98L invest,W.GOM,Comments,Sat Pics,Models Thread #3

This is the general tropical discussion area. Anyone can take their shot at predicting a storms path.

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Forum rules

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.

Help Support Storm2K
Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9490
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

#101 Postby ROCK » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:49 pm

I know this has been brought up but looking at this mess right now I have seen a lot uglier systems be classified as a depression. I mean, if I didn't even know any specifics and turned on the sat view, I would say we have a depression or weak TS right now.
This system reminds me of Ivan II when its center reformed closer to the LA coast. I would even venture to say this has more T-storms with it than Ivan II had.


Just keeping hope alive.... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
teal61
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#102 Postby teal61 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:50 pm

westchesterweather wrote:
teal61 wrote:
westchesterweather wrote:
teal61 wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:http://lighthouse.tamucc.edu/overview/009

North wind?


Interesting.


Not interesting at all.


Check it again, hit enter before completeing the post.


Check the post above yours.


Umm.. if you will look closer, it's not the same station that Strat posted. I doubt the accuracy of the pressure reading though. And the ob is over 2 hours old.

http://lighthouse.tamucc.edu/overview/003
Last edited by teal61 on Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#103 Postby NDG » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:50 pm

I still don't see a closed LLC, still appears to be broad at best.
Image
Last edited by NDG on Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#104 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:51 pm

teal61 wrote:
westchesterweather wrote:
teal61 wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:http://lighthouse.tamucc.edu/overview/009

North wind?


Interesting.


Not interesting at all.


Check it again, hit enter before completeing the post.


I doubt that pressure very seriously...matter of fact...if I was doing analysis and had that station plot...I would thow it out. It does not match ANY data around it...and there is plenty of other data around it that is to the contrary. It probably needs to be calibrated upwards a couple of mb's.

As far as the winds are concerned...looks like a windshift due to an outflow boundry. You had a wind shift of ~70 degrees in an hour.
0 likes   

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#105 Postby george_r_1961 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:52 pm

Just my 2 cents here..there is still a SMALL chance of a TD forming..IF we get an LLC forming offshore. Folks in TX/LA need for focus on high rainfall amounts rather than worry about whether ot not this turns into a tropical cyclone. This could be a dangerous situation regardless of whether it develops.
0 likes   

User avatar
KatDaddy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2815
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2002 6:23 pm
Location: League City, Texas

#106 Postby KatDaddy » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:52 pm

Hey AFM! We will have some tropical rains. All this talk about the LLC which does not exist over the GOM.....when will it ever end? Sorry for the sacrasm but we have no LLC everyone. Wxman57 has been telling us all day but many refuse to listen.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tailgater
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3339
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 9:13 pm
Location: St. Amant La.

#107 Postby tailgater » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:54 pm

teal61 wrote:
Stratosphere747 wrote:http://lighthouse.tamucc.edu/overview/009

North wind?


This one is a little more interesting.

http://lighthouse.tamucc.edu/overview/003

Observation is over 2 hours old though but it had a NW wind and a pressure of 1006mb if accurate.


yes very interesting if correct 29.73 would be the lowest pressure around
0 likes   

HurricaneHunter914
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4439
Age: 31
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 7:36 pm
Location: College Station, TX

#108 Postby HurricaneHunter914 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:54 pm

I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
george_r_1961
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3171
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 9:14 pm
Location: Carbondale, Pennsylvania

#109 Postby george_r_1961 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:56 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.



No need for recon. The pros say no llc and thats good enough for me. All i see is an mlc that MAY spin down to the surface.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#110 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:57 pm

Stratosphere747 wrote:AFM...

While we have learned not to look at radar for a closed low to begin forming.

Does this constant area of Tstorm activity that has basically sat for the last two hours between Corpus and Brownsville give any reason to be suspicious?

Seems as if the energy has slowed down?


It will give you the place to watch the sfc pressures...especially if there is a mid level spin. As Derek pointed out today, there has been some research done (it was submitted to the AMS last year in Feb) on the importance mid level vorticity plays in tropical cyclogenesis.

What has me a little concerned...especially as far as a core rain event for tonight is concerned...is that the area of precip is so well developed during the diurnal min...I can't imagine what it will look like come 4 am when we hit the diurnal max.

Especially given the models insistance that some good mid-level vorticity is supposed to set up over the coastal bend/SETX area around sunrise.

We could have a real problem on our hands come 8 am in the Houston/GLS area if this core rain event sets up.
0 likes   

Stormavoider
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:37 pm
Location: Spring Hill Fl.

#111 Postby Stormavoider » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:57 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.


They would have to buzz the entire western gulf to make all of us happy.
Last edited by Stormavoider on Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
NDG
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15469
Joined: Sun Jul 09, 2006 10:14 pm
Location: Orlando, FL

#112 Postby NDG » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:58 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.


