flaws that were unknown prior to the storm.
LOL.
Thats a great example to use.
Cant compare 9/11 with a hurricane.
0 likes
- StrongWind
- Tropical Storm
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 5:02 pm
- Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Normandy wrote:Extremeweatherguy wrote:yeah, I guess the statements put out by government officials are just complete lies.![]()
Also, I remember a thread awhile back when somebody trained in this subject said that it would take something like 12 hours of 160-200mph winds. If a slow moving Cat. 5 were moving ashore and sat over an area with 160mph+ gusts for a long duration; it would be very possible.
Fair enough.
Give me a plausible scenario where a cat5 can sit over a major metropilitan area for 12 hours without:
1) weakening
2) winds decreasing due to land friction
I dont see any reason a skyscraper will fall in a hurricane.
Andrew blew out chunks of (reinforced)concrete from large buildings. And at least one large hotel lost a wall. If Andrew hadn't been such a fast moving storm, things could have been even worse.
While skyscrapers may not collapse completely - I bet some would be reduced to nothing more than a shell of structual compenets so badly warped they would have to be demolished anyway.
SW
0 likes
- weathermom
- Category 2
- Posts: 760
- Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:59 pm
- Location: North Jersey
KATRINA IS EXPECTED TO MAKE LANDFALL AT EITHER CATEGORY FOUR OR FIVE INTENSITY.
COASTAL STORM SURGE FLOODING OF 18 TO 22 FEET ABOVE NORMAL TIDE LEVELS...LOCALLY AS HIGH AS 28 FEET ALONG WITH LARGE AND DANGEROUS BATTERING WAVES...CAN BE EXPECTED NEAR AND TO THE EAST OF WHERE THE CENTER MAKES LANDFALL
going back a bit further
...CHARLEY STRENGTHENS TO CATEGORY FOUR HURRICANE AND HEADS FOR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COAST...
...SEVERE HURRICANE FLOYD POUNDING THE BAHAMAS...EYE EXPECTED TO PASS NEAR OR OVER THE ABACOS IN A FEW HOURS...HEADING TOWARD EAST COAST OF FLORIDA...
EYE OF CATEGORY FIVE HURRICANE MITCH MOVING OVER SWAN ISLAND...
...LARGE AND DANGEROUS HURRICANE IVAN MOVING NORTHWARD TOWARD THE GULF COAST...
PINAR DEL RIO REPORTED SUSTAINED WINDS OF 124 MPH WITH
GUSTS TO 162 MPH.
COASTAL STORM SURGE FLOODING OF 18 TO 22 FEET ABOVE NORMAL TIDE LEVELS...LOCALLY AS HIGH AS 28 FEET ALONG WITH LARGE AND DANGEROUS BATTERING WAVES...CAN BE EXPECTED NEAR AND TO THE EAST OF WHERE THE CENTER MAKES LANDFALL
going back a bit further
...CHARLEY STRENGTHENS TO CATEGORY FOUR HURRICANE AND HEADS FOR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COAST...
...SEVERE HURRICANE FLOYD POUNDING THE BAHAMAS...EYE EXPECTED TO PASS NEAR OR OVER THE ABACOS IN A FEW HOURS...HEADING TOWARD EAST COAST OF FLORIDA...
EYE OF CATEGORY FIVE HURRICANE MITCH MOVING OVER SWAN ISLAND...
...LARGE AND DANGEROUS HURRICANE IVAN MOVING NORTHWARD TOWARD THE GULF COAST...
PINAR DEL RIO REPORTED SUSTAINED WINDS OF 124 MPH WITH
GUSTS TO 162 MPH.
0 likes
Remember that skyscrapers experience winds much higher than the 10 meter wind in the advisories. So if its a mid Cat 4 the middle and tops of a skyscraper would be experiencing sustained winds of 190 mph. If its a landfalling Cat 5 then the sustained winds would be perhaps upwards of 220 mph.
0 likes
- gtalum
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4749
- Age: 49
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 3:48 pm
- Location: Bradenton, FL
- Contact:
Cyclenall wrote: Then can you explain why it was stated in the Urgent weather message?
Because meteorologists are not civil engineers.
As mentioned just above me, skyscrapers are extremely strong. The outer curtain walls can certainly be completely blown off the buildings, but the steel core structures will stand up to anything a storm can throw at them.
0 likes
gtalum wrote:Cyclenall wrote: Then can you explain why it was stated in the Urgent weather message?
Because meteorologists are not civil engineers.
As mentioned just above me, skyscrapers are extremely strong. The outer curtain walls can certainly be completely blown off the buildings, but the steel core structures will stand up to anything a storm can throw at them.
Meteorologists don't have to be civil engineers to determine if the buildings can withstand a certain hurricane. They would make sure they aren't posting false information before writing it out.
0 likes
- beachbum_al
- Category 5
- Posts: 2163
- Age: 55
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 9:23 pm
- Location: South Alabama Coast
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Beef Stew and 40 guests