#7 Postby caneflyer » Sun Jul 09, 2006 6:36 pm
A web search reveals the following from an article by Franklin in Natural Hazards Review. Basically, the one-minute averaging is a holdover from the old fastest mile concept:
The use of the highest 1-minute average wind to define a hurricane therefore is the NWS standard, not simply an NHC standard as Sparks asserts. The earliest published use by the NHC in the formal literature was in the season summary article describing the 1980 hurricane season (Lawrence and Pelissier 1981). The term "sustained wind" appears in earlier NHC articles, but prior to 1980 (e.g., Simpson and Hope 1972) the term appears to be have been used interchangeably with the "fastest mile wind" (the reciprocal of the shortest interval that it takes one mile of air to pass a given point). The fastest mile was commonly reported by land-based stations with multiple-register anemometers, especially prior to 1980. As technology changed, it became customary to report winds averaged over various periods of time, rather than over distances, and the "fastest mile" is no longer reported by U.S. observing stations. As the sustained wind concept evolved from a distance-based mean to a time-mean, a one-minute averaging period was chosen by the NHC because it represents averaging similar to the fastest mile for tropical cyclone wind speeds. (The equivalence, of course, is exact at 60 mph. The fastest mile speed equivalent for Sparks' preferred standard of a 10-min average would be 6 mph, a speed of little interest to NHC).
0 likes