I don't think is necessary at this time since it is so close to land radar, buoys and land observations.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#113 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:59 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.


It does NOT have an LLC at this time (or at any other time today). You can take that check to the bank and cash it...


and it will not bounce. :lol:

A flight would have been a waste of money.
0 likes   

westchesterweather

#114 Postby westchesterweather » Tue Jul 25, 2006 8:59 pm

HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.


Recon costs a pretty penny, and without a LLC, there really is no need. There are obs around the area where they can get readings and assume for areas where there are no obs available.
0 likes   

Matt-hurricanewatcher

#115 Postby Matt-hurricanewatcher » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:02 pm

If this thing was 2 degrees to the east things would be different. Buts its not...So I say we just have to watch for the MLC to spin down. But overall the system looks good and wet for texas.
0 likes   

Air Force Met
Military Met
Military Met
Posts: 4372
Age: 56
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:30 am
Location: Roan Mountain, TN

#116 Postby Air Force Met » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:03 pm

westchesterweather wrote:
HurricaneHunter914 wrote:I can't beleive that the NHC isn't sending recon out to 98L. If they did maybe we would find out more about whether this has an LLC or not.


Recon costs a pretty penny, and without a LLC, there really is no need. There are obs around the area where they can get readings and assume for areas where there are no obs available.


And that is the point. There are plenty of buoys around. Lots of oil rigs. If some of those rigs/buoys (and many of those that the public has no access to...so they don't see all the data) had shown light/vrb winds and pressures around 1008mb...they would have sent a plane.

All the data showed relatively strong SSE-SE winds...which means NO LLC. You cannot have a LLC located within a strong pressure SE gradient on one side and a strong SE pressure gradient on the other side. Can't happen. NHC knows this...hence the reason there was no flight.

The western GOM is saturated with obs. This isn't the southern Gulf.
0 likes   

User avatar
teal61
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 9:20 pm
Location: Spring, TX

#117 Postby teal61 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:04 pm

KatDaddy wrote:Hey AFM! We will have some tropical rains. All this talk about the LLC which does not exist over the GOM.....when will it ever end? Sorry for the sacrasm but we have no LLC everyone. Wxman57 has been telling us all day but many refuse to listen.


With all due respect Kat, this is why most of us are here. I don't see a low level center yet, but I do see a mlc and most of the pro's would acknowlege that. How many of these systems have you seen just hang around and finally develop ? In the end it probably will not matter whether it spins down to the surface or not , the result is gonna be the same..lots of rain for somebody.

As far as 57 goes, he's been very negative about this system for the last couple of days. But it's still around...
0 likes   

westchesterweather

#118 Postby westchesterweather » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:06 pm

teal61 wrote:
KatDaddy wrote:Hey AFM! We will have some tropical rains. All this talk about the LLC which does not exist over the GOM.....when will it ever end? Sorry for the sacrasm but we have no LLC everyone. Wxman57 has been telling us all day but many refuse to listen.


With all due respect Kat, this is why most of us are here. I don't see a low level center yet, but I do see a mlc and most of the pro's would acknowlege that. How many of these systems have you seen just hang around and finally develop ? In the end it probably will not matter whether it spins down to the surface or not , the result is gonna be the same..lots of rain for somebody.

As far as 57 goes, he's been very negative about this system for the last couple of days. But it's still around...


Maybe he is being negative about it because there is no LLC??? And, can you show me where being negative about this system has gotten him into trouble wrt forecasting?
0 likes   

User avatar
Noles2006
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 424
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 9:57 am
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Contact:

#119 Postby Noles2006 » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:07 pm

teal61 wrote:
KatDaddy wrote:Hey AFM! We will have some tropical rains. All this talk about the LLC which does not exist over the GOM.....when will it ever end? Sorry for the sacrasm but we have no LLC everyone. Wxman57 has been telling us all day but many refuse to listen.


With all due respect Kat, this is why most of us are here. I don't see a low level center yet, but I do see a mlc and most of the pro's would acknowlege that. How many of these systems have you seen just hang around and finally develop ? In the end it probably will not matter whether it spins down to the surface or not , the result is gonna be the same..lots of rain for somebody.

As far as 57 goes, he's been very negative about this system for the last couple of days. But it's still around...


Yes, he's said that he doesn't think development will occur with this system for the last couple of days... and.. you know what... HE'S BEEN RIGHT. Back off of 57, please.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yankeegirl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3417
Age: 49
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 11:59 pm
Location: Cy-Fair, Northwest Houston
Contact:

#120 Postby Yankeegirl » Tue Jul 25, 2006 9:08 pm

I am just glad to be seeing some rain here!!! Weather or not there is a LLC or any type of circulation, the Gulf coast is definately going to get a good soakin'... I think we can all agree on that....
0 likes   


Return to “Talkin' Tropics”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cycloneye, eyesontropics and 44 guests