Tropical Storm Beryl

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#561 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:49 pm

well thats hard to dispute .....AJC3... except every plot i get there is just more westerly motion then 350... cant figure it out .. my plots are correct using GRlevel 3 i have used it numerous times and have been very acurate and am almost always in line with the NHC why this time its continues to be so different i dont know maybe you can figure it out
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#562 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:51 pm

Not here to defend anyone...just stating what I see...I must say that looking at the Night-time Visible, it does appear to be heading more towards the NW than the N, you can also see this on the radar out of Morehead City, NC NWS...
0 likes   

User avatar
benny
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 593
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 8:09 am
Location: Miami

#563 Postby benny » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:52 pm

the 00z gfs brings whatever of left of this system over the ne usa in about 36-48 hours...!!!
0 likes   

User avatar
stormtruth
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2006 4:15 pm

#564 Postby stormtruth » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:52 pm

brunota2003 wrote:Not here to defend anyone...just stating what I see...I must say that looking at the Night-time Visible, it does appear to be heading more towards the NW than the N, you can also see this on the radar out of Morehead City, NC NWS...


I agree. It looks like it has seperated from the bulk of the convection and headed NW with a little new convection developing on the NW side.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#565 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:53 pm

I agree stormvoider but thats not very accurate.. and i can do that and i do see what your saying .. radar is different.. im doing something worng .. im missing something

i do a number of different techniques that have always worked well but for some reason now its not trying find my error...
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#566 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:54 pm

by the way AJC3 did you get my PM
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

#567 Postby brunota2003 » Tue Jul 18, 2006 11:56 pm

stormtruth wrote:
brunota2003 wrote:Not here to defend anyone...just stating what I see...I must say that looking at the Night-time Visible, it does appear to be heading more towards the NW than the N, you can also see this on the radar out of Morehead City, NC NWS...


I agree. It looks like it has seperated from the bulk of the convection and headed NW with a little new convection developing on the NW side.

And so you guys know what I used: http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t1/loop-vis.html Of course that is just IMO as to what I see...and as stormtruth mentioned, you can see a little blow-up of convection around the NW side...now its late and I'm going to bed...night everyone!!!
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#568 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:03 am

Conditions at 41001 as of
(11:50 pm EDT on 07/18/2006)
0350 GMT on 07/19/2006: Unit of Measure: EnglishMetric Time Zone: Station Local TimeGreenwich Mean Time [GMT]British Summer Time [GMT+1]Eastern Greenland [GMT-1]Azores [GMT-2]Western Greenland [GMT-3]Atlantic Standard [GMT-4]US/Eastern StandardUS/Central StandardUS/Mountain StandardUS/Pacific StandardAlaska Standard [GMT-9]Hawaii-Aleutian Standard [GMT-10]Samoa Standard [GMT-11]International Date Line West [GMT-12]Western European [GMT+0]Central European [GMT+1]Eastern European [GMT+2]Moscow [GMT+3]USSR Zone 3 [GMT+4]USSR Zone 4 [GMT+5]USSR Zone 5 [GMT+6]USSR Zone 6 [GMT+7]China Coast [GMT+8]Japan Standard [GMT+9]Guam Standard [GMT+10]GMT+11International Date Line East [GMT+12]
Click on the graph icon in the table below to see a time series plot of the last five days of that observation.

Wind Direction (WDIR): SE ( 130 deg true )
Wind Speed (WSPD): 27.2 kts
Wind Gust (GST): 35.0 kts
Wave Height (WVHT): 12.1 ft
Dominant Wave Period (DPD): 8 sec
Average Period (APD): 6.6 sec
Atmospheric Pressure (PRES): 29.92 in
Pressure Tendency (PTDY): -0.04 in ( Falling )
Air Temperature (ATMP): 76.5 °F
Water Temperature (WTMP): 78.1 °F
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#569 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 am

i guess that was a little messing here is the link
http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=41001
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#570 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:04 am

Lookie here guys!

IN FACT...IT
SEEMS THAT THE CYCLONE IS SOMEWHAT ATTACHED TO A FRONTAL ZONE.

This was in the discussion...Wxman57 said the system yesterday did not have a front. So who's more tropical now. This should be Christ.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#571 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:15 am

ok good night all ... well see what happens in the morning...
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#572 Postby whereverwx » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:39 am

*yawn* Here's the latest from the long range...

Image
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 38089
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

#573 Postby Brent » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:40 am

What a boring storm.
0 likes   
#neversummer

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15446
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#574 Postby NDG » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:41 am

Too bad Beryl is getting affected by the dry air over the Carolinas along w/light SW shear otherwise she would had been blowing up by now, lets see as she is approaching the gulf stream's mid 80s deg temps will make her gain more strength or not.
By the way, I think she has been moving on a NNW course pretty much, more northerly than northwesterly.

http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b245/ ... rylSST.jpg

*edited by staff to make image a link - was too large
Last edited by NDG on Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#575 Postby whereverwx » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:41 am

Brent wrote:What a boring storm.


Yeah, I think she needs counseling. She's looking depressed.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#576 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:45 am

Look at the hurricane in the Eastern Pacific. Thats about ready to bomb!
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#577 Postby Grease Monkey » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:46 am

I'm suprised Beryl wasn't downgraded to a TD yet.
0 likes   

whereverwx
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 10:15 pm

#578 Postby whereverwx » Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:58 am

She looks just like Alberto when he was making landfall.

Image Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Grease Monkey
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 727
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 9:25 pm

#579 Postby Grease Monkey » Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:05 am

Very true. Forget what I said. This thing could be a strong TS already. :cheesy:
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#580 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:09 am

The inner core of the system is more defined then it was earlier. But dry air has gotten into the mid levels in destroyed the convection. I would still expect that the surface winds have not weaken alot.
0 likes   


Return to “2006”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests