It is because it anit going to happencycloneye wrote:The 12z UKMET doesn't show anything.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... hour=144hr

Moderator: S2k Moderators
It is because it anit going to happencycloneye wrote:The 12z UKMET doesn't show anything.
http://moe.met.fsu.edu/cgi-bin/ukmtc2.c ... hour=144hr
I'm starting to think this doe's not have much of a chance. But theres still a chance...SAL is a big problem for this system...
Lattest discussion...
http://www.storm2k.org/phpbb2/viewtopic ... 3&start=60
cycloneye wrote:http://tcweb.fnmoc.navy.mil/tc-bin/tc_home.cgi
NRL has the latest position of 96L at 18:00z at 8.6n-41.7w with 1010 mbs.
bvigal wrote:cycloneye wrote:http://tcweb.fnmoc.navy.mil/tc-bin/tc_home.cgi
NRL has the latest position of 96L at 18:00z at 8.6n-41.7w with 1010 mbs.
So Luis, do you think the NHC is in agreement that there is a surface low pressure along this wave? And has it dropped from 1012 to 1010 so far today?
(Note: lest anyone misunderstand, not talking about a CLOSED low.)
cycloneye wrote:ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/pub/atcf/tcweb/invest_al962006.invest
Above is the text for invest 96L.They haved been following it since it was at 33w as you can see.
bvigal wrote:cycloneye wrote:ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/pub/atcf/tcweb/invest_al962006.invest
Above is the text for invest 96L.They haved been following it since it was at 33w as you can see.
Thanks Luis! That sort of answers my question. They considered a 1013mb low to be along the wave at 6z, but none at 12z or 18z. Or, IS that what that means??
Users browsing this forum: BobHarlem, cajungal, Cpv17, hurricane2025, MarioProtVI, Stratton23, Teban54 and 40 guests